英汉原因连词原型特征演变的对比研究

发布时间:2021-03-25 21:50
  因果复句是语法结构的重要组成部分。在因果复句的研究中,对因果连词的研究尤其重要。然而,以往学者对因果连词的研究大多是共时研究,历时研究很少。本研究选择英汉原因连词作为研究对象,主要解决以下三个问题:(1)英语原因连词的原型特征在语用频率、句法位置和语义强度三个方面经历了什么演变历程?(2)汉语原因连词的原型特征在语用频率、句法位置和语义强度三个方面经历了什么演变历程?(3)英汉原因连词的原型特征演变有何异同?其理据是什么?首先,本研究基于原型理论和采用定量分析的方法找出各时期英汉原因连词原型的语用频率;其次,探究各时期英汉原因连词原型的标记模式和其所连接的因果复句的语序;再次,探究各时期英汉原因连词原型所连接的因果复句的主客观语义;最后,对比英汉原因连词原型特征演变的异同并解释其理据。本研究的主要发现如下:(1)英语原因连词的原型特征演变。首先,英语原因连词的原型演变为for<for<for<because,其语用频率一直保持在65%以上;其次,英语原因连词原型的标记模式一直居中占优势和果-因语序一直为优势语序;最后,英语原因连词原型的主观义频率演变为51.61%、6... 

【文章来源】:湖南师范大学湖南省 211工程院校

【文章页数】:149 页

【学位级别】:硕士

【文章目录】:
Abstract
摘要
Introduction
    0.1 Research Background
    0.2 Research Objectives
    0.3 Research Methodology
    0.4 Research Significance
    0.5 Structure of the Thesis
Chapter One Literature Review
    1.1 Previous Studies of Pragmatic Features of English and ChineseCausal Conjunctions
    1.2 Previous Studies of Syntactic Features of English and ChineseCausal Conjunctions
    1.3 Previous Studies of Semantic Features of English and ChineseCausal Conjunctions
        1.3.1 A Traditional Approach
        1.3.2 A Cognitive Approach
    1.4 Previous Studies of Grammaticalization of English and ChineseCausal Conjunctions
    1.5 Summary
Chapter Two Theoretical Foundations
    2.1 The Development of Prototype Theory
        2.1.1 The Classical Category Theory
        2.1.2 Family Resemblance
        2.1.3 Prototype Theory
    2.2 The Definitions of Prototype
    2.3 The Characteristics of Prototype
    2.4 Main Factors in Prototype Recognition
        2.4.1 Cultural Factor
        2.4.2 Era Factor
        2.4.3 Geographical Factor
        2.4.4 Personal Factor
Chapter Three Evolution of Prototype Features of English CausalConjunctions
    3.1 The Prototype Features of English Causal Conjunctions in Ancient Times
        3.1.1 The Pragmatic Features of English Causal Conjunctions inAncient Times
        3.1.2 The Syntactic Features of English Causal Conjunctions inAncient Times
        3.1.3 The Semantic Features of English Causal Conjunctions inAncient Times
    3.2 The Prototype Features of English Causal Conjunctions in Middle Ancient Times
        3.2.1 The Pragmatic Features of English Causal Conjunctions inMiddle Ancient Times
        3.2.2 The Syntactic Features of English Causal Conjunctions in Middle Ancient Times
        3.2.3 The Semantic Features of English Causal Conjunctions in Middle Ancient Times
    3.3 The Prototype Features of English Causal Conjunctions in Modern Times
        3.3.1 The Pragmatic Features of English Causal Conjunctions inModern Times
        3.3.2 The Syntactic Features of English Causal Conjunctions in Modern Times
        3.3.3 The Semantic Features of English Causal Conjunctions in Modern Times
    3.4 The Prototype Features of English Causal Conjunctions in Contemporary Times
        3.4.1 The Pragmatic Features of English Causal Conjunctions inContemporary Times
        3.4.2 The Syntactic Features of English Causal Conjunctions inContemporary Times
        3.4.3 The Semantic Features of English Causal Conjunctions inContemporary Times
    3.5 Summary
Chapter Four Evolution of Prototype Features of Chinese CausalConjunctions
    4.1 The Prototype Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Ancient Times
        4.1.1 The Pragmatic Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Ancient Times
        4.1.2 The Syntactic Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Ancient Times
        4.1.3 The Semantic Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Ancient Times
    4.2 The Prototype Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Middle Ancient Times
        4.2.1 The Pragmatic Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Middle Ancient Times
        4.2.2 The Syntactic Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Middle Ancient Times
        4.2.3 The Semantic Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Middle Ancient Times
    4.3 The Prototype Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Modern Times
        4.3.1 The Pragmatic Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Modern Times
        4.3.2 The Syntactic Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Modern Times
        4.3.3 The Semantic Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Modern Times
    4.4 The Prototype Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Contemporary Times
        4.4.1 The Pragmatic Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Contemporary Times
        4.4.2 The Syntactic Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Contemporary Times
        4.4.3 The Semantic Features of Chinese Causal Conjunctions in Contemporary Times
    4.5 Summary
Chapter Five Contrastive Analyses of Evolution of PrototypeFeatures of English and Chinese Causal Conjunctions
    5.1 Similarities and Differences of Evolution of Pragmatic Features ofEnglish and Chinese Causal Conjunctions
        5.1.1 Similarities of Evolution of Pragmatic Features of Englishand Chinese Causal Conjunctions
        5.1.2 Differences of Evolution of Pragmatic Features of Englishand Chinese Causal Conjunctions
        5.1.3 Motivations for Similarities and Differences of Evolution of Pragmatic Features of English and Chinese Causal Conjunctions
    5.2 Similarities and Differences of Evolution of Syntactic Features ofof English and Chinese Causal Conjunctions
        5.2.1 Similarities of Evolution of Syntactic Features of Englishand Chinese Causal Conjunctions
        5.2.2 Differences of Evolution of Syntactic Features of Englishand Chinese Causal Conjunctions
        5.2.3 Motivations for Similarities and Differences of Evolution of Syntactic Features of English and Chinese Causal Conjunctions
    5.3 Similarities and Differences of Evolution of Semantic Features ofEnglish and Chinese Causal Conjunctions
        5.3.1 Similarities of Evolution of Semantic Features of Englishand Chinese Causal Conjunctions
        5.3.2 Differences of Evolution of Semantic Features of Englishand Chinese Causal Conjunctions
        5.3.3 Motivations for Similarities and Differences of Evolution of Semantic Features of English and Chinese Causal Conjunctions
Conclusion
Bibliography
Acknowledhements


【参考文献】:
期刊论文
[1]先秦因果关联模式探究[J]. 张亚茹.  现代语文. 2019(01)
[2]汉语因果构式“因为NP,所以VP”研究[J]. 马伟忠.  语言教学与研究. 2018(03)
[3]汉语兼表原因和结果的语法标记[J]. 曾冬梅,邓云华,石毓智.  语言研究. 2017(03)
[4]因果压制式的语义类型、生成机制及构式特征[J]. 李延波.  语言教学与研究. 2017(03)
[5]英汉因果复句逻辑语义的优先序列[J]. 邓云华,郭春芳.  外语教学. 2016(06)
[6]关于因果连词“因而”和“所以”的使用频率研究[J]. 曾希.  语文学刊. 2016(09)
[7]汉英原因关系词“因为”和“because”句法的历时演变[J]. 郭春芳,邓云华.  邵阳学院学报(社会科学版). 2016(02)
[8]从语体视角看“因为”、“由于”的差异性[J]. 赵宗飒,姚双云.  当代修辞学. 2016(01)
[9]原型理论背景下汉语因果复句考察[J]. 章欣.  国际汉语教学研究. 2015(02)
[10]因果复句关联标记模式与语序的蕴涵关系[J]. 郭中.  语言研究. 2015(01)

博士论文
[1]现代汉语复句关联标记模式的类别研究[D]. 郭中.华中师范大学 2013
[2]现代汉语因果复句优先序列研究[D]. 肖任飞.华中师范大学 2009

硕士论文
[1]汉英因果连词语法化的对比研究[D]. 邓凯方.湖南师范大学 2017
[2]主观性视角下的Because-因果复句多义性的研究[D]. 周静.湖南科技大学 2011
[3]由“结果”连接的复句研究[D]. 王佳毅.湖南师范大学 2005



本文编号:3100384

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiboshi/3100384.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户34e93***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com