当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 房地产论文 >

论预告登记制度

发布时间:2018-04-23 17:45

  本文选题:预告登记制度 + 比较考察 ; 参考:《山东大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:随着市场经济的发展,不动产交易市场变得日趋活跃,特别是以预售商品房为中心的交易市场。但是,房地产行业的不断发展也带来了一系列社会问题,尤其是房地产开发商往往受房价上涨的经济利益驱使,做出违背市场诚实信用原则的“一房二卖”乃至“多卖”等行为,这严重损害了预购人的利益。为了保护预购人的利益以及交易安全,商品房预售合同登记制度得到确立和发展。但是商品房预售合同登记制度并不是我们通常所说的预告登记制度,二者在很多方面存在着差异。随着2007年《物权法》的颁布,预告登记制度在我国得到正式确立,可以说这是我国登记制度上的一大亮点,是我国立法进步的表现。但是由于预告登记制度在我国起步较晚,和域外预告登记制度相比还存在很多不足,也在实践当中遇到了诸多困境。所以,本文希望通过对预告登记制度基本问题的阐述分析和对域外预告登记制度的比较考察,然后立足于我国目前的立法实际,发现我国预告登记制度的不足并提出一些可行性的立法建议。不仅如此,本文对我国预告登记制度的研究分为实体与程序两个方面,避开了重实体轻程序的研究方向,为以后的立法与研究提供了方向。 全文主要包括以下几个部分: 第一章是对预告登记制度的基本概述,主要包括对预告登记概念的定位,起源的历史追溯研究,国内外关于预告登记性质的讨论并且提出了自己的观点,预告登记本身的特性,预告登记与其他登记区别以及预告登记的价值分析。 第二章是对域外预告登记制度的比较考察,主要介绍了德国、日本和我国台湾地区的预告登记制度,包括预告登记的适用范围、效力、启动程序、消灭原因等方面,而且还分析了它们之间的异同点及形成原因。 第三章是对我国预告登记制度的发展现状进行分析并提出了完善建议,其中包括了商品房预售合同登记制度和预告登记制度之间的比较分析以及二者在商品房预售领域的衔接问题,并就二者在商品房预售领域的衔接提出建议;预告登记制度在我国确立前期的地方性立法分析以及预告登记制度的正式确立和发展;从实体与程序两个方面分析了我国预告登记制度存在的不足与缺失,并结合我国的立法实际、借鉴域外的立法经验,从立法体例选择、实体方面、程序方面上对预告登记制度在我国的发展与完善提出相关立法建议。 最后,希望通过本文对预告登记制度的研究,能使得预告登记制度在我国真正发挥出其所应该具有的价值与功能,能够使其切实起到维护不动产的交易安全、保护债权人的利益的作用;同时希望能够对在不久出台的《不动产统一登记条例》中预告登记制度相关条文的设计以及未来预告登记制度在我国的完善起到一定的帮助作用。
[Abstract]:With the development of market economy, the real estate market becomes more and more active, especially the market centered on pre-sale commercial housing. However, the continuous development of the real estate industry has also brought a series of social problems, especially the real estate developers are often driven by the economic benefits of rising house prices. The behavior of "one house, two selling" and even "selling more", which violates the principle of good faith in the market, has seriously damaged the interests of the buyers. In order to protect the interests of the buyers and the transaction security, the registration system of the pre-sale contract of commercial housing has been established and developed. However, the registration system of commercial housing pre-sale contract is not what we usually call the advance notice registration system, and there are differences between them in many aspects. With the promulgation of the Real right Law in 2007, the notice registration system has been formally established in China, which can be said to be a bright spot in the registration system of our country and the manifestation of the legislative progress of our country. However, due to the late start of the notice registration system in our country, compared with the foreign advance registration system, there are still many shortcomings, and also encountered many difficulties in practice. Therefore, this paper hopes to analyze the basic problems of the notice registration system and the comparative investigation of the extraterritorial notice registration system, and then based on the current legislative reality of our country. Find out the deficiency of the advance notice registration system in our country and put forward some feasible legislative suggestions. Moreover, the research on the system of advance notice registration in our country is divided into two aspects: entity and procedure, which avoid the research direction of emphasizing substance and light procedure, and provide the direction for future legislation and research. This paper mainly includes the following parts: The first chapter is the basic overview of the notice registration system, mainly including the positioning of the concept of advance notice registration, the history of the origin of the study, the domestic and foreign discussion on the nature of advance notice registration and put forward their own views, the characteristics of the advance notice registration. The difference between notice registration and other registration and the value analysis of notice registration. The second chapter is a comparative study of the extraterritorial notice registration system. It mainly introduces the advance notice registration system in Germany, Japan and Taiwan, including the scope of application, effectiveness, start-up procedure, elimination reasons and so on. The similarities and differences between them and the reasons for their formation are also analyzed. The third chapter is to analyze the current situation of the advance notice registration system in China and put forward some suggestions to improve it. It includes the comparative analysis between the registration system of the contract of commercial housing pre-sale and the system of advance notice registration, as well as the connection between the two in the field of pre-sale of commercial housing, and puts forward some suggestions on the connection between the two in the field of pre-sale of commercial housing. This paper analyzes the local legislation and the formal establishment and development of the advance notice registration system in our country, analyzes the deficiency and deficiency of the notice registration system from the aspects of entity and procedure. Combined with the legislative practice of our country, the author draws lessons from the foreign legislative experience, and puts forward some relevant legislative suggestions on the development and perfection of the advance notice registration system in our country from the aspects of legislative style selection, entity and procedure. Finally, it is hoped that through the study of the system of advance notice registration in this paper, the notice registration system can really play the value and function it should have in our country, and it can effectively maintain the transaction security of real estate. At the same time, it hopes to help the design of the relevant provisions of the notice registration system and the improvement of the future notice registration system in our country.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D923.2


本文编号:1792970

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/fangdichanjingjilunwen/1792970.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0b640***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com