南阳市青少年心理健康状况及影响因素研究

发布时间：2018-02-28 22:04

本文关键词： 青少年心理健康 SCL-90量表菲尔人格量表　出处：《南华大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：目的通过对南阳市青少年心理健康现况及影响因素的调查,描述其现状及特征,并结合当前社会体制转型、社会思潮、生活方式和价值取向等情况,分析青少年问题产生的深层次的原因,探讨青少年心理问题的相关影响因素,为有效解决青少年心理健康问题提供理论依据。方法本研究以南阳市作为研究现场,运用多阶抽样方法选择样本,采用问卷调查法共调查925例。调查内容主要包括:一般情况、SCL-90和菲尔人格量表测试。对SCL-90各因子分均数和人格测试结果采用t检验和单因素方差分析;影响因素采用多元线性回归分析。结果 1.与国内青年常模比较,本次测试的南阳市青少年各因子分除强迫因子和人际关系外,其余因子均分均高于国内青年常模,差别有统计学意义(p0.01)。 2.男性青少年在敌对性、躯体化两个方面的因子均分高于女性青少年(p0.05);不同学历青少年人际关系和抑郁两个因子均分差异有统计学意义(p0.05),两两比较:大学学历青少年人际关系敏感因子均分低于中学和小学学历青少年,大学学历青少年抑郁因子均分低于小学学历,差异有统计学意义(p0.05),但和中学学历青少年比较差异无统计学意义(p0.05);留守青少年在强迫和人际关系两个因子方面的均分高于非留守青少年(p0.05);农村青少年在人际关系方面因子均分高于城市青少年,在偏执方面,城市青少年因子均分高于农村青少年(p0.05);年满18周岁及以上的青少年在躯体化和恐怖两个因子方面的均分高于18周岁以下的青少年(p0.05); 3.六种人格测试类型在单因素方差分析中,强迫因子均分有显著差异,具有统计学意义(p0.05),其他因子均分没有统计学意义(p0.05);两两比较分析中,部分因子:躯体化、强迫、抑郁、焦虑、偏执有显著性差异,有统计学意义(p0.05); 4.经多元线性回归显示:来源地、年龄、学历和人格测试结果四个因素是影响青少年心理健康的因素。结论 1.南阳市青少年的心理健康总体水平比国内正常人群要低。 2.青少年心理健康状况:非留守青少年优于留守青少年;大学学历青少年优于中、小学学历青少年;女性青少年优于男性青少年;年龄18周岁以下的青少年优于年满18周岁及以上的青少年。 3.不同人格类型的青少年的心理健康状况有显著性差异,主要表现在以下因子:躯体化、强迫、抑郁、焦虑、偏执,通过比较分析,人格分值越高的青少年,其心理健康状况相对越差。 4.影响青少年心理健康的因素主要是来源地、年龄、学历和人格测试结果。
[Abstract]:Purpose. By investigating the mental health status and influencing factors of adolescents in Nanyang City, the present situation and characteristics are described, and combined with the current situation of social system transformation, social trend of thought, lifestyle and value orientation, etc. This paper analyzes the deep causes of adolescent problems and probes into the related influencing factors of adolescent psychological problems to provide a theoretical basis for effectively solving adolescent mental health problems. Method. In this study, Nanyang City was used as the research site, and the method of multi-stage sampling was used to select samples. A total of 925 cases were investigated by questionnaire. The main contents of the investigation included: the general situation of SCL-90 and Phil's personality scale. T test and single factor ANOVA were used to test the average scores of SCL-90 factors and the results of personality test. The influencing factors were analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis. Results. 1.Compared with the domestic youth norm, the average scores of every factor in Nanyang were higher than that of the national youth norm except compulsive factor and interpersonal relationship, the difference was statistically significant (p 0.01). 2. Male adolescents are hostile, The average score of somatization in two aspects was higher than that in female adolescents (p 0.05), and there were significant differences in interpersonal relationship and depression between adolescents with different degrees of education (P < 0.05). The score is lower than that of adolescents with secondary and primary school qualifications, The average score of depression factor in college youth was lower than that in primary school. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), but there was no significant difference compared with the middle school education adolescents, the average scores of the two factors of obsessive force and interpersonal relationship were higher than those of the non-left-behind adolescents, and the rural adolescents were in the interpersonal relationship. The average score of factors is higher than that of urban teenagers. In the aspect of paranoid ideation, the average score of urban adolescents is higher than that of rural adolescents, the average score of somatization and phobia of adolescents aged 18 and above is higher than that of adolescents under 18 years of age. 3. In the single factor ANOVA, there were significant differences in the mean scores of obsessive factors (P 0.05), but no significant difference in other factors (P 0.05), some factors were somatization, compulsion, depression, and there were no significant differences among the six personality test types in single factor ANOVA. There was significant difference in anxiety and paranoid ideation (P 0.05). 4. The multiple linear regression showed that the origin, age, educational background and personality test results were the four factors affecting the mental health of adolescents. Conclusion. 1. The overall level of mental health of adolescents in Nanyang is lower than that of normal people in China. 2. Mental health status of adolescents: the non-left-behind adolescents are superior to the left-behind adolescents; the college graduates are superior to the middle and primary school students; the female adolescents are superior to the male adolescents; Adolescents under the age of 18 are superior to those aged 18 and above. 3. There were significant differences in mental health status among adolescents with different personality types, mainly manifested in the following factors: somatization, compulsion, depression, anxiety, paranoid ideation. Their mental health is relatively poor. 4. The main factors influencing adolescent mental health are origin, age, educational background and personality test results.
【学位授予单位】：南华大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：B844.2

【引证文献】