当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 法治论文 >

区域可持续发展指标体系研究

发布时间:2018-06-21 10:08

  本文选题:可持续发展指标体系 + 功能分区 ; 参考:《重庆大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:随着城市的快速发展和经济的增长,城市区域发展不平衡、空间结构混乱、分区功能定位模糊、资源耗竭、环境污染等城市区域发展问题逐渐突出,城市区域可持续发展面临严峻挑战。2005年,我国提出“主体功能区”的思想,为解决城市发展问题提出了一个新的思路;2013年,重庆市根据区县资源禀赋、发展现状等提出建立五大功能区域的构想,符合科学发展观的要求,有利于城市可持续发展的实现。在五大功能区战略布局下,重庆市区县外部环境和发展要求已经发生了变化,原有的考核区域发展的指标体系已不能满足未来发展的需要。因此,以可持续发展为指导,根据功能区的发展定位和要求,研究功能区可持续发展指标,构建新的功能区考评体系具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。 结合国内外对功能区和可持续发展方面的研究,了解功能区理论基础和可持续发展具体要求,系统总结了功能区可持续发展的内容,即经济可持续、社会可持续、环境可持续和资源可持续。根据重庆市功能区发展定位,,以可持续理念为指导,通过文献搜集、系统分析、专家咨询等方法,按照“四分法”的指标体系模式,初步建立了一个四维(即经济发展、社会和谐、生态环境和资源效用)3级,共48个指标的可持续发展指标体系。 为了使指标体系更契合重庆市功能区实际,在对38区县进行问卷调查的基础上,使用结构方程模型,对经济发展、社会和谐、生态环境和资源效用四个子系统做了验证性因子分析。通过实证分析,探索了子系统内部的因子关系和因子结构,并最终确立了包含32个指标的可持续发展指标体系。其中,经济发展子系统包括经济活力、经济实力和经济发展带动力3个二级指标,9个可测量指标,经济发展带动力与经济实力相关性较大;社会和谐子系统包括生活质量、社会稳定、民主法治和社会发展带动力4个二级指标,9个可测量指标,社会稳定与社会发展带动力相关性较大;生态环境子系统包括生态质量、环境友好和生态保护3个二级指标,9个可测量指标,环境友好与生态保护相关性大;资源效用子系统包括资源承载力和资源集约2个二级指标,5个可测量指标,两个二级指标相关系数高达0.85。 根据确立的指标体系因子结构和因子关系,结合五大功能区发展定位,对具体运用指标体系引导功能区可持续发展提出针对性的建议,提高研究成果的适用性。从经济、社会、环境和资源四个维度构建功能区可持续发展指标体系,鼓励区县根据辖区实际,科学选择发展方向,做到“有所为、有所不为”。同时,指标体系为政府科学决策提供参考依据,为政府进一步差异化考评区县发展奠定基础,有利于统筹区域发展,符合科学发展观的要求,有利于实现重庆市全面建设小康社会的目标。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of city and the growth of economy, the development of urban area is unbalanced, the spatial structure is chaotic, the location of district function is vague, the resource is exhausted, the environment pollution and so on, the problems of urban regional development are becoming more and more prominent. The sustainable development of urban areas is facing severe challenges. In 2005, China put forward the idea of "main function areas", which put forward a new way of thinking to solve the problem of urban development. In 2013, Chongqing put forward a new idea according to the natural resources of districts and counties. The present situation of development puts forward the idea of establishing five functional regions, which conforms to the requirements of the scientific development view and is conducive to the realization of the sustainable development of the city. Under the strategic layout of the five functional areas, the external environment and development requirements of Chongqing districts and counties have changed, and the original index system for assessing regional development can no longer meet the needs of future development. Therefore, under the guidance of sustainable development and according to the development orientation and requirements of functional areas, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the indicators of sustainable development of functional areas and to construct a new evaluation system for functional areas. Combined with the research on functional zones and sustainable development at home and abroad, the theoretical basis and specific requirements of sustainable development of functional zones are understood, and the contents of sustainable development of functional zones are summarized systematically, that is, economic sustainability and social sustainability. Environmental sustainability and resource sustainability. According to the development orientation of Chongqing functional area, guided by the concept of sustainability, through the methods of literature collection, systematic analysis, expert consultation, and in accordance with the index system model of the "four-part method", a four-dimensional (i.e. economic development) was preliminarily established. Social harmony, ecological environment and resource utility are three levels, a total of 48 indicators of sustainable development index system. In order to make the index system more in line with the reality of Chongqing functional area, on the basis of questionnaire survey of 38 districts and counties, the structural equation model is used to promote economic development and social harmony. The four subsystems of ecological environment and resource utility have done confirmatory factor analysis. Through the empirical analysis, this paper explores the internal factor relationship and the factor structure of the subsystem, and finally establishes the sustainable development index system which contains 32 indicators. Among them, the economic development subsystem includes three secondary indexes of economic vitality, economic strength and driving force of economic development, nine measurable indicators, and the relationship between economic development driving force and economic strength is relatively large, and the social harmony subsystem includes quality of life. Social stability, democracy and the rule of law and social development drive four secondary indicators, nine measurable indicators, social stability and social development driving force correlation, ecological environment subsystem including ecological quality, Environmental friendliness and ecological protection include 3 secondary indexes, 9 measurable indexes, and the resource utility subsystem includes 2 secondary indexes of resource carrying capacity and resource concentration, 5 measurable indexes, and the relationship between environmental friendliness and ecological protection is great. The correlation coefficient of two secondary indexes is as high as 0.85. According to the established index system factor structure and factor relationship, combined with the development orientation of the five functional areas, this paper puts forward specific suggestions to guide the sustainable development of the functional areas by using the index system to improve the applicability of the research results. From the four dimensions of economy, society, environment and resources, this paper constructs the index system of sustainable development of functional areas, encourages the districts and counties to choose the direction of development scientifically according to the reality of the district, and to achieve "something to do, something to not do". At the same time, the index system provides the reference basis for the scientific decision of the government, lays the foundation for the government to further differentiate and evaluate the development of districts and counties, is conducive to the overall regional development, and conforms to the requirements of the scientific development view. It is conducive to the realization of Chongqing's goal of building a well-off society in an all-round way.
【学位授予单位】:重庆大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F299.27

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 徐宁;;关于土地利用功能分区研究[J];安徽农业科学;2007年02期

2 方建德;杨扬;熊丽;;国内外城市可持续发展指标体系比较[J];环境科学与管理;2010年08期

3 李晶;城市可持续发展指标体系及评价方法研究——以资源枯竭型城市为例[J];财经问题研究;2005年06期

4 谢高地;鲁春霞;甄霖;曹淑艳;章予舒;冷允法;;区域空间功能分区的目标、进展与方法[J];地理研究;2009年03期

5 王艳;宋振柏;吴佩林;;城市功能分区的空间聚类方法研究及其应用——以济南市为例[J];地域研究与开发;2009年01期

6 李曼;;比较优势理论与竞争优势理论关系探究[J];国际商务研究;2008年06期

7 刘t

本文编号:2048230


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/2048230.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户a6119***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com