中国人力资源错配问题研究
发布时间:2018-06-03 16:18
本文选题:人力资源 + 资源错配 ; 参考:《华东师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文在Brandt,Tombe and Zhu(2013)的理论框架的基础上,将生产函数形式扩展为包含低技术劳动力和高技术劳动力的柯布-道格拉斯生产函数,测算了中国1993-2012年国有单位和非国有单位之间的资源错配程度和各省之间的资源错配程度及其变化路径,并分析了导致人力资源错配的具体原因及其应对策略。实证发现,2000年以后中国的资源错配程度总体上不断下降,尤其是2000-2007年资源错配程度下降较快,资源配置效率明显提高,这是由国有单位和非国有单位之间资本配置效率的提高所主导。1997-2003年各省之间资源错配程度有所上升,2004年以后略有下降,这主要体现为低技术劳动力和高技术劳动力在各省之间配置效率的变化。资本和低技术劳动力错配程度较高,高技术劳动力错配程度较低。各省之间资本错配对资本总错配的贡献程度越来越大。低技术劳动力的错配总体上体现为低技术劳动力在各省之间的错配。2001年以后高技术劳动力的错配总体上体现为高技术劳动力在各省之间的错配。1996-2004年高技术劳动力在国有单位和非国有单位之间的配置效率大幅提高,2005年以后配置效率没有明显变化。1996-2001年高技术劳动力在各省之间的配置效率略有下降,但是2002年以后配置效率逐渐提高。国企改革、对外开放是人力资源在国有单位和非国有单位之间配置效率提高的主要原因。追求区域经济总量平衡的政策、市场分割和户籍制度是导致中国人力资源在地区之间配置效率恶化的主要原因。为提高人力资源的配置效率,应该逐步消除由行政垄断导致的进入壁垒,通过市场化改革提高国有企业生产效率,推动金融体系市场化改革以解决民营企业融资约束问题,从追求区域经济总量平衡的政策转向追求区域人均收入水平均衡的政策,取消户籍政策,采用能更加全面反映经济社会发展质量的官员政绩考核标准以打破地方保护主义和市场分割。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the theoretical framework of Brandt, Tombe and Zhu (2013), this paper extends the production function form to the Cobb Douglas production function containing low technical labor force and high technical labor force, and calculates the mismatch degree of resources between state-owned and non-state units in China for 1993-2012 years and the degree of mismatch between the provinces and their resources. The specific reasons for the misallocation of human resources and their coping strategies are analyzed. It is found that the degree of misallocation of resources in China has declined since 2000, especially in the 2000-2007 Years, and the allocation efficiency of resources is greatly improved, which is the capital allocation between state-owned and non-state-owned units. The degree of mismatch between the provinces led to the increase in efficiency has risen in the.1997-2003 year, and a slight decline after 2004. This is mainly reflected in the change in the allocation efficiency between the low skilled labor force and the high-tech labor force among the provinces. The mismatch degree of capital and low technology labor force is high, the mismatch of high technology labor force is low. The mismatch of this mismatch is becoming more and more important in the total mismatch of capital. The mismatch of the low skilled labor force is embodied in the mismatch between the provinces and the provinces.2001 years after the mismatch. The mismatch of the high technology labor force in the province, the mismatch between the provinces and the provinces, the high technology labor in the.1996-2004 year, the high technical labor force is in the state-owned and non state. There is a significant increase in the efficiency of the allocation between units. There is no obvious change in the allocation efficiency after 2005. The efficiency of the allocation of high technology labor force between the provinces has declined slightly in.1996-2001 years, but the allocation efficiency is gradually improved after 2002. The reform of state-owned enterprises and the opening to the outside world are the efficiency of the allocation of human resources between state-owned and non-state-owned units. In order to improve the efficiency of human resources allocation, we should gradually eliminate the entry barrier caused by administrative monopoly and improve the production of state-owned enterprises through market-oriented reform to improve the efficiency of human resources allocation. Efficiency, promoting the market-oriented reform of the financial system to solve the financing constraints of private enterprises, from the policy of pursuing the balance of regional economy to the policy of pursuing the equilibrium of regional per capita income, the abolition of the household registration policy, and the adoption of the official performance assessment standard which can more fully reflect the quality of the economic and social development to break the local protectionism And market segmentation.
【学位授予单位】:华东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F249.21
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 申明浩;刘文胜;;服务业开放对制造业资源错配效应研究——基于工业企业数据库的实证分析[J];国际贸易问题;2016年11期
2 余静文;;汇率变动与资源错配——基于中国工业行业数据的分析[J];国际贸易问题;2016年10期
3 王熙麟;;人口流动和中国各地区经济增长收敛[J];宁夏师范学院学报;2016年05期
4 王磊;王康;;地区特征与中国地区间相对价格水平收敛性[J];山西财经大学学报;2016年08期
5 季书涵;朱英明;张鑫;;产业集聚对资源错配的改善效果研究[J];中国工业经济;2016年06期
6 陆铭;;教育、城市与大国发展——中国跨越中等收入陷阱的区域战略[J];学术月刊;2016年01期
7 王宋涛;温思美;朱腾腾;;市场分割、资源错配与劳动收入份额[J];经济评论;2016年01期
8 刘扬;梁峰;;不同类型单位工资的显式与潜在差距[J];数量经济技术经济研究;2015年08期
9 王文;孙早;牛泽东;;资源配置与中国非农部门全要素生产率——基于制造业和服务业之间资源错配的分析[J];经济理论与经济管理;2015年07期
10 盖庆恩;朱喜;程名望;史清华;;要素市场扭曲、垄断势力与全要素生产率[J];经济研究;2015年05期
,本文编号:1973413
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/renliziyuanguanlilunwen/1973413.html