富人治村的类型与基层民主实践机制研究

发布时间：2018-01-18 10:30

本文关键词：富人治村的类型与基层民主实践机制研究　出处：《中国农村观察》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在社会分化背景下,富人治村的出现具有普遍性与必然性。本文通过对不同类型富人治村状况的分析,探讨了社会分化背景下基层民主制度的实践机制。研究表明,富人治村在实践中呈现出多种样态,根据国家权力在基层配置方式的不同,可以将其划分为资本主导、行政主导、公共规则主导三种类型,三者反映了基层民主制度的不同实践。国家是影响基层民主实践的重要力量,它的良性运行依赖于国家权力的合理配置。对国家的强调,有助于厘清学界对于富人治村的诸多争论,为社会分化背景下探索基层民主的发展路径提供借鉴。随着农村社会不断走向分化与多元化,国家既要通过行政放权给予社会更多自治空间,又要规范和协调各种利益与权力关系,为乡村治理提供良好的制度供给,推进基层民主得到实质性发展。
[Abstract]:Under the background of social differentiation, the emergence of the village of the rich has universality and inevitability. This paper discusses the practical mechanism of grass-roots democratic system under the background of social differentiation. The study shows that the rich people manage villages in various ways in practice, according to the different ways of allocation of state power at the grass-roots level. It can be divided into three types: capital-led, executive-led and public rules-oriented, which reflect the different practices of grass-roots democratic system. The state is an important force to influence grass-roots democratic practice. Its benign operation depends on the rational allocation of state power, and the emphasis on the state helps to clarify the many arguments in academic circles for the rich to govern the village. For the background of social differentiation to explore the development of grass-roots democracy to provide reference. As the rural society continues to be divided and diversified, the country should give more autonomous space to the society through administrative decentralization. It is also necessary to standardize and coordinate the relationship between interests and power, to provide a good institutional supply for rural governance, and to promote the substantive development of grass-roots democracy.
【作者单位】：华中科技大学中国乡村治理研究中心;
【分类号】：D422.6
【正文快照】： 一、问题与进路自1982年《宪法》确定村民委员会为群众性自治组织以来,农村基层民主制度已经运行了30余年。随着市场经济的发展,农民逐渐从原来单一从事农业劳动、收入水平相对平均的群体,分化成为从事多种职业、收入差距不断加大的不同阶层(万能、原新,2009),社会分化已然成

【相似文献】