基于概念隐喻的词汇教学对高中生英语词汇学习影响的实验研究
本文选题:隐喻 + 概念隐喻 ; 参考:《广州大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:隐喻在我们的生活中无处不在。Lakoff and Johnson(1980)认为,作为一种日常语言和思维的常见手段,隐喻也是理解自我和认识世界的手段,我们在潜意识中自动就使用它,而且,它往往是不可替代的。语言由形、音、义三大要素组成。其中,外语学习者的词汇能力直接影响其听、说、读、写等各项语言技能的发展。但在高中英语的实际教学中,现行的高中英语教材词汇密度大,复现率低,而且学校和教师面临着高考的压力与急于完成教学任务,学生词汇能力的培养往往会被忽视,学生记忆词汇的方法单一而生硬,效果并不明显。多年来,专家学者一直致力于英语词汇教学的研究,并取得了丰富的成果。二十世纪七十年代,认知语言学家发现了隐喻与语言的密切关系。认为隐喻在词汇习得中的应用能够减低难度,促进理解,发展灵活运用能力。因此词汇学习也离不开隐喻。文献检索显示,结合概念隐喻开展词汇教学的研究,大多限于大学英语教学。在此背景下,本文作者决定大胆尝试在高中的英语词汇教学中,利用隐喻理论指导词汇教学,并采取实验研究的方法,验证以下两个研究问题:(1)通过运用概念隐喻指导词汇教学,是否能提高学生的词汇学习能力?(2)如果可以,会对哪方面的词汇学习能力的影响更为显著?针对以上研究问题,本文作者对广州市花都区邝维煜纪念中学高一年级两个平行班共111名学生,进行为期十二周的实验研究。全部学生随机分配在两个班级里,为了实验需要,作者将两个班分为实验班和控制班。研究工具为:测试(前测与后测),调查问卷,面谈。在实验开始之前,对两个班分别做了一次问卷调查,主要了解学生学习英语词汇的现状及词汇学习方法。接着,通过全区摸底考试及Nation的词汇量测试,测量两个班的学生是否拥有同等的英语水平。前测后,由同一名老师,运用同一套教材,对两个班学生采取不同的词汇教学法。在控制组运用传统的词汇教学法,注重词汇的音、形、义,以及词汇在句子和篇章的运用。在实验组输入概念隐喻,运用隐喻概念指导词汇教学,并逐渐使之成为学生内化的词汇学习能力。在完成的十二周的实验研究之后,针对实验前进行的前测,对两个班的学生进行了四次后测,分别是全区的期末统考以及Nation的词汇量测试,目的是在同一方面更好地对比实验组和控制组试验后的差异。在此基础上,为了测试实验后两组学生的词汇学习能力(本文主要研究多义词的理解以及词汇的文化内涵在篇章中的理解)是否有显著性差异,作者增加了两个后测,分别是多义词的理解练习和词汇文化内涵在篇章中的阅读理解训练。同时,为了更好地了解概念隐喻对学生词汇学习有何影响,对实验班的学生进行面谈。后测结果显示,在全区的期末统考中,实验组平均分为101.6,控制组为96.13;在词汇量测试中,实验组与控制组的词汇量都有了提高,但实验组的提高更为显著;在多义词与词汇的文化内涵在篇章中的后测中,实验组的准确率明显比控制组高。各种后测数据表明,基于概念隐喻的词汇教学确实对学生的英语词汇学习有积极影响,并对实际教学有一定的启示,教师若能在多义词和理解词汇文化内涵的教学中,有意识地利用隐喻指导学生发现多义词各种义项的联系和在不同文化内涵中理解词汇,将取得事半功倍的作用。
[Abstract]:Metaphor is everywhere in our life.Lakoff and Johnson (1980). As a common means of daily language and thinking, metaphor is also a means to understand and understand the world. We use it automatically in the subconscious, and it is often irreplaceable. Language consists of three elements, form, sound, and meaning. Among them, foreign languages The learner's vocabulary ability directly affects the development of language skills such as listening, speaking, reading and writing. But in the actual teaching of high school English, the current high school English textbooks have a large vocabulary and low repetition rate, and the school and teachers are facing the pressure of college entrance examination and eager to complete the teaching task, and the cultivation of students' vocabulary ability will often be ignored. For years, experts and scholars have been devoted to the study of English vocabulary teaching and have achieved fruitful results for many years. In 1970s, cognitive linguists found the close relationship between metaphor and language. The application of metaphor in vocabulary acquisition can reduce the difficulty and promote the development of the vocabulary. In this context, the author decides to make bold attempts to guide vocabulary teaching in high school English vocabulary teaching by using metaphor theory and take experiments. The research method is to verify the following two research questions: (1) can the vocabulary learning ability be improved by using conceptual metaphor to improve the students' vocabulary learning ability? (2) if it can, what kind of vocabulary learning ability will be more significant? For the above research questions, the author of this paper is a year of high school in Huadu District, Guangzhou. A total of 111 students in two parallel classes were studied for twelve weeks. All the students were randomly assigned to two classes. For the purpose of the experiment, the author divided the two classes into the experimental class and the control class. The research tools were the test (pre test and post test), the questionnaire, and the interview. Before the experiment started, a questionnaire was made to two classes respectively. The survey, mainly to understand the status of students learning English vocabulary and vocabulary learning methods. Then, through the whole area test and Nation vocabulary test, to measure whether the students of the two classes have the same English level. After the previous test, the same teacher, the same set of teaching materials, the two classes of students take different vocabulary teaching methods. With the use of the traditional vocabulary teaching method, the system focuses on the use of vocabularies, forms, meanings and words in sentences and texts. In the experimental group, the conceptual metaphors are introduced into the experimental group, and the metaphorical concept is used to guide the vocabulary teaching and gradually become an internalized vocabulary learning ability of the students. After twelve weeks of experimental study completed, the pre experiment is conducted before the experiment. Test, two classes of students were tested four times, the final examination of the whole region and the Nation vocabulary test. The purpose was to better compare the differences between the experimental group and the control group on the same aspect. On this basis, to test the vocabulary learning ability of the two groups of students after the experiment (this article mainly studies the understanding of polysemous words. Whether there is a significant difference in the understanding of the cultural connotations in the text, the author adds two posttests, which are the comprehension exercises of polysemy and the reading comprehension training of the Lexical Cultural Connotations in the text. In addition, to better understand the influence of conceptual metaphor on the students' vocabulary learning, the students in the experimental class are interviewed. The test results showed that in the final examination of the whole area, the average of the experimental group was 101.6 and the control group was 96.13. In the vocabulary test, the vocabulary of the experimental group and the control group were all improved, but the improvement of the experimental group was more significant. In the post test of the cultural connotation of polysemy and vocabulary in the text, the accuracy rate of the experimental group was obviously higher than that of the control group. All kinds of posttest data show that the vocabulary teaching based on conceptual metaphor does have a positive impact on students' English vocabulary learning, and has some inspiration for practical teaching. If teachers can teach students in polysemy and understanding the cultural connotations of vocabulary, they consciously use metaphor to guide students to find the connection of various meanings of polysemous words and in different texts. Understanding words in the connotation will get twice the result with half the effort.
【学位授予单位】:广州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G633.41
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄华;商务语篇中的概念隐喻研究[J];广东商学院学报;2001年03期
2 屠金莉;苏立昌;;中医概念隐喻及其文化特征研究[J];语文学刊;2009年15期
3 王婷;;概念隐喻在诗歌语篇中的连贯作用[J];青年文学家;2013年27期
4 谷化琳;概念隐喻及其引申[J];大学英语;1989年06期
5 李勇忠,李春华;认知语境与概念隐喻[J];外语与外语教学;2001年06期
6 陆全;利用概念隐喻提高对词语的理解[J];咸宁师专学报;2001年05期
7 黄祖江;谈汉语表示“愤怒”的概念隐喻[J];西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年06期
8 陆全,贾启鸿;利用概念隐喻提高对词语的理解[J];武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版);2002年03期
9 文旭,叶狂;概念隐喻的系统性和连贯性[J];外语学刊;2003年03期
10 徐梦云;概念隐喻的跨文化动态投射模型初探:以“爱”为例[J];长江大学学报(社会科学版);2004年05期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 王俊;;简论空间概念隐喻[A];江西省语言学会第五届会员大会暨2002年学术年会论文集[C];2002年
2 陈维真;;跨文化概念隐喻和思维[A];第六届中国跨文化交际研究会年会论文摘要汇编[C];2005年
3 ;An Overview of Metaphor Research[A];语言与文化研究(第一辑)[C];2007年
4 袁艳;;网络隐喻的认知性研究[A];福建省外国语文学会2009年年会暨学术研讨会论文集[C];2009年
5 李妙;;隐喻力、创造力与儿童教学(英文)[A];第四届全国认知语言学研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2006年
6 陈雁翎;;从众参与者中的概念隐喻:MOREIS GOOD[A];福建省外国语文学会2013年年会暨海峡两岸翻译学术研讨会论文集[C];2013年
7 朱海燕;;Evaluating Temporal Metaphors[A];第四届全国认知语言学研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2006年
8 ;Modeling Vocabulary Loss——Approach leading to a comprehensive analysis of vocabulary attrition?[A];语言与文化研究(第一辑)[C];2007年
9 安虹;;A Comparative Study of Bird Metaphors in Chinese and English Poetry[A];第四届全国认知语言学研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2006年
10 冬加勇;;How to improve vocabulary teaching[A];江苏省教育学会2006年年会论文集(英语专辑)[C];2006年
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 谢菁;基于认知语言学的中医病因病机概念隐喻研究[D];北京中医药大学;2012年
2 郭爱萍;明喻和隐喻的心理语言学研究[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
3 徐章宏;隐喻话语理解的语用认知研究[D];广东外语外贸大学;2002年
4 林佑益;基于认知心理语言的五行概念隐喻研究[D];北京中医药大学;2014年
5 谷浩荣;基于概念隐喻的中医藏象学说研究[D];北京中医药大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 许安洁;基于概念隐喻的词汇教学对高中生英语词汇学习影响的实验研究[D];广州大学;2017年
2 罗希旋;概念隐喻视域下的词汇教学对艺术生英语词汇学习影响的实验研究[D];广州大学;2017年
3 马思林;关于小学《牛津英语》(上海版)教材词汇的词频角度分析[D];上海师范大学;2017年
4 胡乔石;思维导图在初三英语词汇复习中运用的实证研究[D];广州大学;2017年
5 吴怡潇;汉英食物类词汇对比研究[D];宁波大学;2017年
6 刘珊贞;高中文言文词汇教学现状及策略研究[D];广州大学;2017年
7 宋婉莉;智慧教室环境下英语词汇工具的教学应用实践研究[D];华中师范大学;2017年
8 彭巧兰;基于语境的高中英语词汇教学实验研究[D];广州大学;2017年
9 刘畅;中日词汇相互引用之比较研究[D];云南师范大学;2017年
10 龚滢莹;课文—单词教学路径对初中学生英语词汇记忆影响的实验研究[D];广州大学;2017年
,本文编号:2072403
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/2072403.html