大学生诚信感及其在决策中的特点：来自行为与ERP的证据

发布时间：2018-06-07 19:23

本文选题：情感素质 + 诚信　；参考：《上海师范大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：诚信感是个体因诚信行为和思想而产生的内心体验,诚信感在特定的情境中总会伴随相应的行为表现。对于诚信感的测量需要有效的测量工具,本研究在梳理前人研究的基础上,通过个别访谈和开放式问卷整理诚信感框架形成初步问卷,在对于270名本科生施测后,经项目分析、探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析得到正式问卷,最终形成了三个维度共10个题项的正式问卷,三个维度分别是学业诚信感、人际诚信感和社会诚信感。问卷的克隆巴赫α值为0.871,达到了测量学要求,能够作为反映大学生诚信感的有效工具。在问卷的基础上,进一步筛选高低诚信感被试进行行为实验,以研究不同诚信感被试在诚信决策中的特点,实验采用了信号博弈范式创设利益冲突情境。以60名本科生作为被试,进行2×2×2混合实验设计,其中诚信感高低为组间变量,自我收益高低和他人收益高低为组内变量,因变量为被试在各个自变量水平下的诚信率和被试的情绪反应。结果发现诚信感与自己收益的交互作用显著,自己收益与他人收益交互显著,反应时差异均不显著,情绪反应差异也不显著。在实验二中,考察了大学生诚信感在不同收益框架下脑电的表现特点,招募了15名大学生为被试,通过信号博弈范式,诱发被试诚信行为和不诚信行为。结果显示,N2受到情绪体验的影响,情绪唤醒度越低,P300波幅越小,诚信感体验越低,P300波幅越小。被试做出诚信后的LPP波增强,情感体验显著高于未做出诚信行为组。
[Abstract]:The sense of honesty is the inner experience of the individual because of the behavior and thought of good faith, and it is always accompanied by the corresponding behavior in the specific situation. The measurement of honesty needs effective measurement tools. Based on the previous studies, this study forms a preliminary questionnaire through individual interviews and open questionnaires. After 270 undergraduate students are tested, the research is analyzed by the project. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis obtained formal questionnaire, and finally formed three dimensions of 10 formal questionnaires, three dimensions are academic integrity, interpersonal integrity and social integrity. The Kronbach 伪 value of the questionnaire is 0.871, which meets the requirements of measurement and can be used as an effective tool to reflect college students' sense of honesty. On the basis of the questionnaire, the behavior experiment of the subjects with high or low sense of honesty is further selected to study the characteristics of the participants with different sense of honesty in the decision-making of honesty. The experiment adopts the signaling game paradigm to create conflict of interest situations. A 2 脳 2 脳 2 mixed experimental design was conducted with 60 undergraduates as subjects, in which the level of honesty was an inter-group variable, and the level of self-benefit and others' income were intra-group variables. The dependent variable is the honesty rate and the emotional reaction of the subjects at each independent variable level. The results showed that the interaction between honesty and self-income was significant, the interaction between self-benefit and others was significant, the difference of reaction time was not significant, and the difference of emotional reaction was not significant. In experiment 2, the characteristics of EEG in different income frame of college students' credit sense were investigated. Fifteen college students were recruited as subjects, and the behaviors of honesty and dishonesty were induced by signal game paradigm. The results showed that the lower the emotional arousal, the smaller the amplitude of P300, the lower the experience of honesty, the smaller the amplitude of P300. The LPP wave increased significantly after the subjects made honesty, and the emotional experience was significantly higher than that of the unfaithful behavior group.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G641

【相似文献】