当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 领导决策论文 >

上级不当督导行为量表的编制

发布时间:2018-03-04 07:30

  本文选题:上级 切入点:不当督导行为 出处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2017年03期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:目的:编制我国文化背景下上级不当督导行为量表(ASBSS),并检验其效度和信度。方法:结合文献分析与32名企业员工的开放式问卷调查,构建了ASBSS的理论维度,并在此基础上编制初始问卷。选取200名企业员工,对于初始问卷进行条目分析。选取445名企业员工,将其分为样本1(n=223)和样本2(n=222),样本1用于探索性因子分析,样本2用于验证性因子分析及信度分析,两周后用样本2进行重测。结果:量表包含11个条目,分为忽视诋毁、蓄意阻挠及苛责下属3个因子,解释总变异的66.25%;量表具有良好的结构效度(RMSEA=0.06,GFI=0.94,NFI=0.92,CFI=0.96,IFI=0.96)。总量表及3个因子的内部一致性Cronbach α系数分别为0.87、0.79、0.78和0.76;重测信度分别为0.85、0.80、076和0.82。结论:本研究编制的上级不当督导行为量表信效度达到了测量学的要求,可以用来测量中国文化背景下上级的不当督导行为。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compile and test the validity and reliability of the superior improper supervision behavior scale under Chinese cultural background. Methods: the theoretical dimension of ASBSS was constructed based on literature analysis and an open questionnaire survey of 32 employees. On this basis, the initial questionnaire was compiled. 200 enterprise employees were selected, and the initial questionnaire was analyzed. 445 employees were selected and divided into two groups: sample 1 (nnnm223) and sample (2). Sample 1 was used for exploratory factor analysis. Sample 2 was used for confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis. Two weeks later, sample 2 was re-tested. Results: the scale included 11 items, which were divided into three factors: neglect and slander, deliberate obstruction and exacting subordinates. There were good structural validity of RMSEAA 0.06GFI0.92CFI0.92CFI0.960.The internal consistency Cronbach 伪 coefficient of total scale and three factors were 0.870.79 0.78 and 0.76 respectively. The reliability of retest was 0.850.80076 and 0.82respectively. Conclusion: this study made the improper supervision behavior of superior in this study. The results showed that the internal consistency of the scale and the three factors were 0.87 and 0.76, respectively. Conclusion: the results of this study are as follows: the internal consistency of the total scale and the three factors are 0.87, 0.79, 0.78 and 0.76; the reliability of the scale is 0.850.80076 and 0.82respectively. The reliability and validity of the scale met the requirements of measurement. It can be used to measure the improper supervision behavior of the superior in the Chinese cultural background.
【作者单位】: 河南大学心理与行为研究所;辅仁药业集团人力资源部;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71171073)
【分类号】:C933


本文编号:1564731

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/lindaojc/1564731.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4ec86***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com