苏科版两个版本初中教材的比较研究
发布时间：2019-05-23 03:53
【摘要】：我国于2001年正式颁布和实施了义务教育数学课程标准,对数学教学的教学目标、理念等内容提出了具体的要求,各个地区也根据课程标准进行了教材的编写,为促进数学教学质量的提高和发展做出了重要贡献。但随着时代的进步和发展,我国在2001版课程标准基础上对其进行了大面积的修改和完善,于2011年制定颁布了《全日制义务教育数学课程标准(2011年版)》,其对教学目标、理念和要求进行了重要的修改,各大版本的教材也因此进行了修订和重新编写。而新教材与原来基础的旧教材在各个方面出现了明显的不同要求,也对教师的教学提出了更高的要求。基于此,笔者提出了对于苏科版初中数学新教材与实验版进行比较研究。本文通过采用文献分析法、比较分析法和案例分析法等研究方法,对两个版本教材的教学目标、教学结构、教学内容、教学内容展示方式以及教材的习题和例题进行比较研究。研究结论:(1)新教材教学目标更加全面具体,更加关注和尊重学生;(2)新教材在实验版教材基础上对教学结构进行了细微的调整;(3)两个版本教材教学内容大致一样,新教材新增了部分新的教学内容;(4)新教材的教学内容展示方式更加贴近学生和更加生活化;(5)新教材的例题素材更加注重生活和社会问题,习题种类更加丰富、难度有所提升。对于教材的使用提出两点建议:一是要转变教学观点和改建教学方式;二是要对教材进行二次开发和研究。
[Abstract]:In 2001, China formally promulgated and implemented the mathematics curriculum standard of compulsory education, put forward specific requirements for the teaching objectives and concepts of mathematics teaching, and compiled teaching materials in various regions according to the curriculum standards. It has made important contributions to the improvement and development of mathematics teaching quality. However, with the progress and development of the times, China has revised and improved it on the basis of the 2001 edition of the curriculum standard, and formulated and promulgated the Mathematics Curriculum Standard for full-time compulsory Education (2011 Edition) in 2011, which aims at teaching. Important changes have been made to the concept and requirements, and the major versions of the teaching materials have been revised and rewritten as a result. However, the new teaching materials and the original basic old teaching materials have obvious different requirements in all aspects, and also put forward higher requirements for teachers' teaching. Based on this, the author puts forward a comparative study between the new junior high school mathematics textbook and the experimental version. By using the methods of literature analysis, comparative analysis and case analysis, this paper makes a comparative study on the teaching objectives, teaching structure, teaching content display methods, exercises and examples of the two versions of teaching materials. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the teaching objectives of the new teaching materials are more comprehensive and concrete, and the students are paid more attention to and respected. (2) the teaching structure of the new teaching materials has been slightly adjusted on the basis of the experimental version of the teaching materials. (3) the teaching content of the two versions of the textbook is about the same, and some new teaching contents have been added to the new textbook. (4) the teaching content of the new textbook is more close to the students and more alive. (5) the sample material of the new textbook pays more attention to life and social problems, and the types of exercises are richer and the difficulty is improved. This paper puts forward two suggestions for the use of teaching materials: one is to change the teaching viewpoint and the other is to carry on the secondary development and research to the teaching materials.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G633.6
本文编号：2483577
[Abstract]:In 2001, China formally promulgated and implemented the mathematics curriculum standard of compulsory education, put forward specific requirements for the teaching objectives and concepts of mathematics teaching, and compiled teaching materials in various regions according to the curriculum standards. It has made important contributions to the improvement and development of mathematics teaching quality. However, with the progress and development of the times, China has revised and improved it on the basis of the 2001 edition of the curriculum standard, and formulated and promulgated the Mathematics Curriculum Standard for full-time compulsory Education (2011 Edition) in 2011, which aims at teaching. Important changes have been made to the concept and requirements, and the major versions of the teaching materials have been revised and rewritten as a result. However, the new teaching materials and the original basic old teaching materials have obvious different requirements in all aspects, and also put forward higher requirements for teachers' teaching. Based on this, the author puts forward a comparative study between the new junior high school mathematics textbook and the experimental version. By using the methods of literature analysis, comparative analysis and case analysis, this paper makes a comparative study on the teaching objectives, teaching structure, teaching content display methods, exercises and examples of the two versions of teaching materials. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the teaching objectives of the new teaching materials are more comprehensive and concrete, and the students are paid more attention to and respected. (2) the teaching structure of the new teaching materials has been slightly adjusted on the basis of the experimental version of the teaching materials. (3) the teaching content of the two versions of the textbook is about the same, and some new teaching contents have been added to the new textbook. (4) the teaching content of the new textbook is more close to the students and more alive. (5) the sample material of the new textbook pays more attention to life and social problems, and the types of exercises are richer and the difficulty is improved. This paper puts forward two suggestions for the use of teaching materials: one is to change the teaching viewpoint and the other is to carry on the secondary development and research to the teaching materials.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G633.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 王奋平;喻平;;英国高中数学教材知识整体结构设计研究——以CIE考试委员会A水平数学教材为例[J];数学教育学报;2013年05期
2 鲍建生;;关于数学学习理论研究的几点思考[J];浙江教育学院学报;2009年01期
3 王为峰;;对苏科版教材的讨论和建议[J];中学数学月刊;2006年01期
4 曹一鸣;义务教育数学课程改革及其争鸣问题[J];数学通报;2005年03期
5 张奠宙;关于“双基”的创新[J];小学青年教师;2003年06期
6 曹霞;影响课程实施的因素分析[J];安徽教育学院学报;2002年01期
7 顾明远;课程改革的世纪回顾与瞻望[J];教育研究;2001年07期
8 张玺恩,陈宏伯;我国建国以来中小学数学课程和教材的演化[J];课程.教材.教法;1988年10期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 任丹凤;中小学教科书编制设计的理论与实践研究[D];华东师范大学;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 周小请;中美小学数学教科书个案比较研究[D];上海师范大学;2009年
2 杭文韬;对中学数学教材情境问题的调查与研究[D];华东师范大学;2007年
3 冯育花;弗赖登塔尔数学教育思想的应用研究[D];云南师范大学;2006年
4 贾立忠;中、美中学数学课堂教学案例比较研究[D];东北师范大学;2006年
5 程玮;新课程下初中数学习题研究[D];首都师范大学;2006年
6 何聪;对北师大新编初中数学教材的分析与评价[D];广西师范大学;2006年
，本文编号：2483577
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2483577.html
