介词in，on和at的认知多义研究

发布时间：2022-01-22 16:48

　　20世纪80年代,认知语言学兴起并获得广泛关注。与之前的结构主义语言学,功能语言学和转换生成语法相比,认知语言学最大的特点在于其对于语言意义本身的研究。认知语言学范畴之下的隐喻理论,转喻理论,意象图示,以及原型范畴等理论在语义研究领域都具有极强解释力。多义研究聚焦词语意义的研究。因此,多义研究与认知语言学的研究具有异曲同工之妙。这样的相似性为认知语言学研究与多义研究的结合提供了基础。本文选取三个空间介词in,on和at作为研究对象,首先通过研究分析获取了三个介词的原型空间意义,并画出三个介词各自在空间域上的意象图示;然后,以隐喻理论作为理论指导,分别分析它们在时间域,方式域,状态域,社会关系域以及其他域的用法,并在这个过程中总结三个介词各自用法的异同之处。本文从三个介词空间域的用法出发,通过隐喻理论将其研究范围扩展到时间域,方式域,状态域以及逻辑关系域。这一方法对于介词空间教学的启发意义在于:学习者可以在分析介词空间认知意义的基础上更好的理解其抽象意义。本文同时也证明了意象图示,隐喻理论对于词语多义现象具有很强的解释力度。而认知框架下的介词意义分析为认识世界和语言提供了一种新的方式。 

【文章来源】：西安理工大学陕西省

【文章页数】：70 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter1 Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Significance of the Study
    1.3 Corpus and Data Collection
    1.4 Structure of the Thesis
Chapter2 Literature Review
    2.1.Previous Studies on Polysemy
    2.2 Cognitive Study on Prepositions’Polysemy
        2.2.1 Cognitive Study on Prepositions Polysemy Abroad
        2.2.2 Cognitive Study Prepositions Polysemy at Home
    2.3 Previous Cognitive Study on in,on and at
Chapter3 Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Image Scheme
        3.1.1 Definition of Image Scheme
        3.1.2 Internal Structure of Image Scheme
        3.1.3 Categorization of Image Scheme
        3.1.4 Function of Image Scheme
        3.1.5 Summary
    3.2 Metaphor
        3.2.1 Traditional View on Metaphor
        3.2.2 Cognitive Feature of Metaphor
        3.2.3 Essence of Metaphor—Similarity
        3.2.4 Working Mechanism of Metaphor
        3.2.5 Classification of Metaphor
        3.2.6 Summary
    3.3.The Theory of Prototype
    3.4 Summary
Chapter4 Analyses of in,on and at from the Perspectives of Cognitive Linguistics
    4.1 Prototypical Meanings of in,on and at
    4.2 Image Scheme of in,on and at
        4.2.1 Image Scheme of in
        4.2.2 Image Scheme of on
        4.2.3 Image Scheme of at
        4.2.4 Summary
    4.3 Metaphorical Extensions in Other Domains of in,on,and at
        4.3.1 From Spatial Domain to Domain of Time
        4.3.2 From Spatial Domain to Domain of Manner
        4.3.3 From Spatial Domain to Domain of Situation
        4.3.4 From Spatial Domain to Domain of Logical Relation
        4.3.5 Summary
    4.4 Analyses of in,on and at in Other Domains
        4.4.1 Differences Between in and at in Other Domains
        4.4.2 Differences Between in and on in Other Domains
        4.4.3 Differences Between on and at in Other Domains
        4.4.4 Summary
Chapter5 Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings of the Study
    5.2 Limitations of the Study
    5.3 Suggestions for Future Studies
Bibliography
Acknowledgements
Achievements



本文编号：3602554