中美高中化学教材课后习题的比较研究

发布时间：2018-06-05 13:50

本文选题：高中化学 + 中美教材　；参考：《西北大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：近几年来,随着我国基础教育改革的不断推进和实行,中学化学教学也在改革的过程中发生了翻天覆地的变化,并在这个过程中涌现出了很多的先进理念。作为教材重要组成部分的课后习题也发生了很大的变化,习题的类型增多了,习题的功能转变了,习题的教学方式也发生了一定的变化。但是通过查阅资料发现,教材课后习题的编制与设置还具有一定的缺陷,与新课改的要求还有一定的差距。美国化学课程在历史上经历过几次大的改革,现在的发展已经接近成熟,美国化学课程改革的结果使美国化学教材课后习题的功能更完善,课后习题的编制也更加合理,这对我国的化学教材课后习题的编制有一定的借鉴意义。因此,我们可以通过对中美两国高中化学教材课后习题进行比较,找出值得我们借鉴和学习的地方,让中国教材习题跟上新课改的步伐。本研究选择的研究对象是现行普通高中课程标准实验教科书(人教版)化学必修1和必修2与美国主流化学教材的中译本《化学：概念与应用》两个版本的教材,主要对教材课后习题的测查内容、习题类型与数量和习题难度三个方面进行比较分析,根据比较的结果,得出一些编制设计教材习题的启示和建议。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous promotion and implementation of the reform of basic education in our country, chemistry teaching in middle schools has also undergone earth-shaking changes in the process of reform, and many advanced ideas have emerged in this process. As an important part of the textbook, the after-class exercises have also changed a lot, the types of exercises have increased, the function of exercises has changed, and the teaching methods of exercises have also changed to a certain extent. However, it is found that there are some defects in the compilation and setting of the exercises after class, and there is still a certain gap with the requirements of the new curriculum reform. The American chemistry curriculum has experienced several major reforms in its history, and now the development is approaching maturity. The result of the American chemistry curriculum reform has made the function of the American chemistry textbooks more perfect after class exercises, and the preparation of after-class exercises more reasonable. This has certain reference significance to the compilation of the chemistry textbook exercises after class in our country. Therefore, we can compare the exercises of Chinese and American senior high school chemistry textbooks after class, find out the places that we should learn from and let the Chinese textbook exercises keep up with the pace of the new curriculum reform. The research object of this study is the two versions of the current experimental textbook of current high school curriculum standard (human education version): chemistry compulsory 1 and compulsory 2 and the Chinese translation of the mainstream American chemistry textbook "Chemistry: concept and Application", two versions of the textbook, "Chemistry: concept and Application", are used in this study. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the contents, types and quantity of exercises and the difficulty of exercises after class. According to the results of comparison, some enlightenment and suggestions for compiling and designing textbook exercises are obtained.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G633.8

【相似文献】