《普通高中数学课程标准(实验)》与新版《高中数学课程标准》内容比较研究
发布时间:2018-05-04 18:27
本文选题:课程标准 + 内容比较 ; 参考:《中央民族大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着社会的不断发展,原有的数学课程内容已经不能适应素质教育的培养目标。目前,我国正在进行第八次课程改革。《普通高中数学课程标准(实验)》自2003年颁布并开始实施,已经过十多年的实践检验。这次《普通高中数学课程标准(修订)》的颁布意味着这次课程改革进入全面深化阶段。每一次课程改革的成果均通过修订后的课程标准来体现,课程标准是指导教材编写、教学、考试评价的重要依据,是行业的标准。对课程标准的研究,离不开对课程标准文本及其课程内容的研究,课程内容是课程众多要素中非常重要的构成部分,课程其他要素目标的顺利实施均要通过课程内容这个载体来体现和实现,同时通过课程标准内容的研究有助于加深我们对课程标准更深的认识。新颁布的《普通高中数学课程标准(修订)》(以下简称《修订》)与2003年颁布的《普通高中数学课程标准(实验)》(以下简称《实验》)相比,在内容及形式上有了新的变化、新的发展,我们有必要去摸清两版课程标准内容异同点,以期更好地把握新课程标准。因此,本篇论文就两版高中数学课程标准的内容异同进行比较研究,以期更好的把握新颁布的课程标准内容,同时比较出《修订》与《实验》相比,继承、发展、创新了哪些内容?在内容比较的过程中,本文主要采用定性与定量相结合的方法进行两版课程标准文本比较。通过比较发现,《修订》与《实验》相比,主要有以下变化:(1)课程目标有了新的认识和发展;(2)课程设计思路更加全面,并且体现出与时俱进的特点;(3)课程内容标准方面,在课程广度、课程深度、课时数上均有变化;(4)在课程内容结构,更加突出基础性、选择性,更加突出内容主线。本文共分为以下几部分:第一部分,介绍论文的研究背景,并说明其研究意义和目的;第二部分是文献综述,主要介绍国内外与该论文有关的研究成果;第三部分介绍了本论文研究的主要研究过程与方法;第四部分是研究的主要内容,是对两本课程标准内容进行比较研究;最后一部分是对本研究得出的结论及一些思考。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of society, the original mathematics curriculum content can no longer adapt to the cultivation goal of quality education. At present, the eighth curriculum reform is being carried out in our country. The Mathematics Curriculum Standard of General Senior High School (experiment) has been put into practice for more than ten years since it was promulgated and put into practice in 2003. The promulgation of General Senior High School Mathematics Curriculum Standard (revision) means that the curriculum reform has entered a comprehensive deepening stage. The results of each curriculum reform are reflected by the revised curriculum standard, which is the important basis for guiding the compilation of teaching materials, teaching, examination and evaluation, and is the standard of the industry. The study of curriculum standard is inseparable from the study of the text of curriculum standard and its curriculum content, which is a very important component of many elements of curriculum. The smooth implementation of other essential elements of curriculum should be reflected and realized through the carrier of curriculum content. Meanwhile, the research of curriculum standard content will help us to deepen our understanding of curriculum standard. The newly promulgated Mathematics Curriculum Standard of General Senior High School (revision) (hereinafter referred to as "revision") has new changes in content and form compared with the "ordinary Senior Middle School Mathematics Curriculum Standard (experiment)" (hereinafter referred to as "experiment") issued in 2003. With the new development, it is necessary for us to find out the similarities and differences between the two versions of curriculum standards in order to better grasp the new curriculum standards. Therefore, this paper makes a comparative study on the content similarities and differences of the two versions of senior high school mathematics curriculum standard, in order to better grasp the newly promulgated curriculum standard content, and at the same time, compare the "revised" with "experiment", inherit and develop. What are the innovations? In the process of content comparison, this paper mainly adopts qualitative and quantitative methods to compare the two versions of curriculum standard texts. Through comparison, it is found that compared with "experiment", there are mainly the following changes: 1) the curriculum objectives have a new understanding and development, and the course design ideas are more comprehensive, and they reflect the characteristics of keeping pace with the times. The content structure of the curriculum is more basic, selective and main line. This paper is divided into the following parts: the first part introduces the research background of the paper, and explains its significance and purpose, the second part is the literature review, mainly introduces the domestic and foreign research results related to the paper; The third part introduces the main research process and methods of this paper; the fourth part is the main content of the study, is to compare the content of the two curriculum standards; the last part is the conclusion of this study and some thoughts.
【学位授予单位】:中央民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G633.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 金华;孙晓天;;中日高中数学函数内容标准比较研究[J];中央民族大学学报(自然科学版);2017年01期
2 曹一鸣;王万松;;高中概率统计内容设置的国际比较——基于15个国家数学课程标准的研究[J];数学教育学报;2016年01期
3 田慧生;;落实立德树人根本任务 全面深化课程教学改革[J];课程.教材.教法;2015年01期
4 施娜;孙晓天;;基于“义务教育数学课程标准”实验稿与修订稿的计量分析研究[J];中央民族大学学报(自然科学版);2012年04期
5 刘宝仙;;高中信息技术《算法与程序设计》模块课堂教学有效性探究——与数学“算法初步”整合教学行动研究[J];海峡科学;2012年02期
6 俞求是;;高中数学课程标准实验问题研究[J];教育学报;2009年06期
7 孙名符;李涵;;中日两国高中数学新课程目标的比较研究[J];数学教育学报;2008年05期
8 郭民;;中美两国高中数学课程中统计和概率内容标准比较[J];外国教育研究;2007年09期
9 韩龙淑;;高中“课标”与“大纲”中立体几何内容比较研究及启示[J];数学教育学报;2006年02期
10 孔凡哲;史宁中;;四边形课程难度的定量分析比较[J];数学教育学报;2006年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 王培;对《普通高中数学课程标准(实验)》的研究[D];苏州大学;2009年
,本文编号:1844106
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/1844106.html