高考历史新课标全国卷第40题学科能力考查研究
[Abstract]:Since 1990s, the history of college entrance examination began to attach importance to the examination of historical thinking ability, which aroused the infinite vitality of history teaching in middle schools. At the beginning of the 21st century, a new round of basic education curriculum reform started, humanistic literacy became the core of history education. Ability training is an important part of humanistic accomplishment, and has become an important goal of history education in middle schools. Under this goal, mastering history knowledge is no longer the sole and final purpose of history teaching. Training and mastering the basic method of history learning and cultivating history discipline ability have gained unprecedented attention in order to further improve the humanities accomplishment. Accordingly, the new curriculum standard history college entrance examination, on the basis of not giving up the history knowledge examination as the foundation, pays more attention to the history subject ability examination. Under the guidance of history curriculum standard, the proposition of college entrance examination, which emphasizes "ability-oriented and accomplishment-oriented", has become one of the major characteristics of the history examination paper of college entrance examination all over the country in recent years. In propositional thinking, using "new materials, new situations" to create "new problems", to examine memory, observation, imagination and contrast, analysis, synthesis, induction, generalization and other basis of historical reading, historical understanding, historical interpretation, and so on, on the basis of historical reading, historical understanding, historical interpretation, etc. Historical evaluation and other disciplines are the main form of ability examination. Longitudinally, the ability tests generally maintain stability, consistency, but also slight changes. An in-depth analysis of the various abilities in the history test questions of the college entrance examination in recent years, grasping the characteristics and directions of the proposition, can guide history teaching in middle schools. Therefore, this paper attempts to take item 40 of National New Curriculum Standard of National College entrance examination from 2011 to 2016 as an example, and makes a full sample study of 11 questions in the last six years, analyzes the ideas, skills and core competence requirements of its proposition, and probes into its longitudinal development track. This paper consists of four chapters: the first chapter is the introduction of the article, which mainly expounds the purpose and significance of the research on the subject ability of item 40 of the National New Curriculum Standard of the National College entrance examination, and summarizes the general situation of the research of the history subject ability and the history examination paper of the college entrance examination in recent years. The second chapter is about the ability of history discipline. Go deep into the historical theory level, explore the historical research needs to have the ability and accomplishment, thus extends to the middle school history education, combs the history discipline ability category and the level, analyzes the college entrance examination guidance document to the ability request, For the next chapter of the test questions to do the theoretical groundwork. In the third chapter, the author makes a full sample study on item 40 of National New Curriculum Standard of National College entrance examination from 2011 to 2016, and analyzes the examination of history subject ability in item 40 of National Standard of New Curriculum Standard in recent 6 years, as well as the change and deficiency of longitudinal development. The fourth chapter, the enlightenment to the middle school history teaching and learning. On the basis of reflecting on the deficiency of the new curriculum reform and analyzing the trend of the curriculum reform, this paper puts forward some suggestions from two aspects, namely, teaching and learning, so as to deal with the relationship between teaching and learning reasonably.
【学位授予单位】:西华师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G633.51
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 马自玲;;突出“能力主导”,彰显“素养立意”——近年新课标高考历史全国卷述评[J];历史教学(上半月刊);2016年03期
2 汪瀛;;近年高考新课标全国文综卷Ⅰ历史试题的学习启示[J];中学政史地(高中文综);2015年11期
3 赵利剑;;创设情境 考查能力——2015年高考历史试题(全国新课标文科综合卷Ⅰ、Ⅱ)评析与指导[J];基础教育课程;2015年21期
4 刘松柏;陈辉;;古今要贯通、中外须兼顾——评2015年全国卷试题结构对高中历史教学的启示[J];历史教学(上半月刊);2015年11期
5 朱可;;中学历史教学应该注重史学评价能力的培养——兼评2015年浙江省文科综合试卷历史试题[J];历史教学(上半月刊);2015年07期
6 张汉林;;历史、历史学与历史教育[J];中学历史教学参考;2015年09期
7 郑林;;中学生历史学科能力表现及测评初探[J];历史教学(上半月刊);2015年05期
8 李艳洁;;2014年高考全国卷文综40题(历史)分析[J];内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版);2014年12期
9 孙立田;任世江;;论历史思维能力分类体系[J];历史教学(上半月刊);2014年06期
10 韩京里;;2013年高考新课标全国Ⅰ卷文综历史试题解析及备考建议[J];中学政史地(高中文综);2013年Z2期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 刘冰玉;三十年历史高考试卷内容变化分析[D];华东师范大学;2008年
2 王正瀚;我国中学历史科国家课程标准中能力目标研究[D];上海师范大学;2008年
,本文编号:2461526
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2461526.html