“U-Multirank”评价体系研究

发布时间：2018-06-19 12:21

本文选题：多元化 + 大学评价　；参考：《河北师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：大学排名自问世以来,其实施评价所形成的单一化导向危及高等教育的多元化发展,成为众多人士忧虑的所在。“U-Multirank”作为一种体现多元化精神的、新的大学排名、评价工具被开发和运用,它的发展实践也成为其他国家和地区在相应领域进行分析和借鉴的基础。在大学评价成为高教界极为重视的研究课题的情况下,对“U-Multirank”体系进行深入的研究是极为必要的,其作为大学评价、排名的一个代表,在体系的形成和发展方面会给相关领域的研究者和实践者们以有益的启发。于是,本文以“U-Multirank”评价体系为研究对象,多元化为视阈,以历史研究法、文献分析法、比较研究法等对评价体系所包含的各个部分、多个层面进行深刻的解读与具体的分析,构成研究内容:第一部分回顾大学排名的历史并进行总结批判,概览欧洲高等教育的历史并说明发展现状,二者结合指向多元化排名、评价的缺失,引出“U-Multirank”的由来,明晰其多元化评价的源流。第二部分在整体层面上挖掘“U-Multirank”的理论根基,在具体层面上解析“U-Multirank”的理念,其所运用的理论、奉行的理念都体现了多元、多样的本质特点,是“U-Multirank”多元化评价在理念端的表现。第三部分从微观层面的排名过程进行、中观层面的个性化排名定制以及宏观层面的排名体系发展来研究“U-Multirank”的实践,在每个实践层面的具体内容上都体现了多元化、系统性的特点,是“U-Multirank”多元化评价在实践端的表现。第四部分在多元化思想指导下对“U-Multirank”体系进行审视,明确其得失,即其在推动多元化评价过程中的经验与实施多元评价中的不足。进而,得出思想层面、制度层面的基本启示,作为对“U-Multirank”多元化评价的思考。
[Abstract]:Since its inception, the single orientation of university rankings has endangered the diversity of higher education and has become a source of concern for many. "U-multirank" is a new university ranking that embodies the spirit of diversity. The evaluation tool has been developed and applied, and its development practice has become the basis for other countries and regions to analyze and use for reference in the corresponding fields. With university evaluation becoming a research topic of great importance to the higher education community, it is essential to conduct an in-depth study of the "U-multirank" system, as a representative of the ranking of university evaluations, In the formation and development of the system will be relevant to the field of researchers and practitioners with useful inspiration. Therefore, this paper takes the "U-Multirank" evaluation system as the research object, the diversification as the visual threshold, the historical research method, the literature analysis method, the comparative research method and so on, carries on the profound interpretation and the concrete analysis to the appraisal system each part, many aspects. The first part reviews the history of university ranking and summarizes and criticizes the history of higher education in Europe and explains the current development of higher education. The combination of the two points to the diversity ranking and the lack of evaluation, leading to the origin of "U-multirank". Clarify the source of its diversified evaluation. The second part excavates the theoretical foundation of "U-multirank" at the overall level, and analyzes the concept of "U-multirank" at the concrete level. It is the expression of U-multirank diversity evaluation at the end of the idea. The third part studies the practice of "U-Multirank" from the view of micro-level ranking process, meso-level personalized ranking customization and macro-level ranking system development. The systematic feature is the performance of U-multirank diversity evaluation in practice. In the fourth part, the U-Multirank system is examined under the guidance of diversification thought, and its gain and loss are determined, that is, its experience in the process of promoting diversification evaluation and its shortcomings in the implementation of pluralistic evaluation. Then, the author draws the basic enlightenment from the ideological and institutional aspects as a reflection on the pluralistic evaluation of U-multirank.
【学位授予单位】：河北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G640

【相似文献】