汉诗训读和翻译规律的探讨

发布时间：2018-06-28 03:36

本文选题：长恨歌 + 训读　；参考：《首都师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文以唐元和末年“宽永本”的释读为基础,在此基础上,把“宽永本”同现代“高木本”“目加田本”加以对比分析,发现了以下三个带有规律性的汉诗训读翻译特点。首先是日语翻译句式训读风格和汉诗句式训读风格的不同。所谓“日语翻译句式训读风格”,是指日语式训读翻译风格,而“汉诗句式训读风格”,是指接近原汉诗句式的训读风格。据笔者对比计量,“宽永本”和现代本形成此两种完全不同的训读风格的句式达23句之多。其次是汉诗训读中有24处对汉语词汇原封不动地加以借鉴的“音读词汇”。音读词汇是汉诗词汇日语化的一个有效途径,也反映着日语从汉语中汲取的大量词汇及增大日语中汉字词汇文化信息的历史形态。“宽永本”同现代“高木本”、“目加田田本”虽然时隔三百多年,但绝大多数音读词汇都具有跨历史年代的“音读同一性”。第三,“宽永本”中对“词组性词汇”和“以动词为中心的词语”多采用意译的训读方法,而现代训读本则多采用音读直译的方法。本文对白居易《长恨歌》不同年代训读版本的对比研究属于个案性研究,这一研究揭示的汉语诗歌训读翻译成日语的翻译实践的理论和方法意义是：江户时代的训读翻译者追求日语式的表达,故多采用意译训读的方法；而现代的训读翻译者则追求汉诗的原有节奏感,故多采用音读即直译音读的方法,这是江户时代和现代汉诗训读方法的不同之处。与此相对,江户时代和现代汉诗训读的相同之处,就是在对有典故性和中国文化性的词汇的训读上,基本上都采用的是音读直译的方法,而且这些词汇被收进了《广辞苑》等日本有代表性的辞书中,已成为日语词汇的一部分。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the interpretation of Tang Yuan and the last year "Guang Yong Ben", this paper compares the "Guang Yong Ben" with the modern "Gao Mu Ben" "Mu Jia Tian Ben", and finds the following three characteristics of the following regular translation of Chinese poetry.
The first is the difference between the Japanese translation sentence style and the sentence style of the Han poetry. The so-called "Japanese translation sentence style" refers to the style of Japanese style translation, while the "Chinese poetry sentence style" refers to the style of the original Chinese poetry. According to the author's comparison, the "broad Yong Ben" and the modern edition form the two kinds of completion. There are more than 23 sentences in all the different teaching styles.
The second is that there are 24 "sound reading words" in the Chinese poetry teaching, which is an effective way for the Japanese vocabulary of Chinese poetry. It also reflects a large number of vocabulary drawn from Chinese in Japanese and the historical form of increasing the cultural information of Chinese words and vocabulary in Japanese. "Although the word" Tian Tian Tian Ben "has been separated for more than 300 years, most of the vocabularies have the same pronunciations in the past.
Third, in the "broad Yong Ben", the "phrase vocabulary" and "verb centered words" are mostly used in the paraphrase method, while the modern one adopts the method of literal transliteration.
The contrastive study of Bai Juyi's "long hate song" in different years is a case study. The theoretical and methodological significance of this study is that the translation practice of Chinese poetry is translated into Japanese. The translator is pursuing the original sense of rhythm of the Chinese poetry, so it is the method of reading, that is the difference between the Edo time and the modern Chinese poetry. In contrast, the similarities between the Edo age and the modern Chinese poetry are the basic use of the words which have allusions and Chinese characters. The methods of literal translation, and these words have been incorporated into the Japanese representative dictionaries, such as Guang Yuan Yuan, and have become part of Japanese vocabulary.
【学位授予单位】：首都师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H36

【相似文献】