基于用法的模式视角下的中国日语学习者对移动动词「行く」和「来る」的使用研究

发布时间：2018-06-28 00:33

本文选题：移动动词 + usage-Based　；参考：《大连理工大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：移动动词“行く”“来る”作为表示动作的基本动词，无论在母语习得还是第二语言习得中都出现较早。作为本动词，除了表示“物理性移动”以外，还能表示“时间性移动”和“认知性移动”等抽象的意义。此外，还可以以“ていく”“てくる”的形式作为补助动词使用。除了拥有复杂的意义以及用法外，区分二者时还要考虑“视点”等因素。中日对于“视点”的认知上存在差异，，因此对第二语言习得造成了一定的干抗。本研究作为对移动动词“行く”“来る”的基础性研究，将以表示“物理性移动”的“行く”“来る”作为研究对象，以Usage-Based Model的观点进行考察，从从属于社会认知能i的意图理解能力、从属于一般认知能力的模式发现能力和输入的频率三个角度，对学习者的实际使用情况展开调查，探讨中国日语学习者在对表示“物理性移动”的“行く”“来る”的习得过程中产生影响的因素并从中推测学习者内在具备的认知能力以及外部的输入频率对习得使用产生影响的优先程度。从考察结果可以看出以下倾向： 1.以人力移动主体的“移动主体＝说活者”的模式产出最多。 2.一般认知能力优先于输入频率。 3.表示陈述事实的会话产出最多。 4.社会认知能力优先于输入频率。另外，本研究的考察结果再次验证了Usage-Based Model在第二语言习得方面应用的可能性。
[Abstract]:As the basic verb to express action, the mobile verb "line" and "Lai" appear early in both mother tongue acquisition and second language acquisition. As this verb, the abstract meaning of "temporal movement" and "cognitive movement" can also be expressed in addition to "physical movement". In addition, it can be used as a supplementary verb. In addition to having complex meaning and usage, we must consider the "viewpoint" and other factors in distinguishing the two. There is a difference in perception between China and Japan, which results in a certain degree of resistance to second language acquisition. As the basic research of the mobile verb "line" and "Lai", this study will take the "line" which represents "physical movement" as the object of study, and use the view of Usage-Based Model to investigate. This paper investigates learners' actual use from three angles: intention comprehension ability subordinate to social cognitive ability I, pattern discovery ability subordinate to general cognitive ability and frequency of input. This paper discusses the factors that affect Chinese Japanese learners' acquisition of "physical movement" in the process of acquisition, and extrapolates the intrinsic cognitive ability of the learners and the external input frequency to the learners' learning. Have to use the degree of priority that has an impact. From the investigation results can be seen as follows: 1. The model of "moving subject = living person" of the main body of human movement has the most output. 2. 2. General cognitive ability takes precedence over input frequency. 3. Statements of fact are the most productive sessions. 4. 4. Social cognitive ability takes precedence over input frequency. In addition, the results of this study confirm the feasibility of Usage-Based Model in second language acquisition.
【学位授予单位】：大连理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H36

【参考文献】