当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 高中教育论文 >

干预式动态评价在高中英语写作教学中的应用研究

发布时间:2021-01-16 19:52
  在英语听、说、读、写四项技能中,写作是中国高中生在英语学习中最薄弱的环节,因此高中英语写作教学日益受到重视。其中写作评价的效果是影响高中英语写作教学的关键。然而,现阶段采用的写作评价方法多以静态评价,形成性评价为主,多是结果导向的评价方法,忽视写作过程。同时,传统的评价方法只着眼于学生当前的能力,而无法预测学生在未来发展中的潜能。为了更好地发挥写作评价对写作教学的指导作用,动态评价作为一种新的评价方法,以最近发展区理念为核心,将教学和评价相结合,预测学生的未来发展潜能,为二语写作评价领域注入新的活力。本文基于集教、学、评为一体的外语写作动态评价模型(孔文,2013),试图用多元化分析方法探究干预式动态评价对英语写作以及学生迁移能力的影响;同时将干预式动态评价和传统评价进行对比,以探究更高效的干预式动态评价实施方案。基于此,本文研究问题如下:(1)干预式动态评价是否能显著改善写作质量?(2)在改善写作质量方面,干预式动态评价和传统评价存在哪些共性和区别?(3)在提升学生的迁移能力5方面,干预式动态评价是否起到积极作用以及干预式动态评价和传统评价在这方面是否存在显著差异?围绕以上三个问题,... 

【文章来源】:山东师范大学山东省

【文章页数】:110 页

【学位级别】:硕士

【文章目录】:
Abstract
摘要
List of Abbreviations
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Study
    1.3 Structure of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Dynamic Assessment
        2.1.1 Differences between Dynamic Assessment and Traditional Evaluation
        2.1.2 Differences between Dynamic Assessment and Formative Assessment
        2.1.3 Researchers’Definitions of Dynamic Assessment
    2.2 Theoretical Foundations of Dynamic Assessment
        2.2.1 Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory
        2.2.2 Feuerstein’s Structural Cognitive Modifiability Theory and Mediated LearningExperience
    2.3 Major Models of Dynamic Assessment
        2.3.1 Interventionist Dynamic Assessment
        2.3.2 Interactionist Dynamic Assessment
    2.4 Studies on the Application of Interventionist Dynamic Assessment to Second LanguageInstruction Abroad and at Home
        2.4.1 Studies on the Application of Interventionist Dynamic Assessment to SecondLanguage Instruction Abroad
        2.4.2 Studies on the Application of Interventionist Dynamic Assessment to SecondLanguage Instruction at Home
Chapter Three Methodology
    3.1 Research Questions
    3.2 Participants
    3.3 Instruments
        3.3.1 The English Written Task of Senior High School
        3.3.2 Model of Interventionist Dynamic Assessment in Foreign Language Writing
        3.3.3 A Freeware Tool for Profiling the Vocabulary Level and Complexity of Texts
    3.4 Research Procedure
    3.5 Data Collection and Data Analysis
        3.5.1 Data Collection
        3.5.2 Data Analysis
            3.5.2.1 Measures of Lexical Complexity
            3.5.2.2 Measures of Syntactic Complexity
Chapter Four Results and Discussion
    4.1 The Influence of Interventionist Dynamic Assessment On Writing Quality
        4.1.1 The Influence of Interventionist Dynamic Assessment on the Complexity ofWritings
            4.1.1.1 Lexical Complexity
            4.1.1.2 Syntactic Complexity
        4.1.2 The Influence of Interventionist Dynamic Assessment on the Vocabulary and WordFrequency of Writings
    4.2 Differences and Similarities between Traditional Evaluation and Interventionist DynamicAssessment with regard to Improving Writing Quality
        4.2.1 The Influence of Traditional Evaluation on the Complexity of Writings
            4.2.1.1 Lexical Complexity
            4.2.1.2 Syntactic Complexity
        4.2.2 The Comparison about Students’Initial Writing Abilities with regard toComplexity of Writings
            4.2.2.1 Lexical Complexity
            4.2.2.2 Syntactic Complexity
        4.2.3 The Comparison between Traditional Evaluation and Interventionist DynamicAssessment with regard to Improving Complexity of Writings
            4.2.3.1 Lexical Complexity
            4.2.3.2 Syntactic Complexity
    4.3 The Analysis of Students’Transfer Ability about Complexity of Writings
        4.3.1 The Influence of Interventionist Dynamic Assessment on Students’TransferAbility in respect of Complexity of Writings
            4.3.1.1 Lexical Complexity
            4.3.1.2 Syntactic Complexity
        4.3.2 The Comparison between Traditional Evaluation and Interventionist DynamicAssessment in terms of Improving Transfer Ability about Complexity of Writings
            4.3.2.1 Lexical Complexity
            4.3.2.2 Syntactic Complexity
    4.4 A Report of Interventionist Dynamic Assessment on English Writing
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Pedagogical Implications
    5.3 Limitations and Suggestions
Bibliography
AppendixⅠ
AppendixⅡ
AppendixⅢ
Publication
Acknowledgement


【参考文献】:
期刊论文
[1]国外语言动态评价的最新研究[J]. 刘森,武尊民.  现代外语. 2017(06)
[2]基于核心素养的基础教育评价改革[J]. 辛涛,姜宇.  中国教育学刊. 2017(04)
[3]基于动态评价理论的英语语言学课程评价模式研究[J]. 李丹弟.  外语界. 2015(06)
[4]基于动态评估理论的英语写作反馈方式比较研究[J]. 李奕华.  外语界. 2015(03)
[5]动态评估视阈下基于外语课堂的教师干预[J]. 张艳红.  外语测试与教学. 2014(04)
[6]英语写作的词汇丰富性发展特征——一项基于自建语料库的纵贯研究[J]. 朱慧敏,王俊菊.  外语界. 2013(06)
[7]L2写作动态评估中同伴中介干预和教师中介干预比较研究[J]. 孔文,李敦东,余国兴.  外语界. 2013(03)
[8]动态评价理论在英语过程写作教学中的运用[J]. 何晔.  中国大学教学. 2013(06)
[9]另类评估的新发展:动态评估面面观[J]. 孔文,方洁.  解放军外国语学院学报. 2013(01)
[10]二语写作理论、教学与评估研究五十年[J]. 孔文,郭泉江.  外语测试与教学. 2012(04)

博士论文
[1]大学英语写作教学的动态评价研究[D]. 张艳红.上海外国语大学 2012
[2]动态评估理论与应用研究[D]. 范兆兰.南京师范大学 2006
[3]维果茨基对现代西方心理学的影响[D]. 麻彦坤.南京师范大学 2005

硕士论文
[1]动态评估在高中英语写作教学中的应用研究[D]. 解纯杰.山东师范大学 2018
[2]社会文化理论在国际汉语教学中的应用研究[D]. 赵星星.陕西师范大学 2018
[3]动态评价在高中英语写作教学中的应用研究[D]. 费健.南京师范大学 2017
[4]基于最近发展区理论的纠正性反馈对高中生英语写作能力影响的研究[D]. 赵斯文.北京师范大学 2016
[5]英语写作动态评估过程的微变化研究[D]. 李利英.四川外国语大学 2015
[6]干预式动态评价对学困生英语口语能力影响的个案研究[D]. 陈玢.华中师范大学 2014



本文编号:2981429

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2981429.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6f8a4***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com