当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 高中教育论文 >

五个版本高中生物学教材习题与课程标准知识目标的一致性分析

发布时间:2018-06-01 06:53

  本文选题:生物学教材习题 + 课程标准 ; 参考:《江西师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:20世纪90年代,以课程改革为核心的教育改革在全球范围迅速展开。21世纪,这股“基于标准”的教育改革浪潮席卷我国,第八次教育改革拉开序幕,最具标志性的措施是在各学科领域制定并颁布了相应课程标准。课程标准是教材编写、教学评价及考试命题的依据,教材是课程改革理念转化为现实的媒介,习题是教材的重要组成部分。一致性指教育系统中各因素与课程标准的吻合程度,是判断课程执行力的关键指标。分析教材习题与课程标准的一致性,能反映课程标准在教材中的落实情况,提供修订与完善教材的现实依据,给予开展一致性分析的案例借鉴。在我国,“一致性”研究不够成熟,尤其是在生物学课程领域,迄今尚未对高中生物学教材习题与课程标准的一致性进行分析。本文在总结国内外基于标准的一致性评价研究现状的基础上,阐明相关概念,并分析学业评价与课程标准一致性的研究工具,确定运用韦伯分析模式,从知识种类、知识广度、知识深度、知识分布平衡性这四个维度,分别分析人教版、浙科版、苏教版、北师大版和中图版这五个版本的高中生物学必修教材习题与课程标准知识目标的一致性,并比较五个版本教材习题的一致性水平。结论如下:各版本的教材习题与课程标准知识目标的总体一致性水平不同,从高到低排序为:北师大版(29)浙科版(28)苏教版(29)人教版(29)中图版。每个版本的高中生物学必修教材习题与课程标准的知识目标在知识种类、知识广度和知识分布平衡性这三个维度基本一致,而在知识深度维度的一致性较低。具体表现为:1.各版本的教材习题与课程标准在知识种类维度的一致性较高,人教版=苏教版(29)浙科版=中图版(29)北师大版。其中人教版和苏教版在所有主题上达到一致,浙科版和中图版只在“生态环境的保护”这个主题未达到一致,而北师大版在“人类遗传病”和“生态系统”两个主题不一致。2.多数版本的教材习题与课程标准在知识广度维度的一致性很高,人教版=浙科版(28)苏教版=中图版(29)北师大版。其中人教版、浙科版、苏教版和中图版在所有主题上达到一致,北师大版在“生态系统”这个主题不一致。3.各版本的教材习题与课程标准在知识深度维度的一致性较低,浙科版=北师大版(29)苏教版=中图版(29)人教版。其中对于“人类遗传病”、“种群和群落”和“生态系统”这三个主题,五个版本均未达到一致。4.各版本的教材习题与课程标准在知识分布平衡性维度的一致性较高,北师大版(29)人教版=苏教版(29)中图版(29)浙科版。其中北师大版在所有主题上达到一致。根据研究结果,分别对各个版本的高中生物学必修教材从一致性的四个维度提出习题修订建议。最后,指出了本研究的不足之处及对未来研究的展望。
[Abstract]:In the 1990s, the curriculum reform as the core of the education reform in the global scope of the rapid development of the 21st century, this "standards-based" wave of education reform swept our country, the eighth education reform began. The most significant measure is the development and promulgation of curriculum standards in various disciplines. Course standard is the basis of compiling teaching material, teaching evaluation and examination proposition. Teaching material is the medium of transforming curriculum reform idea into reality, exercise is an important part of teaching material. Consistency refers to the degree of consistency between various factors and curriculum standards in the educational system, and is the key index to judge curriculum execution. Analyzing the consistency of textbook exercises and curriculum standards can reflect the implementation of curriculum standards in teaching materials, provide the realistic basis for revising and perfecting textbooks, and give a case study of consistency analysis. In our country, the research of "consistency" is not mature enough, especially in the field of biology curriculum. So far, there has not been an analysis of the consistency of exercises and curriculum standards in senior high school biology textbooks. On the basis of summarizing the current research situation of standards-based conformance evaluation at home and abroad, this paper clarifies the relevant concepts, analyzes the research tools of academic evaluation and curriculum standard consistency, determines the use of Webb analysis model, from the knowledge types, knowledge breadth, In the four dimensions of knowledge depth and knowledge distribution balance, this paper analyzes the consistency between the exercises of the required senior high school biology textbooks and the knowledge goals of the curriculum standards in the five versions of the human education edition, the Zhejiang science edition, the Su education edition, the Beijing normal University edition and the middle map version, respectively. At the same time, the consistency level of the exercises in the five versions of the textbook is compared. The conclusions are as follows: the overall consistency level between the exercises of each edition and the knowledge goal of the curriculum standard is different. The order from high to low is: Peking normal University edition (29) Zhejiang science edition (28) Su education edition (29) people education edition (No. 29) Chinese version. Each version of the required senior high school biology textbook exercises and curriculum standards of knowledge goals in the knowledge category, knowledge breadth and knowledge distribution balance of the three dimensions are basically the same, but in the depth of knowledge dimension of the consistency is low. The concrete expression is 1: 1. The consistency between the exercises and the curriculum standard of each version of the textbook is higher in the dimension of knowledge type, the version of personal education = the edition of Su Jiao (29) the version of Zhejiang branch = the edition of Zhongtu (29) the edition of Beijing normal University. Among them, the people's Education Edition and the Su religious Edition are consistent on all the themes, the Zhejiang and Zhongtu versions are not the same only in the theme of "Protection of the Ecological Environment", while the Beijing normal University version is inconsistent with the two themes of "Human genetic Disease" and "ecosystem". There is a high consistency between the exercises of most versions of textbooks and the curriculum standard in the dimension of knowledge breadth, which is the version of personal Education = the version of Zhejiang Science (28) the version of Su Education = the edition of Zhongtu (29) the version of Beijing normal University. Among them, the people's Education Edition, Zhejiang Science Edition, Su Jiao edition and the Chinese version are consistent on all the themes, and the Beijing normal University version is inconsistent in the theme of "ecosystem." 3. The consistency between the exercises and the curriculum standard of each edition is low in the depth of knowledge, the Zhejiang version = Beijing normal University version 29) the Su version = the Chinese version 29) the human education edition. For the three themes of "human genetic disease", "population and community" and "ecosystem", the five versions did not reach the same. 4. The consistency between the exercises and the curriculum standard of each version of the textbook is higher in the dimension of knowledge distribution balance, the version of Beijing normal University (version 29) the version of personal Education = the edition of Su Jiao (29) the version of map and version 29) the version of Zhejiang branch. The Beijing normal University version is consistent on all themes. According to the results of the study, each version of the required senior high school biology textbooks from the four dimensions of consistency of exercise revision suggestions. Finally, the deficiency of this study and the prospect of future research are pointed out.
【学位授予单位】:江西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G633.91

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 蔡玉娇;贡和法;;基于学科核心素养培育的教学与课标一致性——以高中思想政治课教学为例[J];新课程研究(上旬刊);2016年11期

2 田一;张咏梅;彭香;;学业质量监测与课程标准一致性研究[J];上海教育科研;2016年09期

3 张丽鑫;;试论小学数学学业评价与课程标准一致性的研究[J];课程教育研究;2015年32期

4 钟莉莉;;初中化学考试与课程标准一致性探究[J];读书文摘;2015年12期

5 田苗;;小学数学学业评价与课程标准一致性分析[J];数学学习与研究;2015年10期

6 徐泓;;教学、评价与课程标准的一致性研究——以高中化学必修1“胶体”内容为例[J];化学教学;2015年02期

7 鞠慧;;高中学业评价与课程标准一致性研究的新视角[J];新课程(下);2014年12期

8 伍亚婷;解凯彬;;2007~2013年江苏省生物学业水平测试试卷与课程标准(必修)的一致性关系研究[J];中学生物学;2014年04期

9 崔允o7;;学业评价与课程标准的一致性建构[J];上海教育;2013年28期

10 潘东峰;;小学数学学业评价与课程标准一致性的研究[J];基础教育论坛;2013年16期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 刘学智;小学数学学业评价与课程标准一致性的研究[D];东北师范大学;2008年

相关硕士学位论文 前7条

1 刘琦琦;初中生物学业水平测试与课程标准的一致性研究[D];曲阜师范大学;2016年

2 吴玲秀;2009-2014年天津市高考生物试题与课程标准一致性的分析[D];华中师范大学;2015年

3 杨曦;高中数学教材习题与课程标准的一致性研究[D];南京师范大学;2015年

4 邱玉玲;广东地理高考试卷与课程标准的一致性研究[D];江西师范大学;2014年

5 杨胜英;2009-2013年广东省高中生物学业水平考试与内容标准的一致性研究[D];华中师范大学;2014年

6 郭敏;教科书习题与课程标准一致性的比较研究[D];曲阜师范大学;2014年

7 张志红;初中化学学业水平考试与课程标准的一致性研究[D];曲阜师范大学;2011年



本文编号:1963266

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/1963266.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户33db7***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com