我国房地产上市公司债务融资对公司绩效的影响研究
[Abstract]:The research on the impact of debt financing on corporate performance has gone through many stages. Although the views of different schools are not consistent, they all think that reasonable arrangement of debt financing scale and structure is of great help to the improvement of corporate performance. In recent years, the real estate industry of our country has been developed by leaps and bounds. The real estate industry is a highly capital-intensive industry and also an industry with accumulated risks. Chinese scholars have studied the performance of real estate companies from the perspective of capital structure, and formed a complete research system, but the research on the performance of real estate companies from the perspective of debt financing is still in the primary stage. At present, China's real estate industry has a high ratio of assets and liabilities, and the positive effect of debt financing on the performance of real estate companies will make a great contribution to the development of the real estate industry. Based on the theory of relevant capital structure and the comprehensive research of scholars, this paper analyzes the impact of debt financing on corporate performance from four aspects, namely, financial leverage, incentive and restraint. Creditor intervention governance and bankruptcy threat. In this paper, a research and design scheme is proposed by combining theoretical and empirical methods. 53 listed real estate companies in China are selected as sample data for the three years from 2009 to 2011. The rate of return on net assets is taken as the explanatory variable, the asset-liability ratio, and the short-term debt financing ratio. The long-term debt financing ratio, the commercial credit financing rate, the disposable free cash flow ratio are the explanatory variables, the assets size and the sales income growth rate are the controlling variables, on the basis of the descriptive statistical analysis of each index, Multivariate statistical regression and test are used to analyze the relationship between each explanatory variable and the explained variable. The conclusions of this paper are as follows: first, the asset-liability ratio is negatively correlated with the performance of listed real estate companies, that is, the higher the debt ratio, the more negative the financial leverage is, and the lower the corporate performance. Second, the short-term debt financing rate is negatively correlated with the performance of the listed real estate companies, that is, the short-term debt financing rate is too high, and the real estate listed companies are facing excessive repayment pressure, which has a significant negative impact on corporate performance. Third, the long-term debt financing rate has no significant impact on the performance of listed real estate companies. The listed real estate companies in China should make full use of long-term liabilities and eliminate short-sighted behavior of over-utilizing short-term liabilities. Give full play to the positive effect of long-term liabilities on corporate performance. Fourth, the commercial credit financing rate is positively correlated with the performance of listed real estate companies, that is, high commercial credit financing rate can not only reduce the cost of capital, but also help to improve the corporate credit, which has a significant help to the improvement of corporate performance. Fifth, the ratio of disposable free cash flow is negatively related to the performance of listed real estate companies, which shows that the listed real estate companies in China should strengthen the control of disposable free cash flow and improve the efficiency of capital use in order to improve their performance.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:F275;F299.233.4
【共引文献】
相关会议论文 前10条
1 杨慧辉;;“中小企业板”对改善中小企业资本结构的实证分析[A];中国会计学会高等工科院校分会2005年学术年会暨第十二届年会论文集[C];2005年
2 汤海溶;黄登仕;周嘉南;;是什么改变了上市公司资本结构——来自中国上市公司的证据[A];公司财务研讨会论文集[C];2004年
3 吕鹏娟;;中国零售业赢利能力影响因素的灰色关联分析[A];第19届灰色系统全国会议论文集[C];2010年
4 王鲁平;陈军;聂丽洁;;资本结构影响因素的新证据——来自于上证180和深证100的数据分析[A];中国会计学会2006年学术年会论文集(下册)[C];2006年
5 黎精明;;企业财务能力管理研究述评[A];中国会计学会财务管理专业委员会2009年学术年会论文集[C];2009年
6 杨海燕;孙健;;监督或无为:异质机构投资者对代理成本的影响[A];中国会计学会2011学术年会论文集[C];2011年
7 陈艺萍;张信东;;企业资本结构与公司效率互动关系分析——来自中小板上市公司的证据[A];中国会计学会2011学术年会论文集[C];2011年
8 刘仕煜;王福胜;;再探公司治理及其评价:成本收益视角[A];中国会计学会财务成本分会2011年年会暨第二十四次理论研讨会论文集[C];2011年
9 张卿;贾怀京;;中国移动资本结构影响因素实证研究[A];中国通信学会第五届学术年会论文集[C];2008年
10 顾乃康;陈辉;;股票流动性与公司资本结构[A];第三届(2008)中国管理学年会论文集[C];2008年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 何溪明;房地产周期及其宏观调控政策研究[D];南开大学;2010年
2 江金锁;市场环境、实际控制人控制方式与负债治理效应[D];暨南大学;2011年
3 龙建辉;银行监督与公司治理效率[D];浙江大学;2011年
4 曲春青;管理者过度自信对公司金融决策影响的实证研究[D];东北财经大学;2010年
5 宋淑琴;信贷契约的治理效应研究[D];东北财经大学;2010年
6 叶宏伟;国际市场势力与出口商品结构升级[D];浙江大学;2011年
7 张永;行为公司金融视角下的我国中小企业融资结构研究[D];山东农业大学;2011年
8 李雪峰;多元化经营与公司绩效关系研究[D];华中科技大学;2011年
9 陈晓敏;财务重述公司盈余质量特征及其经济后果研究[D];暨南大学;2011年
10 邓念;政府作用下的中国房地产市场理论与实证研究[D];复旦大学;2010年
,本文编号:2148409
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/fangdichanjingjilunwen/2148409.html