抗鸡球虫病的蛋白酶抑制剂药物的筛选及安全性评价
[Abstract]:The coccidiosis of the chicken is mainly in the intestinal tract of the chicken, which causes the chicken coccidiosis which is the main characteristic of the intestinal pathological changes, and seriously harms the development of the chicken industry. At present, due to the prevention of the chicken coccidiosis, most of the vaccines are live seedlings, and the inoculation live seedlings may have the phenomenon of back-and-back. Therefore, the drug control and control of the chicken coccidiosis is still the most important way, such as, for example, the salinomycin, the maduramicin, the monensin, the hainan, and the like. However, with the emergence of the drug-resistance of the Eimeria strain, the clinical prevention and control are in great difficulty. Therefore, it is necessary to find new drugs to control the coccidiosis of the chicken. Recently, it has been found that the protease inhibitor drug can inhibit the invasion of the protozoa. Gefitinib, erlotinib, and criptinidine are tyrosine kinase inhibitor drugs, which can inhibit the invasion of host cells of Toxoplasma gondii. However, whether a protease inhibitor such as DCI or gefitinib has the effect of anti-coccidiosis has not been reported. Therefore, this test is to prevent and treat the chicken coccidiosis by DCI, gefitinib, erlotinib and Crinopini, and to screen out the drugs which can effectively prevent and control the coccidiosis of the chicken, and to evaluate the safety of the screened drugs through the clinical observation and the blood biochemical indexes. in order to provide a new candidate for the prevention and treatment of chicken coccidiosis, a screening test for preventing the preparation of the protease inhibitor of the chicken coccidiosis selected from the group consisting of 380 healthy chickens with similar body weight,19 groups according to the different administration doses,20/ group, (positive control group, drug control group, blank control group, The DCI-time-specific dose of 3 groups, the gefitinib-fold specific dose of 4 groups, the Kristinian-fold specific dose of 4 groups, and the erlotinib-fold specific dose of 5 groups). Except for the blank control group, after 7 days of administration of the rest of the group, 1.0 to 104 E. tenella sporulated oocysts were administered orally. The spirit and the appetite of the chicken were observed during the infection. After a week of coccidiosis, each group was weighed individually, the survival rate, the weight gain rate, the blood stool score, the relative weight gain rate and the cecum lesion score were calculated, and each group of feces was collected and the number of oocysts was calculated. The results showed that the anti-coccidiosis index was 117.34-161.04, the anti-coccidiosis index of gefitinib was 87.83-110.55, and the anti-coccidiosis index was 98.94-132.79, and the anti-coccidiosis index of erlotinib was 68.54-97.49. The results showed that the anti-coccidiosis effect of the dose group in the DCI is good, the anti-coccidiosis index is 161.04, that is, 0.005 mg/ min, the drinking water is administered for 7 days.2, the screening test for the treatment of the chicken coccidiosis protease inhibitor drug selects 380 healthy chickens with similar body weight, and is divided into 19 groups and 20/ groups according to different doses. (Positive control group, drug control group, blank control group, DCI-time ratio dose of 3 groups, gefitinib-time-ratio 4 groups, Kristitinix dose of 4 groups, erlotinib-times-specific dose of 5 groups). In addition to the blank control group, the other groups were inoculated with coccidiosis in the chicks, and 1.0 to 104 E. tenella sporozoites were inoculated orally, and 5 days after the inoculation of the coccidia. After a week of coccidiosis, each group was weighed individually, the survival rate, the weight gain rate, the blood score, the relative weight gain rate, the cecum lesion score, and the like were calculated, and each group of feces was collected and the number of oocysts was calculated. The results showed that the anti-coccidiosis index was 133.13-178.73 in the DCI group, the anti-coccidiosis index was 110.66-135.96 in the gefitinib group, 85.51-125.17, and the anti-coccidiosis index was 89.76-109.47 in the erlotinib group. The results indicated that the efficacy of the dose group in the DCI group was good, the comprehensive evaluation of the anti-coccidiosis index was 178.73, that is, 0.005 mg/ kg, the drinking water was administered for 5 days. The safety evaluation of the DCI on the target animal was estimated to be 250-day-old chicks, divided into 5 groups, each group of 50 chickens. The dose groups were grouped into the blank control group, the 1-fold dose group (0.005 mg/ day), the 3-fold dose group (0.015 mg/ day), the 5-fold dose group (0.025 mg/ day) and the 10-fold dose group (0.05 mg/ day) according to the different dose groups. The blank control group was treated with tap water and the rest of the other groups were treated with continuous drinking water for 21 days. The safety evaluation of the drug was carried out by clinical observation and the hematology, blood chemistry, histopathology and the body cross-section of the experimental animals. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the hematology parameters in the DCI group compared with the control group (P0.05). The blood biochemical and ocular tissue of the 1-fold dose group did not change the pathological changes, and the blood biochemical test of the alkaline phosphatase was detected in the 3-fold and higher dose group. Compared with the control group, the difference was significant (P0.05). The liver and intestinal tissue sections were observed in individual chickens, and the liver and intestinal tissue sections were observed under the microscope. The liver of the 3-fold dose group had mild edema and fat degeneration. There were no pathological changes in the intestinal tract; the fatty degeneration of the 5-fold group was severe, and the intestinal villi were broken; the reticulopathy caused by the inflammatory cells in the 10-fold group resulted in the degeneration of the fat and the break of the intestinal villi. The safety test shows that the three times and above dose groups are harmful to the chicks, and the liver and the intestinal tract of the chicken are mainly damaged. The results showed that the DCI 0.005 mg/ only was safe for clinical medication.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:S858.31
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 梁斌;鸡球虫病感染的防治[J];甘肃畜牧兽医;2000年05期
2 莫千亮;诊治鸡球虫病一例[J];广西畜牧兽医;2000年04期
3 赵海全,郭国富,王富晓,陈家正;中草药防治鸡球虫病的研究概况[J];河南畜牧兽医;2000年12期
4 孙志强;鸡球虫病的防治[J];云南畜牧兽医;2000年02期
5 程春林;肉仔鸡球虫病的诊治[J];养禽与禽病防治;2000年03期
6 马永来;;鸡球虫病的防治[J];农家之友;2000年03期
7 施为国,汤小女;种鸡球虫病死亡的性别差异[J];中国兽医杂志;2001年04期
8 卢永祥,周利娟,朱春根;鸡球虫病诊断和防治[J];浙江畜牧兽医;2001年03期
9 王立波;鸡球虫病的致病因素[J];山东家禽;2001年02期
10 王文顺;鸡球虫病的诊疗报告[J];福建畜牧兽医;2001年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 夏艳勋;赵传壁;藏莹安;;浅析鸡球虫病的发病原因及防治失败原因[A];中国畜牧兽医学会禽病学分会第十一次学术研讨会论文集[C];2002年
2 龙云;;中草药在抗鸡球虫病上的研究进展[A];纪念中国畜牧兽医学会中兽医学分会成立30周年中国畜牧兽医学会中兽医学分会2009年学术年会、华东区第十九次中兽医科研协作与学术研讨会论文集[C];2009年
3 黄丽美;;山地放养鸡球虫病的诊治报告[A];福建省畜牧兽医学会2009年学术年会论文集[C];2009年
4 马进凤;邢建权;;鸡球虫病的诊治与预防[A];2010畜牧业与低碳经济科技论文集[C];2010年
5 雷思琦;韩旭东;李定刚;牛婵娟;;中药防治鸡球虫病的应用研究[A];第二届中国黄羽肉鸡行业发展大会会刊[C];2010年
6 何国秀;赵玉侠;王敏滑;;浅谈当前鸡球虫病的流行特点存在的问题与防治对策[A];河南省畜牧兽医学会第七届理事会第二次会议暨2008年学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年
7 杨丽丽;李英霞;高睿;;鸡球虫病的防治体会[A];中国畜牧兽医学会动物传染病学分会第十二次学术研讨会论文集[C];2007年
8 黄翠姣;;青蒿及复方中草药防治鸡球虫病的试验研究[A];中国畜牧兽医学会2009学术年会论文集(下册)[C];2009年
9 张志聪;;一例鸡球虫病的诊疗体会[A];福建省科协第八届学术年会分会场“转变饲养方式,促进海西畜牧业和谐发展”学术年会论文集[C];2008年
10 晋爱兰;陈秀真;张供领;万双秀;;中药和西药防治鸡球虫病的对比试验[A];山东畜牧兽医学会禽病学专业委员会第一次学术研讨会论文集[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 牛金辉;鸡球虫病重在预防[N];新疆科技报(汉);2007年
2 方永芬;三大因素引发鸡球虫病[N];云南科技报;2012年
3 黄丰康;马杜拉霉素治鸡球虫病严控用量[N];江苏农业科技报;2007年
4 郑卫生;春夏季节是鸡球虫病的高发期[N];中国畜牧兽医报;2009年
5 发达;谨防鸡球虫病[N];陕西科技报;2009年
6 鸡泽县农牧局 郝静云;谨防蛋鸡球虫病引发混感[N];河北科技报;2012年
7 上海恒丰强动物药业有限公司技术部 朱红军 王华听;浅述鸡球虫病的病原及其防治[N];中国畜牧兽医报;2013年
8 马艳;科学合理用药 严控鸡球虫病[N];河南科技报;2014年
9 河北新世纪药业技术部 论玉英;高热高湿时 提防鸡球虫病[N];河北科技报;2007年
10 临城县畜牧办公室 侯增海;一例柴鸡球虫病的诊治[N];河北科技报;2007年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 杜爱芳;鸡球虫病的中药防治与DNA疫苗研究[D];浙江大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 郭钰珏;鸡球虫病三价四株活疫苗实验室效力和安全性研究[D];山西农业大学;2015年
2 张晶艳;鸡球虫三价弱毒疫苗安全性及免疫效果试验[D];西北农林科技大学;2015年
3 罗家莹;氟腺呤溶液剂在肉鸡体内的药动学及药效学初步研究[D];南京农业大学;2014年
4 张如;抗鸡球虫病的蛋白酶抑制剂药物的筛选及安全性评价[D];吉林大学;2016年
5 林江蔚;“球灭”颗粒制备及其防治鸡球虫病试验[D];西南大学;2010年
6 郑寅;中药肠血平颗粒对鸡球虫病的防治试验[D];西北农林科技大学;2013年
7 黄伯贤;防治鸡球虫病药物筛选及组方[D];东北农业大学;2010年
8 李旭红;岳阳地区鸡球虫病调查与防治研究[D];湖南农业大学;2007年
9 苏子超;临沂地区鸡球虫病流行病学调查及抗药性研究[D];山东农业大学;2012年
10 肖寒;鸡球虫的分离鉴定及防治鸡球虫病中西药复方制剂的研究[D];安徽农业大学;2008年
,本文编号:2437667
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/dongwuyixue/2437667.html