当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 实验医学论文 >

人参皂苷对小鼠晚期乳腺癌模型的抑瘤作用

发布时间:2018-12-29 08:20
【摘要】:目的探究人参皂苷对小鼠晚期乳腺癌模型的抑瘤作用。方法小鼠适应性饲养1周后将4T1乳腺癌细胞悬液1 m L(1.0×1010L-1)接种于右胸部皮下建立晚期乳腺癌模型。30只BALB/c小鼠晚期乳腺癌模型随机分为模型组、环磷酰胺组、人参皂苷低剂量组、人参皂苷中剂量组和人参皂苷高剂量组,每组6只。环磷酰胺组小鼠给予环磷酰胺2 mg·kg-1,腹腔注射,隔日1次;人参皂苷低、中、高剂量组小鼠分别给予0.5、1.0、2.0 mg·kg-1的人参皂苷灌胃;模型组小鼠给予2 m L·kg-1的无菌生理盐水灌胃;灌胃均每日1次,连续4周。苏木精-伊红染色观察各组小鼠乳腺癌组织的病理改变,并比较各组小鼠的癌瘤质量、体积,抑瘤率,肺转移结节数及肿瘤转移抑制率。结果环磷酰胺组和人参皂苷低、中、高剂量组小鼠癌瘤质量和体积均显著小于模型组(P0.05),抑瘤率显著高于模型组(P0.05);人参皂苷中剂量组小鼠癌瘤质量、体积及抑瘤率与环磷酰胺组比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05);人参皂苷高剂量组小鼠癌瘤质量和体积均显著小于环磷酰胺组(P0.05),抑瘤率显著高于环磷酰胺组(P0.05);人参皂苷中、高剂量组小鼠癌瘤质量和体积均显著小于人参皂苷低剂量组(P0.05),抑瘤率显著高于人参皂苷低剂量组(P0.05);人参皂苷高剂量组小鼠癌瘤质量和体积均小于人参皂苷中剂量组,抑瘤率高于人参皂苷中剂量组,但差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。环磷酰胺组和人参皂苷低、中、高剂量组小鼠肺转移结节数显著少于模型组(P0.05),肺转移抑制率显著高于模型组(P0.05);人参皂苷中剂量组小鼠肺转移结节数及肺转移抑制率与环磷酰胺组比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05);人参皂苷高剂量组小鼠肺转移结节数显著少于环磷酰胺组(P0.05),肺转移抑制率显著高于环磷酰胺组(P0.05);人参皂苷中、高剂量组小鼠肺转移结节数显著少于人参皂苷低剂量组(P0.05),肺转移抑制率显著高于人参皂苷低剂量组(P0.05);人参皂苷中、高剂量组小鼠肺转移结节数及肺转移抑制率比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论人参皂苷能够显著抑制小鼠乳腺癌的发生、发展和转移。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the inhibitory effect of ginsenoside on advanced breast cancer in mice. Methods A model of advanced breast cancer was established by inoculating 4T1 breast cancer cell suspension 1 m L (1.0 脳 1010L-1 into the right chest subcutaneously in mice for one week. Thirty BALB/c mice with advanced breast cancer were randomly divided into model group and cyclophosphamide group. Ginsenoside low dose group, ginsenoside medium dose group and ginsenoside high dose group, 6 rats in each group. Mice in the cyclophosphamide group were intraperitoneally injected with cyclophosphamide for 2 mg kg-1, once every other day. The mice in the model group were given 2 mL kg-1 aseptic saline once a day for 4 weeks. The pathological changes of breast cancer in each group were observed by hematoxylin-eosin staining. The tumor mass, volume, tumor inhibition rate, the number of metastatic nodules of lung and the tumor metastasis inhibition rate were compared in each group. Results the tumor mass and volume of mice in the cyclophosphamide group and ginsenoside group were significantly lower than those in the model group (P0.05), and the tumor inhibition rate was significantly higher in the middle and high dose groups than in the model group (P0.05). There was no significant difference in tumor quality, volume and tumor inhibition rate between middle dose group and cyclophosphamide group (P0.05). The tumor mass and volume of high-dose ginsenoside group were significantly lower than that of cyclophosphamide group (P0.05), and the tumor inhibition rate was significantly higher than that of cyclophosphamide group (P0.05). In the ginsenoside group, the tumor mass and volume in the high-dose group were significantly lower than those in the low-dose group (P0.05), and the tumor inhibition rate was significantly higher than that in the low-dose group (P0.05). The tumor mass and volume of high dose group of ginsenoside were lower than that of middle dose group of ginsenoside, and the inhibition rate of tumor was higher than that of middle dose group of ginsenoside, but the difference was not statistically significant (P0.05). Cyclophosphamide group and ginsenoside group were low, the number of lung metastasis nodules in high dose group was significantly lower than that in model group (P0.05), the inhibition rate of lung metastasis was significantly higher than that of model group (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of pulmonary metastasis nodules and the inhibition rate of lung metastasis between the middle dose group and cyclophosphamide group (P0.05). The number of metastatic nodules in high dose group was significantly lower than that in cyclophosphamide group (P0.05), and the inhibition rate of lung metastasis was significantly higher than that of cyclophosphamide group (P0.05). In the ginsenoside group, the number of pulmonary metastasis nodules in the high-dose group was significantly less than that in the low-dose group (P0.05), and the inhibitory rate of lung metastasis was significantly higher than that in the low-dose group (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of pulmonary metastasis nodules and the inhibition rate of lung metastasis in the high dose group (P0.05). Conclusion ginsenoside can significantly inhibit the occurrence, development and metastasis of breast cancer in mice.
【作者单位】: 南昌市第三医院乳腺肿瘤科;
【分类号】:R285.5;R-332

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前8条

1 李红梅;聂丽娟;霍强;赵素容;马涛;吴成柱;刘浩;;Hsp90抑制剂i谌缢岫匀橄侔㎝DA-MB-231细胞增殖、侵袭、迁移的影响[J];南方医科大学学报;2015年03期

2 黄俊辉;张轶;黄玉婷;张曦蓓;肖佳;;MIF对耐ADM人乳腺癌细胞MCF-7/ADM体内外耐药逆转作用[J];中南大学学报(医学版);2010年06期

3 刘敏;章永红;颜晓静;张露蓉;;杉蟾藤成分复方诱导ER(+)人乳腺癌MCF-7细胞凋亡的实验研究[J];南京中医药大学学报;2014年03期

4 魏爱书;赵锐;;人参挥发油的研究进展[J];人参研究;2010年02期

5 吕红;邹乐兰;麻俊超;王珊;刘婷;柯小琴;付剑江;;三白草提取物抗乳腺癌转移作用及其机制研究[J];中国实验方剂学杂志;2015年07期

6 彭晓丹;诸梦露;高绿芬;刘婷婷;刘艳;欧阳媛;李若玢;刘礼飞;李译;刘晓宇;郑晓鹤;林绍强;;FK228和雷帕霉素协同促进人乳腺癌细胞凋亡和细胞周期阻滞[J];中国病理生理杂志;2015年04期

7 魏家彬;杨帆;王淑秀;;人参皂苷Rg1对1-甲基-4-苯基-1,2,3,6-四氢吡啶诱导的帕金森病小鼠黑质酪氨酸蛋白激酶A4表达的影响[J];新乡医学院学报;2015年05期

8 李馨刚;;葛根素对乳腺癌细胞MCF-7增殖及凋亡的影响[J];中国老年学杂志;2015年15期

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈斯泽;李玉齐;杨曙;莫贤毅;舒阳春;莫凯岚;丁颖;陈雪梅;;HSP90抑制剂对食管鳞癌细胞株TE-1凋亡的影响及作用机制[J];分子影像学杂志;2015年03期

2 李红梅;李静;靳伟;郭星;李楠;马涛;霍强;吴成柱;;新木脂素的酶法糖基化及抗肿瘤活性[J];南方医科大学学报;2015年11期

3 易文君;彭靖;张亚杰;付芬芬;邹琼燕;唐圆圆;;乳腺癌化学治疗敏感与耐药组织相关蛋白表达差异[J];中南大学学报(医学版);2013年02期

4 Lijun CAO;Tao XU;Hua ZHAO;Jianhua WEI;Dandan HAN;Rui ZHAO;;Technology of Supercritical CO_2 Extraction of Volatile Oil from RADIX ET RHIZOMA GINSENG[J];Medicinal Plant;2013年08期

5 宋毕清;时开网;杨士勇;;米非司酮对胰腺癌细胞耐药株Patu8988/FU的逆转作用[J];现代生物医学进展;2012年01期

6 曹立军;徐涛;赵花;魏建华;赵锐;韩丹丹;;超临界CO_2萃取人参挥发油工艺的研究[J];人参研究;2012年03期

7 赵花;徐涛;曹立军;魏建华;陈斌;赵锐;;正交实验优化6~㥮溶剂油提取人参挥发油工艺的研究[J];人参研究;2012年04期

8 刘婷婷;崔海月;王大为;;人参淀粉的基本性质[J];食品科学;2013年19期

9 苏向东;陆启丽;高琴琴;包海鹰;;独参汤化学成分的研究[J];人参研究;2013年04期

10 刘婷婷;刘鸿铖;樊红秀;王大为;;人参脂溶性成分提取工艺优化及其GCMS分析[J];食品工业科技;2014年09期

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 张敏;高速逆流色谱分离纯化人参、龙胆中的有效成分[D];长春师范学院;2011年

2 高宝荣;米非司酮通过上调Smac促进凋亡逆转卵巢癌耐药的实验研究[D];天津医科大学;2011年

3 孙艳;人参仿生化提取分离及初步药效学研究[D];长春中医药大学;2011年

4 崔芳芳;米非司酮抑制乳腺癌细胞增殖及促凋亡作用机理的初步研究[D];河南大学;2012年

5 刘宏;不同生境条件下人参中9种酶的活力变化研究[D];长春中医药大学;2012年

6 郑兵;人参煎剂与人参皂苷对小鼠免疫功能影响的比较研究[D];辽宁中医药大学;2012年

7 王悦;人参农药多残留检测方法及农药残留研究[D];吉林农业大学;2013年

8 张玉婷;人参提取物化学成分及质量研究[D];中国食品药品检定研究院;2013年

9 宋喜臣;保肝丸制备工艺及质量标准研究[D];吉林大学;2014年

10 牛春颖;蒸参水中挥发油的提取及性质研究[D];长春工业大学;2014年

【二级参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 宋长春,马兴元;人参露化学成分的分析[J];白求恩医科大学学报;1983年06期

2 马兴元,宋长春,徐景达,曹淑兰,李念平;人参挥发油化学成分的研究[J];白求恩医科大学学报;1985年04期

3 张伟红;张西臣;邢沈阳;李泽中;宫鹏涛;李建华;杨举;倪劲松;;DHRS7对人乳腺癌细胞MCF-7细胞周期的影响及其在乳腺癌组织中的表达[J];吉林大学学报(医学版);2012年03期

4 安明;赵国君;韦新成;;人参皂苷Rg_1保护心血管和中枢神经系统的药理活性研究进展[J];中国临床药理学杂志;2012年01期

5 方艳秋;齐亚灵;芦小单;马寅芙;谭岩;;环氧合酶2抑制剂NS-398对人肝癌细胞SMMC-7721增殖与凋亡的影响[J];吉林大学学报(医学版);2013年06期

6 吴卫平;李俊敏;张博爱;贾延R,

本文编号:2394575


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/shiyanyixue/2394575.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户06357***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com