初中语文教科书选文系统比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-10 22:14

本文选题：初中 + 四套语文教科书　；参考：《聊城大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：从教科书的构成系统以及构成要素来看,目前我国教科书均属于“文选模式”,且尤以选文(课文)为中心,选文对语文教科书的质量有着决定性作用。本世纪初,在新课程精神的感召下,国内初中语文教科书从人教版“一枝独秀”发展到“百花齐放”,不仅丰富了教科书的内容、使之更新鲜,也适应了不同地区历史背景和发展差异的需要。然而随之也引发了选文质量良莠不齐、选文数量泛滥等一系列问题。本论文主要以现行的人教版、苏教版、语文版和北师大版四套初中语文教科书为研究对象,着力对这四套初中语文教科书的选文系统进行比较、分析,梳理出这四套教科书在选文以及选文编排方式上存在的差异,让各套教科书取长补短,促进语文教科书的发展。本论文主要包括四部分内容:第一部分为导论,主要阐明了研究语文教科书的选文系统的原因。第二部分是对四套教科书选文系统的整体比较,对教科书单元组文方式、选文整体编排结构、选文数量比重方面作统计,发现人教版与苏教版都以人文主题组织单元,而语文版则沿用传统的文体组元模式,北师大版则突破性地将每一单元分为三个栏目来编排选文,选文内容学习安排更注重能力的提升。在选文总数上,北师大版选文的总数最多,比选文总数最少的苏教版多82篇。第三部分是对四套教科书选文系统分类比较,这部分内容主要对四套初中语文教科书中古代作品、现代作品、外国作品、女性作品选文的选编情况进行统计,比较、分析发现苏教版对现代作品选文更为侧重,而语文版比较偏重选文的“人文性”,选编的现代选文量最少,但对古代作品选文达到四套教科书之最。在女性作品与外国作品选文的编排上,四套教科书选编的量都不多,选编的范围比较狭隘。第四部分是对四套教科书选文系统的思考,此部分内容是在前两部分数据统计、内容比较分析的基础上,总结四套初中语文教科书的异同点,提出语文教科书选文容量适中,选文内容要达到工具性与人文性相统一、典范性与时代性兼具,选文标准要多元化的建议。
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the composing system and elements of the textbook, at present, the textbooks in our country all belong to the "literary selection mode", especially the selection of text (text) as the center, which plays a decisive role in the quality of Chinese textbooks. At the beginning of this century, inspired by the spirit of the new curriculum, the Chinese textbooks in junior high schools in China have developed from "one-sided" to "blooming a hundred flowers", which not only enriches the contents of the textbooks, but also makes them more fresh. Also adapted to the historical background of different regions and the development of different needs. However, it also leads to a series of problems, such as the mixed quality of selection, the flood of selection and so on. This thesis mainly takes four sets of junior high school Chinese textbooks as the research object, such as the current edition of personal education, the Soviet edition, the Chinese version and the edition of Beijing normal University, and focuses on the comparison and analysis of the selection system of the four sets of junior middle school Chinese textbooks. Combing out the differences of the four sets of textbooks in the selection of text and the way of selection, let each set of textbooks learn from each other and promote the development of Chinese textbooks. This thesis mainly includes four parts: the first part is the introduction, which mainly explains the reasons for studying the Chinese textbook selection system. The second part is the overall comparison of the four sets of textbook selection system. The author makes statistics on the way of text composition of textbook unit, the overall arrangement structure of text selection, and the proportion of selection quantity. It is found that both the people's Education Edition and the Soviet Education Edition organize the unit with a humanistic theme. The Chinese version follows the traditional stylistic composition model, and the Peking normal University edition breaks through the three columns of each unit to arrange the selection of articles, and the learning arrangement of the selected content pays more attention to the enhancement of the ability. In the total selection, Peking normal University selected the most articles, 82 more than the Soviet edition. The third part is the classification and comparison of the four sets of textbook selections. This part mainly compares the selection and compilation of ancient works, modern works, foreign works and women's works in four sets of junior high school Chinese textbooks. It is found that the Soviet edition pays more attention to the selection of modern works, while the Chinese version emphasizes the "humanism" of the selected text, and the quantity of modern selected articles is the least, but the selection of the ancient works reaches the highest level of the four sets of textbooks. In the arrangement of women's works and foreign works, the four sets of textbooks are not much selected, and the scope of selection is relatively narrow. The fourth part is to the four sets of textbooks selection system thinking, this part of the content is based on the first two parts of data statistics, content comparative analysis, summed up the similarities and differences of the four sets of junior middle school Chinese textbooks, and proposed that the text selection capacity of Chinese textbooks is moderate. To achieve the unity of instrumentality and humanism, the standard of selecting text should be diversified.
【学位授予单位】：聊城大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G633.3

【参考文献】