中国特色公众协商途径与协商民主实施满意度——基于12省市领导干部的问卷调查

发布时间：2018-07-03 05:09

本文选题：公众协商途径 + 协商民主实施满意度　；参考：《国家行政学院学报》2017年01期

【摘要】：从作为公众参与的协商民主出发,本文考察中国语境下领导干部的协商民主实施满意度在公众协商途径及其实施周期,以及不同职务级别、单位类型和地区之间是否存在显著差异。结果表明:厅局级干部的协商民主实施满意度比科级和县处级干部高;党政部门实施决策听证会、党务会议、收集民意的周期越短,领导干部对协商民主实施越满意,但接待信访群众越频繁满意度越低;人大、政协、法检及群团组织实施决策听证会、接待信访、热线电话、网络问政和群众评议获得的满意度在不同实施周期之间无显著差别;政协领导干部经常收集民意比偶尔收集民意所获得的协商满意度要高;东部地区领导干部的协商民主实施满意度比西部地区高。面向协商民主的可持续发展,特别需要调动基层领导干部运用协商民主的积极性,强化党政机构实施协商民主的主动性,重视公众主动发起而党政机构和领导干部被动卷入的公众协商途径。
[Abstract]:Starting from the deliberative democracy as public participation, this paper examines the satisfaction of leading cadres in the implementation of deliberative democracy in the context of Chinese context in terms of the path of public consultation and its implementation cycle, as well as the different job levels. Whether there is significant difference between unit type and region. The results show that the satisfaction of the cadres at the department and bureau levels in the implementation of consultation and democracy is higher than that in the cadres at the department level and the county level, and the shorter the period for the party and government departments to implement decision-making hearings, the party affairs meeting and the gathering of public opinion, the more satisfied the leading cadres are with the implementation of the consultative democracy. However, the more frequent the people's satisfaction is, the lower the satisfaction of the people's Congress, the CPPCC, the judicial procuratorate and the group groups in the implementation of decision-making hearings, the reception of letters and visits, the hotline, the network polices and the masses' comments have no significant difference between different implementation cycles. The leading cadres of the CPPCC often collect public opinion more than the occasional collection of public opinion, and the eastern leading cadres are more satisfied with the democratic implementation of consultation than in the western region. In view of the sustainable development of consultative democracy, it is especially necessary to mobilize grassroots leading cadres to use the enthusiasm of consultative democracy and to strengthen the initiative of party and government organizations in implementing consultative democracy. Pay attention to the way of public consultation initiated by the public and passively involved in the party and government organizations and leading cadres.
【作者单位】：四川大学;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“健全社会主义协商民主制度研究”(13!ZZ033);国家社科基金青年项目“群体性事件政策议程学发生机制与治理研究”(14CGL038) 中国博士后第九批特别资助(2016T90866) 四川大学青年学术人才项目(SKQX201306)
【分类号】：D621

【参考文献】