团体保险绩效管理指标体系研究
[Abstract]:Since China's reform and opening up, the living standards of the people have improved significantly. At the same time, the political, economic, financial and other reforms of the country have developed forward, and the people's acceptance of insurance has further strengthened. The most important thing is to constantly change the structure of products and enhance the level of service awareness, so as to improve the working skills and methods of life insurance employees. Based on the practice of group insurance business in China's insurance industry, this paper finds out and analyzes the problems existing in the assessment of group insurance business in order to find an effective assessment method more in line with the development of group insurance business. The first part summarizes the current situation of the performance management of life insurance through the study of relevant literatures at home and abroad. It points out that the emphasis of the performance management in the developed countries in Europe and America is to evaluate the employee's qualifications and personal behavior. The performance management follows the principle of taking the individual as the center and provides the employee for the enterprise. Japanese enterprises pay more attention to team spirit and team strength. There are four main problems in the domestic research on performance management: first, how to combine the performance management of foreign frontiers with the reality of the organization; second, lack of deep understanding of key performance indicators and insufficient in the formulation of indicators. Flexible; third, how to ensure the authenticity of subjective evaluation in the process of performance management, and how to deal with the contradictions between different subjects; fourth, the use of the final results of performance evaluation on the positive role of enterprises, how to further combine the theory and practice of performance management to promote the level of enterprise management The second part mainly elaborates the related theory foundation of performance and performance management, and introduces five kinds of common performance appraisal methods: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). DEA data analysis method, grey relational method, balanced scorecard, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and their respective emphasis. This paper mainly introduces the balanced scorecard method selected in the performance management method, expounds the essential characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of the balanced scorecard method and four essential elements: financial indicators, customer indicators, internal business process indicators, learning At the same time, it briefly introduces the concept of group insurance business, the main differences between group insurance and individual insurance, the classification of group insurance business and the basic principle of insurance application. There are four problems in the method: KPI is used as a tool to manage employees, employees are passive to accept the assessment status, participation is obviously not high; performance evaluation indicators after decomposition from top to bottom, become a pure digital indicators, resulting in little relationship between performance management and long-term strategic development of the company; the formulation of indicators is mainly concentrated; In the financial indicators and business indicators, neglected customer relations, corporate processes, and personal growth of employees; the lack of efficient performance process monitoring, although the formulation of relevant workflow and norms, but after the performance goals are broken down into individuals, the actual operation by the individual at will, not in accordance with the process and norms to operate. The main reasons for these four problems are as follows: the participation of the assessor and the assessed in the performance appraisal is too low, and the lack of performance concepts and the backwardness of management programs are also important reasons. At the financial level, customer level, internal process level, learning and growth level, the group insurance performance appraisal index system based on BSC is obtained. The index weight is calculated by AHP, and the comprehensive value of group insurance performance appraisal can be obtained by relying on the index weight and index assignment. On the basis of this, the enterprise objectives are further decomposed to get the departmental level evaluation objectives, and then the departmental level evaluation system can be established. On the basis of the departmental level performance evaluation indicators, the enterprise objectives are further decomposed to get the performance indicators of group insurance business personnel. The fifth part is mainly based on the BSC group insurance performance management practice. Effective implementation of the Balanced Scorecard assessment system requires a good operating atmosphere, while establishing the corresponding system to ensure that the most important thing is to improve the staff's understanding of performance management, recognition of the performance management approach, improve the enthusiasm of staff to complete performance management. First of all, the method involves a wide range of departments to complete this task, but also requires the cooperation of all other departments, not only increased operating costs, but also the communication and cooperation between the various departments is also very difficult; second, because the Balanced Scorecard performance appraisal index is composed of four. Part of the indicators are composed of, at the same time, its assessment objectives are decomposed from the company's strategic objectives. Therefore, once any aspect of the assessment objectives has changed and adjusted, or the company's strategic objectives have changed, the Balanced Scorecard assessment indicators will be adjusted accordingly, thus invisibly increasing the number of owners. Thirdly, salesmen are accustomed to the hero of performance theory, and it may take a long time to rise to share the fate with the company. Therefore, in the process of promoting the balanced scorecard method in an all-round way, we still need to use the company to explore and innovate repeatedly. The last part is the main conclusions and rationalization suggestions. The balanced scorecard performance management method realizes the organic combination of the company's strategic objectives and personal development goals. The designed balanced scorecard indicators are decomposed layer by layer according to the company's strategic objectives to ensure that the performance indicators of departments and employees and the public. From this point of view, the performance management tools used in this study have a positive impact on driving the group insurance business. At present, the balanced scorecard has been used in most foreign enterprises and achieved good results, but in China due to corporate culture, management model and other factors, the Balanced Scorecard performance management. There are many obstacles in the practical application of management methods. After the introduction of the balanced scorecard, problems at all levels are prone to occur. Based on the above background, we should make full use of the feedback function of performance, adhere to the principle of timely feedback and effective guidance, and promote the visualization of process management and control. Learning from the changes in several levels, as well as the changes in the company's strategic objectives, and adjusting the assessment indicators in a timely and reasonable manner, can ensure that the role of the Balanced Scorecard performance management method can be maximized, and promote the healthy and long-term development of enterprises. Therefore, if domestic insurance companies want to use BSC successfully, they must further improve and upgrade their hardware facilities and management system.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:F272.92;F842.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张洪启;;如何拓展吉林省团体保险业务[J];中国保险;2009年12期
2 李洋;;我国团体保险发展存在的问题及对策[J];中国商界(上半月);2010年12期
3 唐世隽;;关于团体保险业务开拓策略的思考[J];企业家天地;2011年10期
4 王菊芬;;换个角度谈团体保险[J];现代经济信息;2013年18期
5 王同朝;团体保险业务中的问题与对策[J];保险研究;2001年03期
6 钱佩华;论寿险市场中团体保险业务的发展[J];保险研究;2001年05期
7 王奕渲;发展团体保险所要解决的几个问题[J];上海保险;2001年08期
8 张晓媛;浅论团体保险的作用及意义[J];陕西省行政学院.陕西省经济管理干部学院学报;2001年01期
9 郭俊;;新疆团体保险市场现状分析及发展探索[J];新疆金融;2006年09期
10 周灿;;浅议我国团体保险发展中的规范问题[J];长沙铁道学院学报(社会科学版);2006年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 王耀文;对团体保险发展历程的思考[N];中国保险报;2007年
2 蔡发元;中国第一本团体保险专著面世[N];中国保险报;2004年
3 李毅 蔡秋杰;团体保险竞争战略及其选择[N];中国保险报;2004年
4 杜鹃;团体保险面临发展契机[N];中国证券报;2008年
5 筱平;《团体保险理论与实务》出版发行[N];金融时报;2004年
6 黄英君 肖莺;改善团险经营环境充分发挥社会功能[N];中国保险报;2005年
7 边卫;团体保险:团购之路“好险”[N];工人日报;2009年
8 王耀文;对团体保险经营模式的重新定位[N];中国保险报;2007年
9 ;招商信诺在京推介全球医疗团体保险[N];中国保险报;2010年
10 记者 傅烨珉;团险为企业风险保障分忧[N];上海金融报;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 蒲剑;A公司成都团体保险市场竞争策略研究[D];电子科技大学;2006年
2 林颖;平安养老险福建分公司团体保险营销策略研究[D];福州大学;2014年
3 刘彩霞;团体保险绩效管理指标体系研究[D];山东大学;2016年
4 覃超丽;我国团体保险发展思路探讨[D];西南财经大学;2008年
5 张金宏;优化我国团体保险税收政策研究[D];西南财经大学;2010年
6 谢集钢;我国团体保险经营的组织结构及其优化研究[D];西南财经大学;2005年
7 林春梅;我国团体保险业务发展问题探讨[D];首都经济贸易大学;2006年
8 汤晓明;新华人寿江苏分公司团体保险业务市场定位研究[D];南京理工大学;2007年
9 高丹;江苏国寿团体保险业务发展战略研究[D];南京大学;2013年
10 黄陶;中国寿险公司团体保险经营中面对的风险及其对策[D];西南财经大学;2009年
,本文编号:2232866
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/renliziyuanguanlilunwen/2232866.html