不同英语水平学习者议论文衔接机制研究

发布时间：2018-01-16 10:44

  本文关键词：不同英语水平学习者议论文衔接机制研究　出处：《湖南大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

  更多相关文章： 不同英语水平学习者 衔接机制 议论文写作 连贯

【摘要】：议论文写作是提高学生语言表达能力的一种重要手段,严密的逻辑性和良好的连贯性是它的重要特征,而议论文衔接的优劣是议论文逻辑严密性和语句连贯性的一个评判标准。议论文中的衔接机制使用情况能客观反映学生写作水平,因此对议论文中的衔接机制展开研究非常有必要。本研究选取湖南大学非英语专业的119名大二学生为对象,依据他们的大学英语四级成绩分成高低水平组,高水平组由总分排名前30的同学组成,低水平组则由总分排名后30的同学组成。本研究以每个研究对象写的同一标题的议论文为样本,依据英语四级作文评分标准对样本进行评分,随之基于韩礼德和哈桑的衔接机制分类对样本的衔接机制使用情况进行深入研究。研究主要从议论文中衔接机制的总体使用情况、高低水平两组学生的议论文衔接机制使用及不当使用情况的差异性和作文质量与衔接机制使用频率的关系四个方面具体展开。通过对数据的收集与分析,最终得出以下结论：1.从衔接机制在议论文中总体使用情况看,照应使用最频繁,连接和词汇衔接次之,而替代和省略使用极少；2.学生的英语水平与他们对衔接机制的运用能力呈正相关,高低水平两组学生对照应、连接和词汇衔接的运用差异明显；3.照应与词汇衔接使用不当率最高,低水平组学习者的衔接机制使用不当明显偏高,高水平组学习者更善于运用衔接机制；4.衔接机制使用频率与作文质量有显著相关,衔接对作文质量有显著贡献。连接与作文质量关系最为密切,其次为词汇衔接,而照应、替代和省略与作文质量关系并不明显。尽管本文选取的研究对象有限、样本数量为119,但在议论文衔接机制方面的研究成果对写作教学具有一定的指导意义。教师在课堂中应重视对对衔接机制的教学,激发学生正确使用各种衔接机制。学生需扩大词汇量,应用更多的词汇衔接,使文章表达更生动具体。
[Abstract]:On one of the important means is to improve students' writing ability of language expression, rigorous logic and good coherence is an important feature of it, and the argumentative cohesion is a criterion of argumentative logic and coherence. The statement for use on Cohesion in the paper can objectively reflect the students writing level, so the convergence mechanism of argumentative expansion in research is very necessary. This study selected 119 non English Majors in Hunan University sophomore as the object, divided into two level groups according to their college English grade four, the high level group consists of 30 students of the top score, low level group by the total score after the top 30 students. The same Title in this study, each subject to write essays as samples, according to four English composition standard for evaluation score for the sample, based on Hallidy and In-depth study on the convergence mechanism of Hassan classification convergence mechanism of sample usage. Overall study mainly from the argumentative convergence mechanism is used, the four aspects of the relationship between the level of the two groups of students argumentative differences in use of cohesive devices and the improper use of the situation and the quality of composition and connection mechanism using frequency specific. By collecting and analyzing the data, finally draws the following conclusions: 1. from the convergence mechanism in the argumentative overall situation, the most frequently used reference, conjunction and lexical cohesion of the substitution and ellipsis use less positively; 2. students' English level and their ability to use the mechanism of cohesion, low level the two groups of students on the use of reference, conjunction and lexical cohesion are significant differences between the 3. reference and lexical cohesion; improper use rate is the highest, convergence mechanism of low level group of learners use When the high level group was significantly higher, learners are more adept at using cohesive mechanisms; 4. use of cohesive devices is significantly related to frequency and quality of writing, cohesion contributes much to the quality of writing. The relationship is most closely connected with the quality of writing, followed by lexical cohesion, reference, substitution and ellipsis and writing quality although is not obvious. The object of this study is limited, the number of samples is 119, but the research achievements in the argumentative aspects of the convergence mechanism has certain guiding significance to the writing teaching. Teachers should pay attention to the convergence mechanism of the teaching in the classroom, stimulate students' correct use of a variety of convergence mechanism. Students should expand their vocabulary, lexical cohesion more, make the expression more vivid and specific.

【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H319.3
，

本文编号：1432775