教学知识的检验及其认识论困境
发布时间:2018-09-04 17:04
【摘要】:教学知识可大致划分为事实性教学知识、规范性教学知识、体系化教学知识与操作性教学知识。每类知识各具特点,其检验方式各不相同。事实性教学知识的检验方式是真理符合论,规范性教学知识的检验方式是基础主义,体系化教学知识的检验方式是融贯论,操作性教学知识的检验方式是实践论。每一种知识检验与证实方式既有其合理性与积极意义,也存在内在困境。教学知识的检验及其认识论困境的分析,有助于增强教学认识的自觉性,克服过度的知识自信与狂妄,促进教学知识的健康发展。
[Abstract]:Teaching knowledge can be divided into factual teaching knowledge, normative teaching knowledge, systematic teaching knowledge and operational teaching knowledge. Each type of knowledge has its own characteristics and its inspection methods are different. The test mode of factual teaching knowledge is truth conformity theory, the test mode of normative teaching knowledge is foundationalism, the test mode of systematized teaching knowledge is integration theory, and the test mode of operational teaching knowledge is practice theory. Each way of testing and verifying knowledge has its rationality and positive significance, but also has its inherent predicament. The examination of teaching knowledge and the analysis of epistemological dilemma will help to strengthen the consciousness of teaching knowledge, overcome the excessive self-confidence and arrogance of knowledge, and promote the healthy development of teaching knowledge.
【作者单位】: 扬州大学基础教育研究所;
【分类号】:G420
[Abstract]:Teaching knowledge can be divided into factual teaching knowledge, normative teaching knowledge, systematic teaching knowledge and operational teaching knowledge. Each type of knowledge has its own characteristics and its inspection methods are different. The test mode of factual teaching knowledge is truth conformity theory, the test mode of normative teaching knowledge is foundationalism, the test mode of systematized teaching knowledge is integration theory, and the test mode of operational teaching knowledge is practice theory. Each way of testing and verifying knowledge has its rationality and positive significance, but also has its inherent predicament. The examination of teaching knowledge and the analysis of epistemological dilemma will help to strengthen the consciousness of teaching knowledge, overcome the excessive self-confidence and arrogance of knowledge, and promote the healthy development of teaching knowledge.
【作者单位】: 扬州大学基础教育研究所;
【分类号】:G420
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 毛建儒;;对实践标准唯一性的思考[J];理论探索;2007年01期
2 王鉴;姜振军;;论现代教学论的发展基础[J];西北师大学报(社会科学版);2013年06期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈向明;;范式探索:实践—反思的教育质性研究[J];北京大学教育评论;2010年04期
2 熊伟;;建立面向与通往“智慧”的普通图书馆学科体系[J];图书与情报;2012年01期
3 李子运;;论教育技术学的知识形态[J];电化教育研究;2011年06期
4 王晓;;论法哲学视野中的证明对象[J];法律方法与法律思维;2008年00期
5 侯学勇;;融贯性的概念分析:与一致性相比较[J];法律方法;2009年02期
6 王晓;;走出困境:法律论证的认识论再思考[J];法商研究;2007年06期
7 贾玉慧;;法哲学视域下的知识产权[J];法制与社会;2009年30期
8 赵万里;李路彬;;日常知识与生活世界——知识社会学的现象学传统评析[J];广东社会科学;2011年03期
9 姜红;;《金色笔记》中《自由女性》与笔记之间的对话与认知[J];外国文学;2009年06期
10 王安全;;教师自我知识身份误解的生成与消解[J];国家教育行政学院学报;2011年03期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 王晓;王s,
本文编号:2222804
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/xuekejiaoyulunwen/2222804.html