博士生导师制度的比较分析

发布时间：2018-03-23 16:49

本文选题：博士生导师　切入点：资格　出处：《学位与研究生教育》2011年09期

【摘要】：从导师的角色和责任、导师资格、学术指导方式、学术指导的质量保障机制这四个维度对各国的导师制度进行了比较分析。在导师资格方面,西方国家对职称没有硬性要求,主要强调学术能力和指导经验;在指导方式方面,西方国家以指导委员会制度和双导师制为主,传统上奉行单一导师制的国家也在进行改革;同时,西方国家强调从标准制定、导师培训、签订契约等方面保障学术指导的质量。从比较的视角和现实调研结果来看,我国的导师制度迫切需要进一步改革,尤其是需要打破博导职称化的倾向,鼓励副教授担任博导,同时通过建立博士生指导小组制度或双导师制度,使青年教师参与到博士生指导中来。
[Abstract]:In terms of the roles and responsibilities of mentors, the qualifications of mentors, the ways of academic guidance, and the quality assurance mechanism of academic guidance, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the tutors' systems in various countries. In terms of the qualifications of mentors, there is no rigid requirement for titles in western countries. Emphasis is placed on academic competence and guidance experience; in terms of guidance methods, Western countries are dominated by the steering committee system and the two-mentor system, and countries that have traditionally pursued a single mentor system are also undergoing reforms; at the same time, Western countries have emphasized standard-setting, Tutors training, signing contracts and other aspects to ensure the quality of academic guidance. From the perspective of comparison and practical findings, China's mentor system urgently needs to be further reformed, especially the need to break the trend of PhD professional title. Associate professors are encouraged to serve as podcasts, and young teachers are encouraged to participate in doctoral guidance through the establishment of a doctorate steering group system or a double tutor system.
【作者单位】：北京航空航天大学高等教育研究所;北京大学教育学院;
【基金】：北京市教育科学规划2009年度青年专项课题(课题编号:CAD09049) 北京市哲学社会科学“十一五”规划课题(课题编号:10Ab-JY070) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(课题编号:YWF1006047)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：G643

【相似文献】