台湾基础教育课程改革策略及其成效之研究

发布时间：2018-05-14 00:10

本文选题：基础教育 + 课程改革　；参考：《教育学报》2009年05期

【摘要】：台湾的基础教育课程改革又称之为九年一贯课程改革,自1997年启动迄今,若问其成败,大致可曰"改革尚未成功,盘整仍须努力";若论其成效与展望,则大致可曰"病急乱投,矫枉过正,错误在所难免;对症下药,提纲挈领,细调应可回春"。课改过程及其成效所涉因素与配套,千头万绪,颇为繁杂,无法一一丝缕细说,爰仅能就其荦荦大者,诸如改革的背景脉络、改革理想与现实、执行战略与战术、教科书编审选用、职前师培素质与教师在职专业增能等议题,略就研究者于改革实施以来参与行动实践与研究之经验、省思与心得。总结而言,台湾课改政策之执行,先前由于一纲模糊而致治丝益棼,今课改成效回春之方剂或在于,参照并调整"板桥课程发展模式",委由专责单位将课程纲要予以具体化、明确化、阶层化与系统化,冀其赖以纲举目张,而竟臻"巩固基础教育工程,开创富而好礼新局"之理想。
[Abstract]:The basic education curriculum reform in Taiwan is also called the nine-year consistent curriculum reform. Since its inception in 1997, if we ask about its success or failure, it can be said that "if the reform has not yet succeeded, consolidation still has to work hard." Overcorrection, mistakes are inevitable; the right medicine, outline, fine tune should be able to return to spring. " The process of curriculum reform and the factors involved in its effects and their supporting sets are so complicated that they cannot be explained in detail, so that they can only carry out strategies and tactics in terms of their major aspects, such as the context of reform, the ideal and reality of reform, and the implementation of strategies and tactics. On the topics of textbook editor selection, pre-service teacher training quality and teachers' on-the-job professional empowerment, this paper gives some thoughts and experiences on the experience of researchers' participation in action practice and research since the implementation of the reform. To sum up, the implementation of Taiwan's curriculum reform policy, which was previously caused by a vague program, may be the prescription for reviving the effectiveness of the current curriculum reform. Referring to and adjusting the "Banqiao Curriculum Development Model," the specific unit responsible for the implementation of the curriculum outline may specify the curriculum outline. Clarity, stratification and systematization, in order to rely on a programmatic, and actually to "consolidate the basic education project, create a rich and courteous new bureau" ideal.
【作者单位】：台中教育大学教育学系;
【分类号】：G423

【相似文献】