论中国比较教育的重生——基于学科制度结构的视角

发布时间：2018-03-20 08:04

本文选题：比较教育　切入点：比较教育的衰微　出处：《比较教育研究》2015年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目前,比较教育学者对比较教育的信心发生了根本性的动摇,学科自信变得不堪一击,学科优越感渐趋丧失,学科的可持续发展也正在瓦解。中国比较教育衰微的迹象主要体现在三个方面:就内部而言,比较教育的身份认同正在解构;就外部而言,比较教育的社会需求渐趋丧失;就世界范围而言,比较教育的式微之势难以避免。从学科制度结构看,中国比较教育衰微的缘由主要存在五个方面,即学科边界模糊不清;缺乏扎实可靠的方法论;缺乏稳定卓越的专业化研究队伍;研究成果"泡沫化"繁荣;缺乏规范化的学术培养与培训计划。中国比较教育要获得重生,就需要进行新的选择,即比较教育需"有所为,有所不为",而非"无所不包";比较教育研究需进一步确立方法论,而非"流于形式";比较教育需强化学科的专业化,避免"可替代性";比较教育应注重学科知识谱系,而非"一味讲求服务";比较教育需加强学术培养与培训计划的规范性,避免"丧失竞争力"。
[Abstract]:At present, the confidence of comparative education scholars in comparative education has been fundamentally shaken, subject self-confidence has become fragile, and the sense of discipline superiority is gradually losing. The signs of the decline of comparative education in China are mainly reflected in three aspects: internally, the identity of comparative education is being deconstructed, and externally, the social demand for comparative education is gradually losing; As far as the world is concerned, the decline of comparative education cannot be avoided. From the perspective of subject system structure, there are five main reasons for the decline of comparative education in China, namely, the ambiguity of subject boundaries, the lack of solid and reliable methodology, and the lack of a solid and reliable methodology. There is a lack of a stable and outstanding professional research team; a "bubbling" prosperity of research results; and a lack of standardized academic training and training programs. If comparative education in China is to be reborn, it needs a new choice, that is, comparative education needs "something to do." It is necessary for comparative education to further establish its methodology rather than for "mere formality"; for comparative education to strengthen the specialization of disciplines and to avoid "substitutability"; and for comparative education to focus on the pedigree of knowledge in subjects. Comparative education should strengthen the standardization of academic training and training plan and avoid losing competitiveness.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学国际与比较教育研究院;陕西师范大学教育学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点课题“教育国际化政策及其实施效果的国际比较研究”(项目编号:ADA130006)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：G40-059.3

【参考文献】