英语学术语篇言据性对比研究

发布时间：2021-04-02 03:48

　　1947年,美国人类学家法兰兹鲍亚士在《夸扣特尔语语法》首次使用“言据性”一词,之后言据性研究在语言学领域逐步受到关注。言据性主要指说话人对知识的来源及态度的说明。言据性的表现形式主要有形态证素和词汇证素。形态证素主要指动词的前缀、后缀等,词汇证素主要指动词、副词、形容词等。近年来,言据性在学术语篇的使用特征逐渐成为研究的热点,学术语篇的言据性是说话人对信息来源及可靠性的认知编码,说话人可以根据交际意图使用相应的证素来表达自己对所述信息的态度。这不仅可以帮助读者了解作者的语篇目的,同时也为读者接受其观点提供一定的依据。通过文献综述发现,目前,关于言据性的研究多以跨语言对比研究、特定词类的言据功能探讨、不同语篇类型中的言据性表述研究等为主,以英语为主要语言的言据性研究成果相对较少（陈征,2014）,而对于英语专业硕博士论文与国内外学者在英语核心期刊发表的学术论文的言据性对比研究则更少。由于此研究现状,本文分别从爱思维尔官网和中国知网选取了三个语言学类期刊和三所大学,采用随机抽样的原则抽取了2017年到2019年英语专业硕博士论文和语言学类国内外学者的学术论文共40篇语篇作为本文的研究语料... 

【文章来源】：兰州交通大学甘肃省

【文章页数】：87 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Objectives of the Current Study
    1.3 Significance of the Current Study
    1.4 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 The Definition of Evidentiality
        2.1.1 Evidentiality in the Narrow Sense
        2.1.2 Evidentiality in the Broad Sense
        2.1.3 Evidentiality Adopted in the Present Study
    2.2 Evidentiality and Related Notions
        2.2.1 Evidentiality and Modality
        2.2.2 Evidentiality and Subjectivity
    2.3 Related Studies on Evidentiality
        2.3.1 The Typological Perspective
        2.3.2 The Cognitive Perspective
        2.3.3 The Pragmatic Perspective
        2.3.4 The Systemic-functional Perspective
    2.4 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Previous Classifications of Evidentiality
        3.1.1 Willett’s Model
        3.1.2 Aikhenvald’s Model
        3.1.3 Chafe’s Model
        3.1.4 Hu Zhuanglin’s Model
    3.2 Classification of Evidentiality in the Current Study
Chapter Four Methodology
    4.1 Research Questions
    4.2 Data Collection
        4.2.1 General Principles
        4.2.2 Selection of Targeted Universities and Journals
        4.2.3 Data Establishment
    4.3 Research Procedure
        4.3.1 Pilot Analysis
        4.3.2 Coding Procedure
        4.3.3 Analytical Procedure
Chapter Five Results and Discussion
    5.1 The Features of the Use of Evidentials
        5.1.1 The Frequency of Evidentials
        5.1.2 Distribution of Evidential Types
    5.2.The Contrastive Analysis of Evidentials
        5.2.1 The Contrastive Analysis of Evidentials in MA and Ph D Theses
        5.2.2 The Contrastive Analysis of Evidentials in English Ph D Theses and ResearchPapers by Domestic Scholars
        5.2.3 The Contrastive Analysis of Evidentials in Research Papers by DomesticScholars and Native Scholars
        5.2.4 The Contrastive Analysis of Evidentials in Student Theses and Research Papers
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings of the Research
    6.2 Implications of the Present Study
    6.3 Limitations and Suggestions
Acknowledgements
References
Appendix Ⅰ Evidentials Investigated in the Current Research
Appendix Ⅱ Titles of the Analyzed Academic Discourses
Academic Achievements



本文编号：3114525