高中物理电学主题过程性评价研究
[Abstract]:The evaluation of students' learning is a very important part of educational activities, but the defects of traditional evaluation show that it can not promote the development of students. With the deepening of the basic education curriculum reform, the country has issued a variety of educational reform programs, all of which highlight the reform of evaluation, emphasize the establishment of a scientific evaluation system, and pay attention to the evaluation of students' learning process. Emphasis is placed on the role of evaluation in promoting the development of students. Process evaluation is an evaluation to promote the implementation of students' learning, is an evaluation of the learning process, is an evaluation of the implementation of the learning process. It is the result of the continuous development of educational evaluation theory and the increasingly rich practice of educational evaluation, which fully embodies the development function of evaluation. Many educators have made deep research on the background, theoretical basis, connotation, methods, characteristics, implementation process, advantages and disadvantages of process evaluation. However, it is a pity that the existing research results of process evaluation are limited to theoretical research, and few of them are combined with the specific teaching contents of specific subjects. This makes the concept of process evaluation good, but the lack of operability in teaching practice, the advanced educational concept in teaching practice is difficult to play its due role. However, with the deepening of curriculum reform, the state, society and schools put forward higher and more specific requirements for process evaluation. How to combine the process evaluation with the specific content of the specific subject, so as to give full play to the role of evaluation to promote the development of students, such a problem is urgent. Considering the limitations of research time and practical conditions, this study chooses the core content of physics in senior high school and the electrical subject which students encounter more problems in their study. In this study, teachers and students were investigated by questionnaire to find out the status quo of the process evaluation of electrical science in senior high school. Through the analysis of the questionnaire, we can find that based on the importance of electrical subject, both teachers and students have put forward more and more higher requirements for evaluation, pay attention to process evaluation, but more focused on the concept. The practical operation ability of process evaluation is insufficient. On the basis of the questionnaire, combined with a large number of literature research and discussion with teachers, this paper constructs the implementation system of senior high school electrical subject process evaluation, which includes the content, evaluation method and evaluation implementation strategy of electrical subject process evaluation. Among them, the content of evaluation elaborates the evaluation content of electrical subject from three aspects: knowledge and skill, process and method, emotion, attitude and value. In the evaluation method, there are 9 kinds of methods commonly used in process evaluation. Combined with the content of electrical subject, the evaluation strategy is expounded from three aspects: combination and optimization of methods, teaching design and evaluation proportion. Finally, through the teaching practice case of electrical subject, this paper makes an empirical study on the implementation system of process evaluation. The feedback from teachers and students shows that the implementation system lists in detail the contents of the process evaluation of electrical subject, the evaluation methods are diversified and very specific, and the evaluation strategy has good guidance and suggestions for the specific implementation. That is, the implementation system has good maneuverability and can effectively guide the implementation of process evaluation. In a word, through the research of the process evaluation of electrical subject, this paper proves that the process evaluation can be carried out well in the concrete teaching content, and improves the operability of the process evaluation of physics. Of course, the process of evaluation is still in a process of continuous exploration and development.
【学位授予单位】:西南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:G633.7
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 尹传侠;;浅析过程性评价[J];宿州教育学院学报;2011年05期
2 赢予;;体育课过程性评价的优劣解析[J];中国学校体育;2006年07期
3 钱倩;;信息科技课程基于网络的过程性评价[J];现代教学;2010年Z1期
4 ;信息科技学科过程性评价的实践[J];现代教学;2010年Z1期
5 穆可辉,谷芳;体育课过程性评价的方法[J];中国学校体育;2004年05期
6 高凌飚;关于过程性评价的思考[J];课程.教材.教法;2004年10期
7 石洁;对历史教学中实施过程性评价的思考[J];学科教育;2004年04期
8 韩健,史松涛;过程性评价的重要意义[J];南京体育学院学报(社会科学版);2004年05期
9 高凌飚;过程性评价的理念和功能[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2004年06期
10 钟媚;过程性评价:概念、范围与实施[J];当代教育科学;2005年14期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 王芳;;试论综合实践活动课程过程性评价实施需要注意的几个问题[A];中国教育学会基础教育评价专业委员会2012年学术年会论文选集[C];2012年
2 吴有昌;高凌飚;;对数学学习过程性评价内容与实施的思考[A];全国高师会数学教育研究会2006年学术年会论文集[C];2006年
3 陈婕;;过程性评价在孝道教育活动中的运用——提高德育活动成效的案例研究[A];让传统美德代代相传——中华民族传统美德教育的理论与实践(第九卷)[C];2010年
4 杨亚萍;梁丰;熊波;陈文鑫;;机考在大学电类基础课程考试中的应用实践[A];中国电子教育学会高教分会2012年论文集[C];2012年
相关重要报纸文章 前7条
1 市开发区朱曹中心小学 徐继梅;浅谈过程性评价的运用[N];连云港日报;2009年
2 记者 柴葳;北大将过程性评价纳入招生考量[N];中国教育报;2011年
3 江苏靖江市刘国钧中学 王金红;高中过程性评价的理性思考[N];中国电脑教育报;2009年
4 全国中小学教师教育技术能力建设计划项目办公室 韩骏;过程性评价是如何实施的?[N];中国教育报;2006年
5 华南师范大学课程教材中心教授 高凌飚;注重过程性评价对学习的促进作用[N];中国教育报;2013年
6 天水市麦积区马跑泉中心学校 漆彦绪;重视过程性评价,促进学生自主学习[N];甘肃日报;2011年
7 武都区磨坝中心小学教师 陈丽;浅谈小学生科学素养的培养[N];陇南日报;2009年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 吕润美;新课程地理学习过程性评价研究[D];华东师范大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 郑丽红;过程性评价中教师研究的探讨[D];安徽师范大学;2007年
2 魏鹏;农村职业高中数学学习过程性评价的实验研究[D];四川师范大学;2015年
3 姜迎春;高中物理电学主题过程性评价研究[D];西南大学;2016年
4 陈晓霞;中等职业学校德育课过程性评价研究[D];上海师范大学;2016年
5 张炳意;小学数学新课程实施中学生数学学习过程性评价研究[D];西北师范大学;2003年
6 龚小龙;基于校本课程的中职学校课程过程性评价探究[D];华东师范大学;2010年
7 李红梅;在线学习的过程性评价设计[D];河北大学;2008年
8 黄韶斌;关于学生学习的过程性评价理论与方法探究[D];华南师范大学;2005年
9 左峰辉;对职业院校学生数学学习过程性评价的思考与研究[D];首都师范大学;2006年
10 刘丽颖;基础教育改革中过程性评价平台的构建与完善[D];云南师范大学;2008年
,本文编号:2131703
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2131703.html