西方逻辑学传入过程中“辨学”与“辩学”概念的演变

发布时间：2018-01-20 19:30

本文关键词： 逻辑学辨学辩学　出处：《清史研究》2015年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在明末清初西方逻辑学首次传入中国的过程中,"辩学"和"辨学"被用于指称演绎逻辑或其部分内容,存在等同关系。逻辑学于晚清再次传入时被正式译作"辨学",意为辨析论说之学。在此之后,"辨学"作为logic的译名被"名学"、"论理学"取代,但这一概念在"西学中源"、"据西释中"的历史背景下开始包含有论辩之意,直至被与指称"中国逻辑"的"辩学"等同起来。"辨学"与"辩学"两概念之所以被等同,既有古代汉语两字通用、清末译名未能统一而以"辨学"翻译logic影响有限的因素,一定程度上也源于推动逻辑学传入和论证中国逻辑乃至中国哲学合法性的需要。
[Abstract]:During the first introduction of western logic to China in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties, "dialectics" and "dialectics" were used to refer to deductive logic or some of its contents. Logic was formally translated as "dialectical study" in the late Qing Dynasty, meaning the theory of differentiation and argumentation. After that, "dialectical study" as the translation name of logic was replaced by "nominology" and "on Neo-Confucianism". However, this concept began to contain argumentation under the historical background of "the source of western learning" and "according to the interpretation of the west". Until it was equated with the argumentation of "Chinese logic", the two concepts of "dialectical study" and "dialectical study" were identical, and there were two common words in ancient Chinese. In the late Qing Dynasty, the factors which did not unify the translated names and limited influence on the translation of logic by "dialectical learning" also came from the need to promote the introduction of logic into China and to demonstrate the legitimacy of Chinese logic and even the legitimacy of Chinese philosophy.
【作者单位】：中国科学院大学人文学院;
【分类号】：B81-09
【正文快照】： 在西方逻辑学传入中国过程中,“辨学”和“辩学”都曾被用作逻辑学的译名。而现今的主要逻辑学和哲学工具书均未专门收录“辨学”词条,并认为指称中国古代逻辑的“辩学”即“辨学”。1尽管“辨”与“辩”确为同源字2,两字通用的记载也见于《说文解字注》(辩“俗多与辨不分”)3

【参考文献】