研究人员视角的教育资源网上公开障碍研究——以课件资源为例

发布时间：2018-05-23 20:17

本文选题：课件资源 + 开放课件　；参考：《图书情报工作》2015年02期

【摘要】：[目的/意义]教育资源的网上公开,有助于促进知识的广泛传播与成果的开放共享。以教育资源中的课件资源为研究内容,分析我国研究人员对课件资源网上公开会遭受商业目的使用、知识产权侵害、学术优势地位丧失、学生学习行为影响、学风争议危险等障碍的认知情况。[方法/过程]采取问卷调查方法,向全国32个省市发放1 600份问卷;采取访谈法,对武汉大学12名教师进行了逐一访谈。[结果/结论]研究发现,我国研究人员最担忧将课件上网会导致"被他人不正当使用"、"被用于商业目的"、"损害内容完整性",其次为"内容不便公开"、"影响学生学习行为"、"丧失学术优势地位"、"引起学风争议",最不担忧"如何将课件上网";研究人员的年龄、性别、职称、身份与其对课件上网的障碍认知有一定关联。为消除不同研究人员的担忧与顾虑,促进网络学术信息资源的自由流通,建议以平衡公共利益为目的合理保护课件著作权,加强学术道德规范建设,建立权威的课件发布和学术交流平台,并在考核激励机制上给予保障。
[Abstract]:The online disclosure of educational resources contributes to the wide dissemination of knowledge and open sharing of results. Taking the courseware resources of educational resources as the research content, this paper analyzes that Chinese researchers will suffer from commercial purposes, intellectual property infringement, loss of academic superiority, and the influence of students' learning behavior on the online publication of courseware resources. Cognitive status of obstacles such as academic style controversy, danger and so on. [methods] A questionnaire survey was conducted to distribute 1,600 questionnaires to 32 provinces and cities in China, and 12 teachers of Wuhan University were interviewed one by one. [results / conclusions] the study found that Chinese researchers are most worried that using the courseware on the Internet will lead to "improper use by others", "being used for commercial purposes", "impairing the integrity of the content", followed by "inconvenient disclosure of the content", "affecting students' learning behavior" and "losing academic superiority." The last thing to worry about is "how to get the courseware online"; the age of the researchers, Gender, professional title and identity are related to the obstacle cognition of courseware. In order to eliminate the worries and concerns of different researchers and to promote the free circulation of network academic information resources, it is suggested that the copyright of courseware should be reasonably protected in order to balance the public interests, and the construction of academic moral standards should be strengthened. Establish authoritative courseware publishing and academic exchange platform, and provide guarantee in examination and incentive mechanism.
【作者单位】：武汉大学信息管理学院;
【基金】：中国科学协会课题项目“信息化环境下的学术交流研究”(课题编号:2009SXJLKT02)研究成果之一
【分类号】：G434

【相似文献】