大学学术权力的垄断及其治理——以“学术权贵”形成和规约为视角

发布时间：2018-05-06 00:15

本文选题：学术权贵 + 学术权力　；参考：《高教探索》2017年03期

【摘要】：学术权力的运行状况一直是反映大学内部治理结构的核心所在。近年来基于政策驱动、制度约束与体制松绑等"组合拳"作用,我国大学学术权力与行政权力的关系已经由原来冲突与制衡的"显性表现"过渡到交融与联盟的"隐形延伸"。其中,以学术权贵为代表的学术生态情境成为学术权力异化逻辑的集中体现。窥探基于"知识—权力—资本"交织的学术权贵现象,诠释学术圈子江湖化、学术位阶行政化、学术管理市场化、学术资源私利化以及学术风气庸俗化所展现的学术权力寻租本质与垄断趋势,有助于从学术权力配置、优化学术组织形态、建立独立学术评价体系、形成法理规约与学术退出机制以及知识精英本位文化构建等多维度认识及设计治理学术权力"变种"的路径。
[Abstract]:The operation of academic power has always been the core of the internal governance structure of the university. In recent years, the relationship between academic power and administrative power in our country has changed from "explicit expression" of conflict and check and balance to "invisible extension" of blending and alliance, based on the role of "combined boxing" such as policy drive, system restriction and system loosening. Among them, the academic ecological situation represented by academic power has become the concentrated embodiment of the alienation logic of academic power. To probe into the phenomenon of academic power based on the interweaving of knowledge, power and capital, to explain that the academic circle is becoming a quagmire, the academic rank is administrative, and the academic management is market-oriented. The essence of rent-seeking and monopolization of academic power, which is manifested by the self-interest of academic resources and the vulgarization of academic atmosphere, is helpful to the allocation of academic power, the optimization of the form of academic organization, and the establishment of an independent academic evaluation system. Forming the rule of law, the mechanism of academic withdrawal and the construction of knowledge elitist standard culture, etc., and designing the way of governing the "variant" of academic power.
【作者单位】：广西财经学院管理科学与工程学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金课题“完善中国特色现代大学制度研究”(12CGL090) 广西高校优秀中青年骨干教师培养工程项目(GXQG022014051) 广西教育科学“十二五”规划2014年度反腐倡廉建设理论研究专项课题广西财经学院中青年学术带头人培养对象项目广西重点学科“管理科学与工程”建设经费资助项目的成果
【分类号】：G644

【相似文献】