论商品房预售合同的效力

发布时间：2018-03-20 10:29

本文选题：商品房预售合同　切入点：商品房预售许可证　出处：《法学家》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：未取得预售许可而签订的预售合同效力,涉及《城市房地产管理法》和《城市商品房预售管理办法》关于商品房预售许可证制度的违反及其对关联合同效力的影响问题。就此,需要首先将《合同法》第52条第5项的一般规定与规定许可证要求的具体强制规定结合起来进行思考。在利益考量方面,虽然《城市商品房预售管理办法》第6条第2款保护的利益通常是确保建筑完成以及购买者利益,但这种利益与当事人合同利益相比,并不具有显著优势,且《城市商品房预售管理办法》等规定的制裁措施也足以实现《城市商品房预售管理办法》第6条第2款的规范目的;相反,无效的后果安排反倒与具体规范的目的相违背。因此,对《城市商品房预售管理办法》第6条第2款的违反,并不充分《合同法》第52条第5项一般规定的立法目的,无预售许可而签订的预售合同应当认定有效。《最高人民法院关于审理商品房买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第2条规定的结论,尽管做了一定的缓和,但仍不符合所解释对象的立法目的。
[Abstract]:The validity of a pre-sale contract signed without obtaining a pre-sale license is related to the violation of the permit system for the pre-sale of commercial housing and its impact on the effectiveness of the associated contract in the Urban Real Estate Administration Law and the measures for the Administration of the Pre-sale of Urban Commercial Housing. The general provisions of article 52, paragraph 5, of the contract Law and the specific mandatory provisions establishing licensing requirements need to be considered first. Although the interests protected by Article 6, paragraph 2, of the "measures for the Administration of advance sales of Urban Commercial Housing" are usually to ensure the completion of the building and the interests of the purchaser, this interest does not have a significant advantage over the interests of the parties in the contract, Moreover, the sanctions provided for in the "measures for the Administration of advance sales of Urban Commercial Housing" are sufficient to achieve the normative purpose of Article 6, paragraph 2, of the "measures for the Administration of advance sales of Urban Commercial Housing"; on the contrary, Therefore, the violation of Article 6, paragraph 2, of the "measures for the Administration of advance sales of Urban Commercial Housing" is not sufficient for the legislative purposes of the general provisions of Article 52, item 5, of the contract Law. A pre-sale contract signed without a pre-sale license shall be recognized as valid. The conclusion of Article 2 of the Supreme people's Court on the interpretation of the applicable Law in the trial of disputes over the contract for the purchase and sale of commercial housing, although it has been somewhat mitigated, However, it still does not accord with the legislative purpose of the explained object.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】