无知之幕下的“虚拟社会保险”方案

发布时间：2018-06-27 16:29

  本文选题：罗尔斯 + 海萨尼　； 参考：《世界哲学》2017年01期

【摘要】：理性选择理论与伦理学的结合被研究者们从不同进路加以发展。罗尔斯与海萨尼主要是从无知之幕或不确定条件下理性选择的角度出发来证成正义原则。但是,他们从一个相似的选择背景却得出了不同的结论———罗尔斯的平等主义与海萨尼的平均功利主义。本文的目的则是在理性选择理论的框架下发展出一套"虚拟社会保险"方案来解决这二者之间的分歧。笔者将论证,如果无知之幕下的各方将海萨尼主张的预期效用最大化原则作为决策规则,他们会选择加入一个"虚拟社会保险",即达成一个要求将所有基本善进行平等分配的罗尔斯原则。
[Abstract]:The combination of rational choice theory and ethics has been developed in different ways. Rawls and Heisani mainly from the perspective of ignorance or rational choice under uncertain conditions to prove the principle of justice. However, they draw different conclusions from a similar background-Rawls' egalitarianism and Heisani's average utilitarianism. The purpose of this paper is to develop a "virtual social insurance" scheme under the framework of rational choice theory to resolve the difference between the two. The author will argue that if the parties under the veil of ignorance take the principle of maximizing expected utility advocated by Heisani as the decision-making rule, They would choose to add a "virtual social insurance", a Rawls principle requiring the equal distribution of all basic good.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学哲学院;
【分类号】：C934
，

本文编号：2074525