当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 高中教育论文 >

集团化办学模式下的委托管理研究

发布时间:2018-07-14 10:56
【摘要】:随着社会经济的发展,人们对于教育资源的需求与日俱增,但是由于各种原因,我国基础教育的发展很不均衡,优质资源相对稀缺。基础教育的发展在区域之间的不均衡性差异非常明显,这种不均衡不仅表现在不同区域之间,在一定区域内部,也有很大的不均衡。这种教育不均衡不仅促成了"择校热",也极大的损害了教育的公平性。为了促进基础教育的均衡发展,盘活教育资源,提高其利用率,全国各地区都进行了相应的教育改革和实践。较为显著的有教育联盟、教育帮扶、互助学校、手拉手学校、教育集团、委托管理等多种办学形式,其中集团化办学模式最为显著。集团化办学就是以一所优质学校为核心,整合多个相对薄弱学校,形成一个跨越区域、覆盖各个不同教育阶段的教育综合体。在集团内部,各个分校和核心校的关系分为不同类型。这种不同的关系类型导致集团对于分校的管理方式也不同。其一为核心校和分校共有一个法人代表,这种关系类型采用的管理方式为紧密型的直接管理,其二为分校是独立法人,并有自己的法人代表,这种关系类型所采用的管理形式为松散的委托管理。委托管理是集团化办学中经常采用的一种管理形式。本研究通过对现有的文献资料进行分析和委托管理的实践调研,对委托管理进行了探索,以期为教育领域的学者和实践者提供一定的借鉴。委托管理解决了学校的行政归属问题,在一定程度上带动了被托管学校的发展,但是被托管学校作为一个特殊的利益相关者,在管理决策、文化冲突、绩效考评等方面面临着管理困境。要解决委托管理的管理困境,笔者认为应该从管理制度入手,构建起管理决策机制、信息沟通机制、绩效考评机制。只有先构建好科学的组织机制,才能推动被托管学校的发展,从而达到集团化办学的核心目的。
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy, the demand for educational resources is increasing day by day. However, because of various reasons, the development of basic education in our country is very uneven, and the high-quality resources are relatively scarce. The development of basic education is very different from one region to another, which is not only shown in different regions, but also in a certain region. This kind of educational imbalance not only contributes to the "school selection fever", but also greatly impairs the fairness of education. In order to promote the balanced development of basic education, activate the educational resources and improve the utilization rate, the corresponding educational reform and practice have been carried out in all regions of the country. There are many kinds of educational alliance, educational aid, mutual aid school, hand-in-hand school, educational group, entrustment management and so on, among which the group school running mode is the most significant. Collectivization of running a school is to take a high-quality school as the core, integrate a number of relatively weak schools, and form an educational complex that spans the region and covers different stages of education. Within the group, the relationships between each branch and core school are divided into different types. This kind of relationship causes the group to manage the way to branch school also different. One is that the core school and the campus have a legal person representative, the other is that the school is an independent legal person and has its own legal person representative, the management mode of this kind of relationship is the direct management of the tight type, the second is that the branch school is an independent legal person and has its own legal person representative. The management form of this kind of relationship is loose delegation management. The entrustment management is a kind of management form which is often used in the collectivization school running. Based on the analysis of the existing literature and the practice of entrustment management, this study explores the entrustment management in order to provide some reference for the scholars and practitioners in the field of education. Entrustment management solves the problem of administrative ownership of the school, to a certain extent, promotes the development of the trusteeship school, but as a special stakeholder, the trusteeship school is in the management decision-making, cultural conflict, Performance evaluation and other aspects are facing management difficulties. In order to solve the management dilemma of entrustment management, the author thinks that we should start with the management system and construct the management decision-making mechanism, information communication mechanism and performance appraisal mechanism. Only by constructing scientific organization mechanism can we promote the development of trusteeship schools and achieve the core goal of collectivization.
【学位授予单位】:中央民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G639.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 孟繁华;张蕾;佘勇;;试论我国基础教育集团化办学的三大模式[J];教育研究;2016年10期

2 陈磊;;组织文化理论在教育集团管理中的应用[J];教育现代化;2016年11期

3 张静;张振笋;唐盛仙;;我国学校委托管理模式比较分析[J];经营管理者;2016年12期

4 刘华锦;叶正茂;;学校委托管理的内涵、举措和走向[J];教育评论;2016年02期

5 谈松华;;集团化办学的几点建议[J];人民教育;2015年19期

6 刘莉莉;;集团化办学的理性审视[J];教育发展研究;2015年18期

7 廖彩之;;农村委托管理学校校园文化建设实践与思考——以成都市SY学校为例[J];内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版);2015年08期

8 杨志成;;依法授权 规范运行 优化中小学集团化学校治理体系[J];中小学管理;2015年02期

9 陈颖;;内部专项督导评估:推动教育集团可持续发展[J];中小学管理;2014年11期

10 邱锦泉;;委托管理办学模式下促进教师专业发展的途径思考[J];社会心理科学;2014年04期

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 毛亚庆;;集团化办学效用如何保证[N];中国教育报;2016年

2 胡卫;;集团化不能偏离了均衡的“轨”[N];中国教育报;2016年

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 李文同;学校委托管理成效维持的个案研究[D];上海师范大学;2015年

2 邵文斌;上海市农村义务教育学校“委托管理”效能研究[D];华东师范大学;2013年

3 贺香君;英国“教育行动区计划”研究[D];四川师范大学;2010年



本文编号:2121422

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2121422.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8cdb9***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com