高校信息化教学质量评价研究
本文关键词:高校信息化教学质量评价研究 出处:《南京师范大学》2011年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着信息技术的不断发展,高校信息化教育也有了长足发展。高校信息化教学是高校信息化教育的重要组成,科学、合理的评价高校信息化教学质量对于引导信息化教育快速、健康、有序发展具有重要意义。但目前我国高校信息化教学质量评价工作尚在探索阶段,没有形成统一的标准。因此,探讨高校信息化教学质量评价是目前我国高校信息化教学研究中的重要课题。 本文从我国高校信息化教学的实际出发,在研究大量相关文献资料和专家访谈的基础上阐释了高校信息化教学质量的内涵,并提取了影响我国高校信息化教学质量的因素,主要包括:教师、学生、教学内容、教学环境等因素。以多元智能理论、形成性评价理论、发展性评价理论、后现代评价理论为基础,并结合信息化教学质量评价的原则,采用文献研究、专家评议相结合的方法,确定了我国高校信息化教学质量评价的指标及权重,包括一级指标4项,二级指标10项,三级指标29项;评价主体包括:教师、学生、教学管理者。本文针对高校信息化教学质量评价的特点,还提出了一些新的评价方法和手段,如教师自我分析量表、教学博客、关键事件法、教学录播系统、校园BBS调查、基于网络教学平台的评价、多媒体设备管理系统、学生电子档案袋等等,并且构建了高校信息化教学质量评价的模型。最终,本文给出了高校信息化教学质量评价的策略,主要包括:加强高校信息化教学质量评价机构的建设力度;明确高校信息化教学质量评价的基本任务和实施原则;关注高校信息化教学过程与其质量评价的融合;实施多元化评价主体和评价标准的全面评价;重视评价信息的收集与规范操作;正确对待高校信息化教学质量评价的结果。 本文还对南京师范大学信息化教学质量评价工作进行了分析研究,发现文中提出的评价手段、方法,评价策略在其实践中能有所体现。本文提出的我国高校信息化教学质量评价模型和评价策略对高校信息化教学评价的理论研究和实践工作都有参考价值和借鉴作用。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of information technology, information education in colleges and universities has made great progress. Information teaching in colleges and universities is an important component of information education in colleges and universities. It is of great significance to evaluate the quality of informatization teaching in colleges and universities reasonably for guiding the rapid, healthy and orderly development of information education. However, at present, the evaluation of the quality of informatization teaching in colleges and universities in our country is still in the exploratory stage. There is no unified standard. Therefore, it is an important subject in the research of informatization teaching in our country to probe into the quality evaluation of informatization teaching in colleges and universities. Starting from the reality of information teaching in colleges and universities in China, this paper explains the connotation of the quality of informatization teaching in colleges and universities on the basis of studying a large number of relevant documents and experts' interviews. And extract the factors that affect the quality of information teaching in colleges and universities in China, including: teachers, students, teaching content, teaching environment and other factors, with the theory of multiple intelligence, formative evaluation theory, developmental evaluation theory. On the basis of post-modern evaluation theory and combining with the principles of information teaching quality evaluation, this paper uses the method of literature research and expert evaluation to determine the index and weight of information teaching quality evaluation in colleges and universities in China. It includes 4 first-level indicators, 10 second-level indicators and 29 third-level indicators. The main body of evaluation includes: teachers, students, teaching administrators. According to the characteristics of the evaluation of the quality of college information teaching, this paper also puts forward some new evaluation methods and means, such as teacher self-analysis scale, teaching blog. Key event method, teaching recording and broadcasting system, campus BBS investigation, evaluation based on network teaching platform, multimedia equipment management system, student electronic portfolio and so on. Finally, this paper puts forward the strategies of evaluating the quality of informatization teaching in colleges and universities, including: strengthening the construction of the evaluation institutions of the quality of informatization teaching in colleges and universities; Make clear the basic task and implementation principle of the quality evaluation of information teaching in colleges and universities; Pay attention to the integration of the process of information teaching and its quality evaluation in colleges and universities; Carrying out comprehensive evaluation of multiple evaluation subjects and evaluation standards; Pay attention to the collection and standard operation of evaluation information; To correctly treat the results of the evaluation of the teaching quality of information technology in colleges and universities. This paper also analyzes and studies the evaluation work of information teaching quality in Nanjing normal University, and finds out the evaluation means and methods proposed in this paper. The evaluation strategy can be reflected in its practice. The evaluation model and evaluation strategy proposed in this paper have reference value for the theoretical research and practical work of informatization teaching evaluation in colleges and universities. With.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:G642.4;G434
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王景英,梁红梅;后现代主义对教育评价研究的启示[J];东北师大学报;2002年05期
2 南国农;教育信息化建设的几个理论和实际问题(下)[J];电化教育研究;2002年12期
3 毛莹;;美国大学教学评价的特点及其启示[J];中国电子教育;2007年01期
4 于长志;扩招后从影响教学质量的相关因素的变化看高等教育教学质量[J];高等农业教育;2002年07期
5 谢丽娟;;试论课堂教学环境的内涵、结构及建设策略[J];当代教育与文化;2009年06期
6 杨晨;远程开放教育形成性考核模式架构探析[J];开放教育研究;2005年S1期
7 陈航宇,陈素红;构建高校教师课堂教学质量评价体系的设想[J];经济与社会发展;2005年06期
8 章小辉;陈再萍;;高校课堂教学质量的有效教学评价体系结构研究[J];现代教育科学;2006年03期
9 周文瑾;信息化教学的教学评价[J];当代教育论坛;2005年20期
10 颜景林,王晓林;网络教学与传统教学的比较和思考[J];教育信息化;2004年05期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 朱泓;高等学校教学质量评估体系的研究[D];大连理工大学;2004年
2 刘继斌;流行病学教学质量评价研究[D];山西医科大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 陈丽;课堂教学环境透视与改进策略研究[D];新疆师范大学;2006年
2 李凤来;信息化教学设计与评价[D];天津大学;2006年
3 韩伟颖;西部地区农村中小学现代远程教育效益评价体系研究[D];西北师范大学;2007年
,本文编号:1377757
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/xueshengguanli/1377757.html