小区停车服务垄断行为法律规制探讨

发布时间：2018-01-04 23:33

本文关键词：小区停车服务垄断行为法律规制探讨　出处：《广西大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：小区的停车服务存在着自然垄断,这本无可厚非。但有些商家却采取垄断行为、损害小区业主利益。梳理其中原因并完善法律规制手段,有利于推动建设公平公正法治的市场秩序。本文的六个章节按照如下框架来展开:首先界定“小区停车位”等基本概念,并论证停车服务存在着合理的自然垄断;其次分析现实中普遍存在垄断行为的原因;最后尝试提出法律规制的解决方案。引言部分阐述了本文的研究背景、研究意义和创新之处。第二章进行研究概念界定。本文的小区停车位特指小区内那些归开发商所有、并且尚未随主体工程出售的具有独立产权的停车位;本文的“垄断行为”概念外延也大于《反垄断法》中规定的“垄断行为”。第三章分析小区停车位具有公共物品属性,并论证小区停车服务具有自然垄断的性质。第四、第五章分析了相关市场主体的垄断行为及其产生的限制竞争效果。第四章进一步分析房地产商和物业管理企业的垄断行为,其中又以囤积居奇为典型。其具体判断标准包括以明显不公平高价出售、拒绝出租、故意闲置等,但本文认为这种行为还难以适用《反垄断法》。第五章分析了其他一些助长垄断行为的现象,主要包括任意出售停车位、拒绝合理使用防空空间等。第六章针对上述违反公平竞争的行为如何在《反垄断法》之外加以规制的问题,在分析现有法律缺陷的基础上,提出了一系列规制小区停车服务垄断行为的法律措施。
[Abstract]:There is a natural monopoly in parking service in residential areas, which is not to blame. However, some businesses take monopoly behavior, harm the interests of the owners of residential areas, sort out the reasons and improve the means of legal regulation. In order to promote the construction of fair and just market order of the rule of law, the six chapters of this paper are carried out according to the following framework: first, define the basic concepts of "residential parking space". And demonstrates the existence of reasonable natural monopoly in parking service; Secondly, it analyzes the reasons for the widespread monopoly behavior in reality. Finally, I try to put forward the solution of legal regulation. The introduction describes the background of this paper. The second chapter defines the concept of the research. The parking spaces in this paper refer to the parking spaces with independent property rights that are owned by the developers and not sold with the main project. The concept of "monopoly behavior" in this paper is also larger than the "monopoly behavior" stipulated in the Anti-Monopoly Law. Chapter three analyzes that parking spaces in residential areas have the property of public goods. And demonstrates that parking service in residential areas has the nature of natural monopoly. 4th. Chapter 5th analyzes the monopoly behavior of relevant market subjects and the effect of restricting competition. Chapter 4th further analyzes the monopoly behavior of real estate developers and property management enterprises. Among them, hoarding and hoarding is typical. Its specific criteria include selling at an obviously unfair high price, refusing to rent, deliberately idle, and so on. But this article thinks that this kind of behavior is difficult to apply to the anti-monopoly law. 5th chapter analyzes some other phenomena that encourage monopoly behavior, mainly including the random sale of parking spaces. Chapter 6th aims at how to regulate the above violation of fair competition outside the Anti-monopoly Law, on the basis of analyzing the defects of the existing laws. This paper puts forward a series of legal measures to regulate the monopolistic behavior of parking service in residential areas.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】