不同词条类型对高中生英语词汇附带习得影响的实证研究
[Abstract]:Vocabulary acquisition is an essential part of learning any language, and the study of vocabulary is also the focus of many linguists. The dictionary has no doubt about the role of language learning. With the advent of electronic and digital dictionaries, second language learners can choose a wide variety of dictionary models. However, the study of the dictionary from the perspective of the user of the dictionary is far enough. This paper is devoted to the study of the incidental acquisition of second language vocabulary under three terms, namely, the words and definitions, and the corresponding words in Chinese (case 1); the words, the definitions and the corresponding words and the English sentences (case 2); the words, the definitions and the corresponding words, and the Chinese translation (case 3). The purpose of this study is to explore how the three cases influence the acquisition and maintenance of the vocabulary, and whether the vocabulary level of the learners is relevant to the results of the vocabulary acquisition. In order to answer these questions, this study takes a quantitative approach. The study was attended by 132 students from a high school in Jiangsu who were asked to complete an empty task with a mini-dictionary, which contained 9 words. The vocabulary knowledge scale is used to measure the vocabulary acquisition in the post-and post-delay measurement. They are used to distinguish between high and low packets in English for a four-fourth test. The obtained data is analyzed by the software SPSS, and the result is discussed based on two theories, namely, the information processing theory and the understandable input. The main findings of this study are as follows: the different entry information can have different effects on the acquisition and maintenance of the second language-tied words. In the two posttests, the order of acquisition effect from excellent to inferior is, case 1, case 2 and case 3. In view of the current English level of this study object, it can be concluded that the term information effect in case 1 is the best for English learners in the middle or early stage. In terms of vocabulary retention, case 3 is the best. In case 2, or as a result of its cognitive overload, that amount of lost vocabulary is the maximum. In the immediate post-test, the vocabulary understanding and the vocabulary output are from excellent to inferior condition 1, case 2 and case 3. In the post-delay test, the word comprehension and the vocabulary output are from the best to the worse case 1, the case 3 and the case 2. The English level of the learner and the incidental vocabulary acquisition have a certain correlation. In that case of three term information, there is a moderate correlation between the English level and the incidental vocabulary acquisition, where the correlation between the case 1 and the incidental vocabulary acquisition is the highest. In a high-packet and low-packet comparison, that high packet in the case of three terms is significantly higher than the low packet and the difference is significant, mainly due to the influence of the learner's knowledge. The findings of this study may be helpful to the teaching of second language teachers and the second language learners, and to provide some enlightenment for the compilation of the dictionary.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:G633.41
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱晓琴;内部词汇与词汇习得[J];渝西学院学报(社会科学版);2003年02期
2 敖世翠;非英语专业本科生词汇习得策略研究[J];湖北大学成人教育学院学报;2005年03期
3 武雪霜;;谈词汇习得的认知规律与词汇教学[J];教育与职业;2006年23期
4 黄明毅;;复现与词汇习得[J];平顶山工学院学报;2006年03期
5 韦华;;词汇量水平与词汇习得策略的实证研究[J];河南工业大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
6 高华伟;;试论影响阅读中附带词汇习得效果的因素[J];南昌工程学院学报;2007年02期
7 李卫民;马晓艳;李杰;;词汇习得的常见误区及其突破路径[J];教学与管理;2007年30期
8 刘珂;邱天河;;试论阅读中附带词汇习得的效果及对教学的启示意义[J];中国民航飞行学院学报;2007年06期
9 董小晶;;非英语专业大学生词汇习得策略的实证研究[J];吉林工程技术师范学院学报;2008年11期
10 向正英;;综合性阅读与词汇习得[J];牡丹江教育学院学报;2008年04期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 白利莉;陈宝国;;词汇习得的年龄对词类信息加工的影响[A];第十二届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集[C];2009年
2 张彬;;隐喻理论在二语习得中的应用——关于隐喻意识促进英语词汇习得的实证研究[A];第四届全国认知语言学研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2006年
3 杨一博;栾岩;;认知词汇习得与英语教学[A];高教科研2006(中册:教学改革)[C];2006年
4 邵朝霞;;中国大学生英语词汇习得“石化”认知研究[A];中国英汉语比较研究会第七次全国学术研讨会论文集[C];2006年
5 李海燕;;读者变量对高职学生附带词汇习得的影响——基于信息加工理论的研究[A];2011高等职业教育电子信息类专业学术暨教学研讨会论文集[C];2011年
6 陈明辉;;隐喻与认知——“义项排列”的新视角[A];福建省外文学会2007年会暨华东地区第四届外语教学研讨会论文集[C];2007年
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 何静;第二语言伴随性词汇习得中任务含量的研究[D];复旦大学;2008年
2 孔燕平;中国英语专业学习者词汇习得能力探索[D];上海外国语大学;2005年
3 王哲希;阅读中教学干预手段对词汇习得的影响[D];上海交通大学;2010年
4 蒋荣;基于社会文化理论的互动与第二语言学习者词汇习得效应的研究[D];北京语言大学;2009年
5 韩晓蕙;可理解输入影响第二语言阅读理解和附带词汇习得之实证研究[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 潘硕颖;阅读教学中输入强化对英语词汇习得的影响[D];湖南师范大学;2015年
2 王凤;不同词条类型对高中生英语词汇附带习得影响的实证研究[D];苏州大学;2016年
3 崔颖颖;分级读物对高中生词汇习得的影响实证研究[D];湖南师范大学;2016年
4 刘倚天;英语绘书阅读对小学生英语词汇习得的影响实证研究[D];湖南师范大学;2016年
5 黄菊芬;英语词汇习得中的文化语境研究[D];上海外国语大学;2009年
6 张辉平;任务和学习者水平对附带词汇习得的影响研究[D];中南大学;2009年
7 杨素君;高职学生英语词汇习得策略研究[D];江西师范大学;2006年
8 祁晓韵;口头输入与附带词汇习得[D];苏州大学;2006年
9 朱红广;词汇深度,任务和猜词策略对词汇习得影响[D];大连理工大学;2007年
10 王奶妮;大学非英语专业学生附带性词汇习得实证研究[D];西北师范大学;2007年
,本文编号:2494412
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2494412.html