基于ECD模型的小学四年级学生科学素养评估研究
发布时间：2018-09-04 15:04
【摘要】：科学素养已成为现代人必备的素养之一,从提出以来,其内涵不断丰富,现已成为国际上众所周知的热门话题、教育口号。而科学素养本身范围的丰富性和内容的复杂性,又决定了对其评估的多样性和困难性。对小学四年级学生科学素养评估进行研究,有助于我国小学科学素养评估尽快规范化、规模化。本研究选择美国教育评估系统的ECD模型进行评估设计和实施,前期的领域分析和领域建模层对我国小学科学课程标准、NAEP和TIMSS科学素养评估进行分析和总结；中期的概念评估框架层以苏教版小学科学课程内容为主,建立学生模式,以2000年、2005年、2009年NAEP公开的四年级科学评估试题和2003年、2007年、2011年TIMSS公开的四年级科学评估试题为材料,建立证据模式、任务模式,再结合现状确定组合模式、呈现模式和交付系统模式；后期的评估预实验和评估交付层,以四进程交付结构进行评估交付,最后依据数据处理中心的数据对本次评估进行分析。分析评估结果,发现不同班级学生在生命科学领域、物质科学领域、地球和空间科学领域的表现是不同的,学生的科学素养得分非常高的人数依然太少,大多数处于中等水平；在科学认知维度,学生在知道和应用层次的表现较好,在推理层次的表现稍逊。建议以后对学生的科学素养评估能系统化进行,对我国小学生科学素养进行横向和纵向研究。
[Abstract]:Scientific literacy has become one of the essential qualities of modern people. Since it was put forward, its connotation has been enriched, and it has become a popular topic in the world, the slogan of education. The richness of scientific literacy itself and the complexity of its content determine the diversity and difficulty of its evaluation. The research on the scientific literacy evaluation of the fourth grade students in primary school is helpful to standardize and scale the scientific literacy assessment of primary schools in our country as soon as possible. In this study, the ECD model of American Education Evaluation system is selected for evaluation design and implementation, and the previous domain analysis and domain modeling layer are used to analyze and summarize the assessment of scientific literacy of China's primary school science curriculum standard (NAEP and TIMSS). In the middle stage of the conceptual evaluation framework, the primary school science curriculum content is the main content, and the student model is established. The fourth grade science assessment questions published by NAEP in 2000, 2005 and 2009, and the fourth grade science assessment questions published in 2003, 2007 and 2011 by TIMSS, are used as materials. Establish the evidence model, task model, combine the status quo to determine the combination model, presentation model and delivery system model; the later evaluation pre-experiment and evaluation delivery layer, with four-process delivery structure for evaluation delivery, Finally, the evaluation is analyzed according to the data of the data processing center. Analysis and evaluation results show that students in different classes in the field of life science, physical science, earth and space science are different, the number of students with very high scores of scientific literacy is still too small, most of them are at the medium level; In the dimension of scientific cognition, the students' performance in the level of knowledge and application is better than that in the level of reasoning. It is suggested that the evaluation of students' scientific literacy should be systematized, and the horizontal and vertical research on the scientific literacy of primary school students in China should be carried out.
【学位授予单位】：东南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G623.6
本文编号：2222521
[Abstract]:Scientific literacy has become one of the essential qualities of modern people. Since it was put forward, its connotation has been enriched, and it has become a popular topic in the world, the slogan of education. The richness of scientific literacy itself and the complexity of its content determine the diversity and difficulty of its evaluation. The research on the scientific literacy evaluation of the fourth grade students in primary school is helpful to standardize and scale the scientific literacy assessment of primary schools in our country as soon as possible. In this study, the ECD model of American Education Evaluation system is selected for evaluation design and implementation, and the previous domain analysis and domain modeling layer are used to analyze and summarize the assessment of scientific literacy of China's primary school science curriculum standard (NAEP and TIMSS). In the middle stage of the conceptual evaluation framework, the primary school science curriculum content is the main content, and the student model is established. The fourth grade science assessment questions published by NAEP in 2000, 2005 and 2009, and the fourth grade science assessment questions published in 2003, 2007 and 2011 by TIMSS, are used as materials. Establish the evidence model, task model, combine the status quo to determine the combination model, presentation model and delivery system model; the later evaluation pre-experiment and evaluation delivery layer, with four-process delivery structure for evaluation delivery, Finally, the evaluation is analyzed according to the data of the data processing center. Analysis and evaluation results show that students in different classes in the field of life science, physical science, earth and space science are different, the number of students with very high scores of scientific literacy is still too small, most of them are at the medium level; In the dimension of scientific cognition, the students' performance in the level of knowledge and application is better than that in the level of reasoning. It is suggested that the evaluation of students' scientific literacy should be systematized, and the horizontal and vertical research on the scientific literacy of primary school students in China should be carried out.
【学位授予单位】：东南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G623.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 夏小俊;顾乃景;柏毅;;TIMSS 2015与NAEP 2015科学评估框架的比较研究[J];考试研究;2016年01期
2 冯翠典;;“以证据为中心”的教育评价设计模式简介[J];上海教育科研;2012年08期
3 任定成;郑丹;;美国公民科学技术素质标准的设立和演变[J];贵州社会科学;2010年01期
4 乔辉;;基于证据的考试设计理念(ECD)介绍[J];中国考试(研究版);2007年12期
5 李士;“2061计划”和科学素养基准[J];民主与科学;2004年03期
6 魏冰;“科学素养”探析[J];比较教育研究;2000年S1期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 解萌;不同学段小学生科学探究特点研究[D];首都师范大学;2014年
2 陈庆;国际学生评价项目PISA-科学素养测评的研究[D];浙江师范大学;2013年
3 梁润婵;TIMSS、PISA、NAEP科学测试框架与测试题目的比较研究[D];广西师范大学;2009年
，本文编号：2222521
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/xiaoxuejiaoyu/2222521.html
