湖南省4所高校贫困生16PF人格特征分析
发布时间：2018-11-27 09:10
【摘要】：目的研究高校贫困生的人格特征,为对其心理援助提供依据。方法采用卡特尔16PF人格问卷,按照分层(年级*专业)随机抽样的原则,对高校1836名在校贫困生进行群体心理测评,有效测试1635人。结果与全国常模比较,除忧虑性人格因素外(M女=12.4812.35,P0.05),男女贫困生在15种主要人格因素上得分均显著低于全国常模;在8项次元人格因素上,男女贫困生均在适应与焦虑型(M=6.87,6.785.40,P0.01)、感情用事与安详机警型(M=5.87,5.645.51,P0.05)2个人格因素上得分显著高于全国常模。贫困生与非贫困生在"有恒性"(t=-3.453,P0.05)、"敏感性"(t=3.958,P0.01)、"怀疑性"(t=2.404,P0.05)、"幻想性"(t=3.115,P0.05)4个主要人格因素以及"感情用事与安详机警型"(t=-3.466,P0.05)、"专业有成就者的个性因素"(t=-2.658,P0.05)、"在新的环境中有成长能力的个性因素"(t=-3.705,P0.01)3个次元人格因素上差异有统计学意义。贫困生一方面在"专业有成就者的个性因素"、"创造能力"、"独立性"、"外向性"、"聪慧性"、"敢为性"、"心理健康水平"、"稳定性"等人格特征上得分偏低(Y2≤55;Y3≤77;Q2、X2、B、H、C≤3;Y1≤12),需要改善;另一方面在"怀疑性"、"忧虑性"、"自律性"等人格特征上得分偏高(L、O、Q3≥8),需要调整。贫困大学生中典型的焦虑型(18.8%)、内向型(27.9%)、安详机警型(17.1%)、怯懦型(6.6%)等人格特点者人数多于典型的适应型(3.8%)、外向型(3.3%)、感情用事型(5.3%)、果断型(2.1%)等人格特点;贫困生在不同性别、不同生源地、独生子女与否之间部分人格特征差异有统计学意义。结论贫困大学生人格特征独居特点,且性别、地域差异、家庭环境是重要的影响因素。
[Abstract]:Objective to study the personality characteristics of poor college students and provide basis for psychological assistance. Methods according to the principle of stratified (grade * specialty) random sampling, 1836 poor college students were assessed by Cattell 16PF Personality questionnaire, 1635 of them were tested effectively. Results compared with the national norm, except for worrying personality factors (M female = 12.4812.35), the scores of 15 main personality factors of male and female poor students were significantly lower than that of the national norm. In terms of 8 item personality factors, both male and female poor students were in the type of adaptation and anxiety (M6.87% 6.785.40% P0.01), emotional and alert type (5.875.645.51), and poor students of both sexes were in the type of adaptation and anxiety (M6.87% 6.785.40% P0.01). P0.05) the scores of two personality factors were significantly higher than the national norm. Poor students and non-poor students were found to have "constant" (t _ (3.453), "sensitivity" (t _ (3.958) P _ (0.01), "scepticism" (t _ (2.404) P 0.05), "fantasy" (t _ (3.115), and (P _ (0.01). 4 main personality factors, "emotional and serenity and alert type" (t ~ (-3.466) P 0.05), "Personality factors of professional achievement" (t ~ (-2.658), (P < 0.05), (P < 0.05). "Personality factors with ability to grow up in the new environment" (TX -3.705 / P0.01) had significant differences among the three dimensional personality factors. Poor students, on the one hand, are "personality factors of professional achievement", "creative ability", "independence", "extroversion", "intelligence", "daring", "mental health level", The scores of "stability" and other personality characteristics were low (Y2 鈮，
本文编号：2360177
[Abstract]:Objective to study the personality characteristics of poor college students and provide basis for psychological assistance. Methods according to the principle of stratified (grade * specialty) random sampling, 1836 poor college students were assessed by Cattell 16PF Personality questionnaire, 1635 of them were tested effectively. Results compared with the national norm, except for worrying personality factors (M female = 12.4812.35), the scores of 15 main personality factors of male and female poor students were significantly lower than that of the national norm. In terms of 8 item personality factors, both male and female poor students were in the type of adaptation and anxiety (M6.87% 6.785.40% P0.01), emotional and alert type (5.875.645.51), and poor students of both sexes were in the type of adaptation and anxiety (M6.87% 6.785.40% P0.01). P0.05) the scores of two personality factors were significantly higher than the national norm. Poor students and non-poor students were found to have "constant" (t _ (3.453), "sensitivity" (t _ (3.958) P _ (0.01), "scepticism" (t _ (2.404) P 0.05), "fantasy" (t _ (3.115), and (P _ (0.01). 4 main personality factors, "emotional and serenity and alert type" (t ~ (-3.466) P 0.05), "Personality factors of professional achievement" (t ~ (-2.658), (P < 0.05), (P < 0.05). "Personality factors with ability to grow up in the new environment" (TX -3.705 / P0.01) had significant differences among the three dimensional personality factors. Poor students, on the one hand, are "personality factors of professional achievement", "creative ability", "independence", "extroversion", "intelligence", "daring", "mental health level", The scores of "stability" and other personality characteristics were low (Y2 鈮，
本文编号：2360177
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/xuekejiaoyulunwen/2360177.html
