教师书面纠正性反馈对高中生、高职生英文写作错误影响的对比研究
[Abstract]:In English learning, students' writing ability is an important embodiment of comprehensive language expression. However, students often make more or less mistakes in the process of English writing. Through the research of teachers' written corrective feedback, this paper discusses whether it can reduce students' English writing errors, and if they can, which kind of errors can be reduced more effectively for high school students and vocational students under which kind of corrective feedback. First, through the questionnaire survey, from the attitude view, the error correction demand, the way demand and the effective degree and so on dimension, understands the Nanjing Gaochun high school and the Nanjing engineering higher vocational school student's overall writing present situation. Then, an experiment is carried out on each class of 2015 of Nanjing Gaochun High School and Nanjing higher Vocational School. Students in each class were divided into three groups: direct feedback group, indirect tagging feedback group and indirect underlined feedback group. Using Carl James's error classification method for reference, students' English writing errors are classified into ontology errors, lexical errors, grammatical errors and textual errors, and the quantitative statistics of English writing errors are carried out. Finally, using EXCEL and SPSS19.0 software, the author makes a comparative analysis of all kinds of writing errors in high school students and vocational college students before and after testing. Based on the relevant theories of psychology, such as "reinforcement" and "attention", the questionnaire data and experimental data are analyzed and discussed. The results show that: (1) Direct feedback contributes to the reduction of English writing among senior high school students. Two kinds of indirect feedback contribute to the reduction of English writing errors of vocational college students; (2) Noumenon errors and textual errors are the most easily corrected ones. Considering the teachers' time and energy and the students' attention, indirect underlined feedback is the best. (3) the lexical errors have no significant improvement in the three ways of feedback. Further research is needed. It is hoped that the results of this paper will be helpful to the English teaching of English teachers as well as to the English writing of senior high school students and vocational students.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H319.3;G633.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 樊永美;;国内二语写作书面纠正性反馈研究述评[J];疯狂英语(教师版);2015年01期
2 苏建红;;认知因素、注意与书面纠正性反馈效果[J];西安外国语大学学报;2014年01期
3 姜琳;陈锦;;书面纠正性反馈与二语习得——针对英语类指名词短语用法的实证研究[J];当代外语研究;2013年11期
4 杨丽娟;杨曼君;张阳;;我国英语写作教学三种反馈方式的对比研究[J];外语教学;2013年03期
5 李竞;;英语写作教学中教师书面反馈效果的案例研究[J];外语界;2013年02期
6 陈晓湘;彭丽娜;郭兴荣;张姣;刘星;;聚焦和非聚焦书面反馈对英语非真实条件虚拟语气习得的影响[J];外语与外语教学;2013年02期
7 于书林;;教师反馈与同伴反馈——社会文化活动理论视角下的差异与融合[J];现代外语;2013年01期
8 胡俊;;大学生英语应用文写作错误类型与教师的反馈方式探讨[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2012年01期
9 李竞;;中国学生英语写作中教师书面反馈特征与学生反应的案例研究[J];外语界;2011年06期
10 蒋霞;曾路;;大学英语教师书面反馈作业行为的效率——新视角下的实证研究[J];山东外语教学;2011年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 王珊珊;高中生英语写作中母语负迁移问题及其矫正策略研究[D];上海师范大学;2014年
2 金香花;中国朝鲜族大学生英语写作中动词错误分析[D];延边大学;2010年
3 李家远;教师“亲和力”和教育教学效果有效性的研究[D];苏州大学;2009年
,本文编号:2358606
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2358606.html