卫生人力资源研究中“激励”及相关基本概念的变化

发布时间：2018-11-16 14:47

【摘要】：中文激励理论在卫生服务领域的应用过程中,中文激励理论的基本概念与英文原有理论的概念用法有所变化。这些基本概念的变化有其应用方面的适宜性,但也造成了对卫生人力资源管理应用和未来理论发展的困扰。本文使用了理论分析、文献评阅的方法,探讨了英文motivation的多个概念、中文激励理论的历史文本,系统评阅了2000年以来卫生服务领域的中文激励相关文献。结果发现,英文motivation的三种定义分化为激励、动机、积极性三个中文词汇。存在的概念变异是:刺激(incentive)在中文中与"激励"出现混用;"激励"侧重其作为措施和动作的意义,激励过程在研究中被忽视;"工作积极性"被频繁使用却没有作为正式概念被确定下来。激励概念的变异造成了卫生人力资源研究倾向的偏差,也不利于分析卫生政策的人员影响。因此,建议在理论上展开学术讨论厘清"激励"的概念,未来应重视激励过程、动机的研究。
[Abstract]:During the application of Chinese incentive theory in the field of health service, the basic concept of Chinese incentive theory and the conceptual usage of English original theory have changed. The change of these basic concepts has its suitability in application, but it also causes problems to the application of health human resources management and the development of future theories. Using the methods of theoretical analysis and literature review, this paper discusses several concepts of English motivation, the historical text of Chinese incentive theory, and systematically reviews the relevant literature on Chinese incentive in the field of health service since 2000. The results show that the three definitions of English motivation are divided into three Chinese words: motivation, motivation and motivation. The existing conceptual variations are as follows: stimulus (incentive) is mixed with "motivation" in Chinese, "incentive" focuses on its significance as a measure and action, and the motivation process is ignored in the study. Work motivation is frequently used but not defined as a formal concept. The variation of the concept of incentive causes the deviation of the research tendency of health human resources, and it is also unfavorable to the analysis of the impact of health policy. Therefore, it is suggested that academic discussion should be carried out in theory to clarify the concept of "motivation" and that the study of motivation process and motivation should be emphasized in the future.
【作者单位】：复旦大学公共卫生学院卫生部卫生技术评估重点实验室;
【分类号】：R197.1

【参考文献】