海峡两岸义务教育体育课程指导性文件的比较研究
发布时间：2019-06-11 00:31
【摘要】：海峡两岸同祖同源,虽因政治方面的原因导致了两地的分离,但有着共同文化背景和历史渊源的大陆与台湾地区近年来在文化与学术上的交流日益频繁。体育课程指导性文件是指导体育教学活动的理论指南,是学校体育开展的依据。以体育课程为依托洞悉两岸学校体育发展的相似与差异是两岸教育工作者的迫切需要。本文利用文献资料法、专家访谈法和比较分析法,对大陆地区与台湾地区1949年至今的中小学体育课程指导性文件进行了历史纵向脉络梳理比较分析和横向文本分析比较,结论如下：1.在1949-2000年期间,大陆地区共颁布了七部义务教育体育课程文件,台湾地区则颁布了九部国民中小学体育课程标准。在课程目标、教材内容等各个方面,充分展现出各自的历史继承的延续性与发展的时代性的特色。2.通过对1949年-2000年台湾与大陆地区各自出台的体育课程文件的历史纵向比较分析,总结出两岸地区教育改革与课程发展的规律：民族传统体育作为中华民族传统文化的重要组成部分一直是两岸体育课程构建的主要方面;两岸体育课程文件在与国际潮流相接的同时也保持着自己的本土化特色；以教育化取向为主的课程价值观成为20世纪末两岸课程文本制定的主要价值观取向；学生的身心全面发展越来越受到海峡两岸的重视,培养全面发展的人,是两岸体育课程目标体系构建的重要内容。3.通过对2011年大陆地区颁布的体育课程标准与台湾地区2008年颁布的体育课程纲要进行具体的横向文本比较,归纳出两岸中小学体育课程文件在课程理念、课程目标、课程内容与课程评价方面在精神实质上是高度相似的,但是在文件名称与水平划分上却具有明显差异性。同时,大陆地区结合各地学校体育发展水平不等的现状,形成了具有属于自己体育课程特色的体育课程资源的开发与利用、课程性质以及附录部分；台湾地区则在学生十大基本能力与学生分段能力指标的关系上做了说细的阐述,形成以学生核心能力统领整个课程纲要的体系建设。4.海峡两岸体育课程指导性文件的发展历程,为大陆地区义务教育体育课程今后的发展提出了思考：确定体育课程中学生学科核心素养；完善体育课程评价的有效性；强化体育课程的民族性与本土化；加强体育课程理念既要符合学生与时代的发展需求又要加强进一步细化研究；加强体育课程生活化建设。
[Abstract]:Although the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are of the same ancestor origin, although the separation of the two places has been caused by political reasons, the cultural and academic exchanges between the mainland and Taiwan, which share a common cultural background and historical origin, have become more and more frequent in recent years. The guiding document of physical education curriculum is the theoretical guide to guide physical education teaching activities and the basis for the development of school physical education. It is an urgent need for educators on both sides of the strait to understand the similarities and differences in the development of physical education in schools between the two sides of the strait based on the physical education curriculum. By using the methods of literature, expert interview and comparative analysis, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the historical longitudinal context and horizontal text analysis of the guiding documents of physical education curriculum in primary and secondary schools in mainland China and Taiwan since 1949. The conclusion is as follows: 1. From 1999 to 2000, seven compulsory physical education curriculum documents were promulgated in the mainland and nine national physical education curriculum standards in primary and secondary schools in Taiwan. In the curriculum objectives, teaching materials and other aspects, fully show the continuity of their own historical inheritance and the characteristics of the times of development. 2. Based on the vertical comparative analysis of the history of physical education curriculum documents issued by Taiwan and the mainland from 1949 to 2000, This paper summarizes the law of educational reform and curriculum development in cross-strait areas: as an important part of the traditional culture of the Chinese nation, national traditional sports has always been the main aspect of the construction of physical education curriculum on both sides of the strait; The cross-strait physical education curriculum documents not only connect with the international trend, but also maintain their own localization characteristics. At the end of the 20th century, the curriculum values based on the educational orientation became the main value orientation of the cross-strait curriculum text at the end of the 20th century. The all-round development of students' body and mind has been paid more and more attention by both sides of the Taiwan Strait. Cultivating people with all-round development is an important part of the construction of the target system of physical education curriculum on both sides of the strait. By comparing the physical education curriculum standards promulgated in mainland China in 2011 with the physical education curriculum outline promulgated in Taiwan in 2008, this paper sums up the curriculum concept and curriculum objectives of physical education curriculum documents in primary and secondary schools on both sides of the strait. The curriculum content and curriculum evaluation are highly similar in spirit, but there are obvious differences in the division of document name and level. At the same time, combined with the different development level of physical education in schools in mainland China, the development and utilization of physical education curriculum resources with their own physical education curriculum characteristics, the nature of the curriculum and the appendix parts have been formed. In Taiwan, the relationship between the ten basic abilities of students and the index of students' segmented ability is expounded in detail, and the system construction of guiding the whole curriculum outline with the core competence of students is formed. 4. The development course of physical education curriculum guidance document between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait puts forward some thoughts for the future development of compulsory education physical education curriculum in mainland China: to determine the core literacy of physical education curriculum students, to improve the effectiveness of physical education curriculum evaluation, and to improve the effectiveness of physical education curriculum evaluation. To strengthen the nationality and localization of physical education curriculum, to strengthen the concept of physical education curriculum should not only meet the development needs of students and the times, but also strengthen the further detailed research, and strengthen the life construction of physical education curriculum.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G633.96
本文编号：2496852
[Abstract]:Although the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are of the same ancestor origin, although the separation of the two places has been caused by political reasons, the cultural and academic exchanges between the mainland and Taiwan, which share a common cultural background and historical origin, have become more and more frequent in recent years. The guiding document of physical education curriculum is the theoretical guide to guide physical education teaching activities and the basis for the development of school physical education. It is an urgent need for educators on both sides of the strait to understand the similarities and differences in the development of physical education in schools between the two sides of the strait based on the physical education curriculum. By using the methods of literature, expert interview and comparative analysis, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the historical longitudinal context and horizontal text analysis of the guiding documents of physical education curriculum in primary and secondary schools in mainland China and Taiwan since 1949. The conclusion is as follows: 1. From 1999 to 2000, seven compulsory physical education curriculum documents were promulgated in the mainland and nine national physical education curriculum standards in primary and secondary schools in Taiwan. In the curriculum objectives, teaching materials and other aspects, fully show the continuity of their own historical inheritance and the characteristics of the times of development. 2. Based on the vertical comparative analysis of the history of physical education curriculum documents issued by Taiwan and the mainland from 1949 to 2000, This paper summarizes the law of educational reform and curriculum development in cross-strait areas: as an important part of the traditional culture of the Chinese nation, national traditional sports has always been the main aspect of the construction of physical education curriculum on both sides of the strait; The cross-strait physical education curriculum documents not only connect with the international trend, but also maintain their own localization characteristics. At the end of the 20th century, the curriculum values based on the educational orientation became the main value orientation of the cross-strait curriculum text at the end of the 20th century. The all-round development of students' body and mind has been paid more and more attention by both sides of the Taiwan Strait. Cultivating people with all-round development is an important part of the construction of the target system of physical education curriculum on both sides of the strait. By comparing the physical education curriculum standards promulgated in mainland China in 2011 with the physical education curriculum outline promulgated in Taiwan in 2008, this paper sums up the curriculum concept and curriculum objectives of physical education curriculum documents in primary and secondary schools on both sides of the strait. The curriculum content and curriculum evaluation are highly similar in spirit, but there are obvious differences in the division of document name and level. At the same time, combined with the different development level of physical education in schools in mainland China, the development and utilization of physical education curriculum resources with their own physical education curriculum characteristics, the nature of the curriculum and the appendix parts have been formed. In Taiwan, the relationship between the ten basic abilities of students and the index of students' segmented ability is expounded in detail, and the system construction of guiding the whole curriculum outline with the core competence of students is formed. 4. The development course of physical education curriculum guidance document between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait puts forward some thoughts for the future development of compulsory education physical education curriculum in mainland China: to determine the core literacy of physical education curriculum students, to improve the effectiveness of physical education curriculum evaluation, and to improve the effectiveness of physical education curriculum evaluation. To strengthen the nationality and localization of physical education curriculum, to strengthen the concept of physical education curriculum should not only meet the development needs of students and the times, but also strengthen the further detailed research, and strengthen the life construction of physical education curriculum.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G633.96
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 温洪泽;;海峡两岸体育健康课程标准比较研究[J];体育文化导刊;2015年06期
2 彭建敏;杜超;;体育课程标准取代教学大纲思考[J];体育文化导刊;2010年03期
3 王德慧;龚坚;杨玉茹;宋会君;;体育课程评价研究现状及发展趋势[J];首都体育学院学报;2008年05期
4 毛振明;赖天德;陈雁飞;马凌;;关于完善《体育(与健康)课程标准》的建议(上)——体育课程性质的表述和目标体系的讨论[J];体育学刊;2007年03期
5 江宇;;对我国体育课程价值观的追溯及解析[J];武汉体育学院学报;2007年01期
6 季浏,汪晓赞;《体育(与健康)课程标准》实验后的现状调查与分析[J];上海体育学院学报;2004年05期
7 胡东芳;论课程政策的定义、本质与载体[J];教育理论与实践;2001年11期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 王世红;台湾九年一贯课程研究[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2012年
2 张嘉六;海峡两岸小学体育课程改革之比较研究[D];苏州大学;2012年
，本文编号：2496852
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2496852.html
