当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 高中教育论文 >

不同性格特征中学生体育课前后心境变化的研究

发布时间:2018-03-14 13:12

  本文选题:中学生 切入点:心境 出处:《苏州大学》2016年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:研究目的:研究通过对不同性格特征中学生体育课前、后心境变化的分析研究,了解体育课对中学生心理活动的不同影响,以期为制定科学合理的体育教程、因材施教提供依据,从而使中学生能以更加良好的心境状态面对学校生活。研究方法:选定苏州某高中高二年级483名在校学生作为实验对象,其中男生274、女生209,平均年龄16~20岁。实验分为三个阶段进行,于实验前、中、后对实验对象分别进行量表调查和评定。第一阶段为实验前(即体育课前),向实验对象发放艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)以及心境状态量表(POMS),第二阶段为实验中(即一周体育课后)再次对实验对象发放心境状态量表(POMS),第三阶段为实验后(即两周体育课后)对实验对象又一次发放心境状态量表(POMS)。实验实施者在学生完成问卷填写后,立即收取问卷并完成数据的统计工作。所测数据采用SPASS For Windows 17.0软件进行数据分析。研究结果:1.实验前:(1)实验对象中男、女生在P、E、N、L维度得分差异有统计学差异,男生的P、E分高于女生(p0.05),但男生N、L分低于女生(P0.05),男女生在E、N维度的得分比较中上非常显著(P0.01);男生的精神质(P)、内外向(E)、情绪稳定性(N)高分比例均高于女生,但效度量表(L)高分比例小于女生。(2)男生的心境状态总得分低于女生(即男生的TMD值低于女生),男生TMD值为108.37±20.05、女生TMD值为110.43±22.63。说明在体育课前男生的心境状态好于女生;在愤怒、抑郁和精力三个维度得分中,男生的得分都要高于女生;在紧张、疲劳、慌乱和自尊四个维度得分中,则女生的得分要高于男生(P0.05或P小于0.01)。2.实验中:男生的心境状态总得分低于女生(即男生的TMD值低于女生),男生TMD值为111.24±22.05、女生TMD值为113.33±22.63。(P0.05或P小于0.01);与体育课前男女生心境状态总得分比较,有所下降。3.实验后:男生的心境状态总得分低于女生(即男生的TMD值低于女生),男生TMD值为7.17±3.76、女生TMD值为7.54±2.99(P0.05或P小于0.01);与体育课前男女生心境状态总得分比较,有大幅度下降。研究结论:1.不同性格特征中学生体育课前、后的心境状态存在差异:乐观开朗类型的中学生较多表现出积极的心境状态,焦虑易怒类型的中学生较多的表现出消极的心境状态;2.体育课对促进不同性格特征中学生积极心境状态的唤醒以及维持时期的保持均有积极作用,有利于改善中学生的消极心境,提高中学生学习效率;3.体育课对不同性别中学生心境状态的影响存在差异:男性中学生比女性中学生较多表现出积极的心境状态,较少表现出消极的心境状态。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the different effects of physical education on the psychological activities of middle school students before and after physical education with different personality characteristics, in order to make a scientific and reasonable course of physical education, the purpose of this study is to analyze the changes of state of mind before and after the physical education of middle school students with different personality characteristics. Teaching students in accordance with their aptitude can help them to face school life in a better state of mind. Methods: 483 senior middle school students in a senior high school in Suzhou were selected as the subjects of the experiment. Among them, 274 boys and 209 girls, with an average age of 16 to 20 years, were divided into three stages: before the experiment, in the middle of the experiment, The first stage was before the experiment (i.e., before physical education, the Eysenck personality questionnaire was issued to the subjects) and the state of mind scale (POMS), the second stage was in the experiment (I. e., one week body). In the third stage, after the experiment (that is, after two weeks of physical education), the subjects were again given the state of mind scale (POMS). After the students completed the questionnaire, the experimental implementers completed the questionnaire. The data were analyzed with the software SPASS For Windows 17.0. The results showed that there were significant differences in scores of male and female subjects in the dimension between male and female subjects before the experiment. The P0. 05 scores of male students were higher than that of girls, but the scores of Nel scores of boys were lower than those of girls. The scores of male and female students were significantly higher than those of female students in the scores of en dimension (P 0. 01), and the high scores of mental quality, introversion and extroversion, emotional stability of boys were higher than those of girls, while the scores of male and female students were significantly higher than those of female students, and the scores of male and female students were significantly higher than those of female students. The total score of male students was lower than that of girls (that is, the TMD value of boys was lower than that of girls, the TMD value of boys was 108.37 卤20.05, and the TMD value of girls was 110.43 卤22.63). This indicated that the mood state of boys was better than that of girls before physical education. Of the three dimensions of depression and energy, boys scored higher than girls; in the four dimensions of stress, fatigue, panic and self-esteem, The score of female students was higher than that of boys (P0.05 or P < 0.01). In the experiment, the total score of mental state of male students was lower than that of girls (that is, the TMD value of boys was lower than that of girls, the TMD value of boys was 111.24 卤22.05, the TMD value of girls was 113.33 卤22.63.00.05 or P < 0.01), and that of boys before physical education was lower than that of girls. The total score of female students' state of mind was compared, After the experiment, the total score of mental state of male students was lower than that of female students (that is, the TMD value of male students was lower than that of female students, the TMD value of boys was 7.17 卤3.76, the TMD value of girls was 7.54 卤2.99p 0.05 or P < 0.01), and the total score of mood state of male and female students before physical education was lower than that of male students before PE class. The results showed that there were significant differences in the mood state of middle school students with different personality traits before and after physical education. The students with optimistic and cheerful types showed positive state of mind. Students with anxiety and irritability tend to show negative state of mind 2.PE has a positive effect on arousal of positive state of mind of students with different personality characteristics and maintenance period. The effects of physical education on the mood state of middle school students of different genders were different: male middle school students showed more positive state of mind than female middle school students. Less negative state of mind.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:G633.96

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈坚;张家宝;蔡翔飞;;大学生体育课后即时情绪的初步研究[J];湖北财经高等专科学校学报;2006年05期

2 尹继红;;我校学生体育课选课规律调研究[J];北京体育大学学报;2007年S1期

3 范建国;;农村中学学生体育课逃课原因及对策[J];科学咨询(教育科研);2007年10期

4 刘华云;;提高学生体育课兴趣的探讨[J];成都中医药大学学报(教育科学版);2008年02期

5 柏杨;顾新红;;大学生体育课倦怠量表的编制[J];西安体育学院学报;2008年01期

6 李楠;程其练;李伟;苏链;;对南昌市中学学生体育课兴趣的调查与研究[J];黑龙江科技信息;2009年03期

7 张龙;;影响学生体育课兴趣的原因探析[J];中国校外教育;2009年09期

8 商伟;薛峰;;大学生体育课兴趣对体育课投入的影响[J];湖北体育科技;2013年03期

9 林春;浅谈少数民族学生体育课的组织教学[J];宁德师专学报(自然科学版);1996年01期

10 张虎;;如何培养和激发学生体育课的学习兴趣[J];新课程(教研);2010年05期

相关会议论文 前5条

1 马德森;孙庆祝;;班级环境对肥胖大学生体育课歧视知觉的影响:成就动机的调节作用[A];第四届中国体育博士高层论坛论文摘要集[C];2012年

2 艾志毅;;论体弱学生体育课的激活点[A];新世纪优秀学术成果评选暨交流大会论文集[C];2000年

3 徐义娟;史曙生;赵西英;;中学生体育课能量消耗研究[A];第九届全国体育科学大会论文摘要汇编(3)[C];2011年

4 王国勇;陆小聪;PEREIRA BEATRIZ;JORGE MOTA;;国外学生体育课运动心率的调查研究[A];体质研究与健康促进论文集[C];2006年

5 邢继庆;黄爱庆;房巍;阮利民;;运用模糊数学理论对大学生体育课评价的研究[A];2014年全国教育工作会议论文集[C];2014年

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 三河市第七小学 郑伦;如何增强小学生体育课的兴趣[N];廊坊日报;2011年

2 记者 司文;蛋奶工程220万人受益[N];西安日报;2011年

3 山东省郓城县东关小学 王清梅;要高度重视“过程性考核”[N];中国体育报;2012年

4 记者 修菁;“雾霾天学生体育课怎么上?”[N];人民政协报;2014年

5 蒋鑫;浅谈体育教师角色如何转变[N];甘肃日报;2008年

6 同煤教育中心机厂小学 魏尽英;浅谈小学体育课兴趣的培养[N];大同日报;2007年

7 本报记者 卢苇;提升高校体育“高度”[N];中国体育报;2013年

8 山东省高密市教科院 宋学光;课程改革亟待落实体育法规[N];中国体育报;2007年

9 经纬;让青少年更加茁壮成长[N];健康报;2007年

10 记者 李松 黄洁通讯员 李力;学生体育课猝死学校被索赔16万[N];法制日报;2006年

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 滕静;中学生体育课伤害事故的法律责任分析[D];湖南师范大学;2015年

2 陈伟光;不同性格特征中学生体育课前后心境变化的研究[D];苏州大学;2016年

3 卜婧;北京第二实验小学学生体育课上调皮行为特点分析[D];首都体育学院;2014年

4 卢文彪;大学生体育课中补液对红细胞免疫及血液流变学影响的实验研究[D];华南师范大学;2003年

5 陈立;论中小学生体育课人身伤害事件中的学校责任[D];华东政法大学;2014年



本文编号:1611359

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/1611359.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户da8a0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com