高中《英语》（人教版）教材与学生需求分析

发布时间：2018-06-23 06:13

本文选题：英语教材分析 + 人教版　；参考：《闽南师范大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：教材是外语教学的核心因素。在中国这样缺乏外语语言学习的环境下,教材无论是对教师还是对学习者来说都是至关重要的。面对各种各样的教材,大多数的一线教师都感到喜忧参半。大家对百花齐放的教材局面感到开心,但同时也为不能很好地处理教材感到担忧和困惑。因此,客观、全面地认识教材是教师有效使用教材的前提条件。自九十年代初以来,外语界的学者们越来越关注学生的需要。教材作为实现教学大纲和英语课程的重要媒介,除了应该满足教学大纲的要求和英语教学规律,更应该要满足学生的需求。本研究通过对城市一级达标校、城市二级达标校和农村中学学生的调查,试图探讨高中《英语》(2007人教版)教材的使用情况及学生的需求状况。运用定量定性的方式回答以下两个问题:1.学生和教师对高中《英语》(人教版)这套教材的看法是怎么样的?城市学校和农村学校是否有区别?城市一级达标校和城市二级达标校是否有区别?2.根据学习者的需求,他们心目中的教材应该是怎么样的?从学生关于教材使用情况调查问卷涵盖的26个问题和几位学生的访谈我们可以得出以下结论:人教版高中英语教材在城市中学的使用情况比在农村中学的使用情况较好。城市中学的学生认为该套教材的练习与任务不能达到他们的需求。而农村中学的学生认为该套教材不能引起他们学习英语的兴趣并且实用性也不强。他们认为该套教材的内容与他们目前的语言水平不一致。从教师关于教材使用情况调查问卷涵盖的24个问题和几位教师的访谈我们可以得出以下结论:许多教师认为教材的内容容量无论是对教师还是对学生来说都太大,且教材的大部分内容都是关于城市生活内容和生活方式,而这些话题对于农村学生来说就比较陌生,学习起来就很困难;教材对听力和翻译的要求过高而对口语和阅读的要求过低;初高中教材内容上衔接不起来;有些教材内容已经过时;教材不利于培养学生的自学能力和创新能力,等等。从学生需求调查问卷结果分析,我们可以得出以下结论:无论是城市中学的学生还是农村中学的学生都希望教材应该是实用而有趣的。它应该包含与他们日常生活密切相关、真实和多样化的主题。此外,教材的难度不应超过学生的语言学习能力。分析存在问题,笔者根据学生需求问卷调查对教材更好的使用和改革提出了具体的建议,具体如下:1.对教材编者提出的建议:加强与初中的衔接;选材内容贴近学生生活,提高学生的兴趣;提高教材的实用性;充分考虑不同地区学生的学习水平差异。2.对高中英语教师提出的建议:对教材内容进行科学地处理;调整教学的顺序;改变教学方法。当然,本论文也存在诸多的不足之处。首先,参与者的数量相对较少。其次,笔者只研究了人教版高中英语这套教材,而对全国范围内其他版本的高中英语教材没有研究。最后,调查问卷的设计还缺乏一定的客观性和全面性,有些问题反应的不够全面。
[Abstract]:Teaching material is the core factor in foreign language teaching. In the environment of lack of foreign language learning in China, teaching materials are very important for both teachers and learners. Facing all kinds of teaching materials, most of the teachers feel happy. Therefore, the objective and comprehensive understanding of teaching materials is the prerequisite for the effective use of teaching materials. Since the beginning of the 90s, the scholars in the foreign language community have paid more and more attention to the needs of the students. As an important medium for the implementation of the syllabus and English courses, the teaching materials should be satisfied with the syllabus. The requirement and the law of English teaching should be more to meet the needs of the students. Through the investigation of the first grade standard school in the city, the two grade standard school in the city and the students in the rural middle school, this study tries to explore the use of the teaching materials of the high school < English > (2007 Party Edition) and the needs of the students. The following two questions are answered by means of quantitative and qualitative methods: 1. studies What are the differences between urban and rural schools? Is there any difference between city school and rural school? Is there any difference between the first grade school and the two grade school in the city? 2. what are the textbooks in their mind according to the needs of the learners? From the students' questionnaire on the use of textbooks The following 26 questions and interviews with several students can draw the following conclusions: the use of high school English textbooks in urban middle schools is better than that in rural middle schools. Students in urban middle schools think the practice and task of the set of textbooks can not meet their needs. They do not arouse their interest in learning English and are not very practical. They think the content of the textbook is not consistent with their current language level. From the 24 questions covered by the teacher's questionnaire on the use of textbooks and interviews with a few teachers, we can draw the following conclusion: many teachers think the content of the teaching material has no capacity. It is too big for teachers and students, and most of the contents of the teaching materials are about urban life content and life style. These topics are more strange to the rural students and difficult to learn; the requirements for listening and translation are too high and the requirements for language and reading are too low; the contents of the teaching materials in the early and high school are on the content. The content of some textbooks is out of date; the teaching material is not conducive to the cultivation of students' self-learning ability and innovation ability. From the results of the student needs questionnaire, we can draw the following conclusions: both the students in the urban middle school and the students in the rural middle school hope that the teaching materials should be practical and interesting. It should be included. In addition, the difficulty of teaching materials should not exceed the language learning ability of the students. In addition, the difficulty of teaching materials should not exceed the students' language learning ability. In the light of the questionnaire survey on the students' needs, the author puts forward some specific suggestions on the better use and reform of the teaching materials, such as 1. suggestions for the editor of the textbook: strengthen and junior high school. The material is close to the students' life, improve the students' interest, improve the students' interest, improve the practicality of the teaching materials, and take full account of the differences between the students in different regions and the differences in the learning level of the students in different regions.2.: to deal with the content of the teaching materials scientifically; to adjust the order of teaching and to change the teaching method. In the first place, the number of participants is relatively small. Secondly, the author only studies the teaching material of high school English, but does not study the other versions of the high school English textbooks throughout the country. Finally, the design of the questionnaire is still lack of objectivity and comprehensiveness, and some problems are not comprehensive enough.
【学位授予单位】：闽南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G633.41

【相似文献】