高校不宜行政划成学术型或应用型

发布时间：2018-01-03 04:32

本文关键词：高校不宜行政划成学术型或应用型　出处：《职业技术教育》2014年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正日前,教育部透露出设立技能型与学术型两种模式高考,对现有高校进行大调整的消息,引发了教育界人士尤其是高校工作者的诸多议论。最有争议的意见,则集中在今后大学发展中,政府该扮演什么角色,行政权力该如何妥善且合理地运行。对于一所学校而言,正常情况下各个学科发展是参差不齐的,可能有些学科偏学术理论,有些学科偏应用技术,有效地发展策略应该是创造环境由其自主发展,不宜简单地一刀切为学术型或应用技术型。想想过去在一个行政指令下办起来的一批应用型高等院校,再想想"钱学森之问",今天的我们当引以为戒。对于当下高校毕业生就业难和技术技能人才供给不足的矛盾,要做更深入的分析,应该看到它不是学术型高校数量与应用技术
[Abstract]:Just a few days ago, the Ministry of Education revealed that the establishment of a skilled and academic model of the college entrance examination, the news of major adjustments to the existing colleges and universities, triggered a lot of discussion from the educational community, especially the university workers, the most controversial views. Then focus on the future development of universities, what role the government should play, how to properly and reasonably operate the executive power. For a school, the development of various disciplines is uneven under normal circumstances. Some disciplines may be partial to academic theory, some disciplines to the application of technology, the effective development strategy should be to create the environment by its own development. We should not simply cut it into academic or applied technology. Think about the number of application-oriented colleges and universities run in the past under an administrative directive, and then think about "Qian Xuesen's question." We should learn from it today. For the contradiction between the difficulty of obtaining employment of college graduates and the insufficient supply of technical and skilled personnel, we should make a deeper analysis and see that it is not the number of academic universities and the application of technology
【作者单位】：中国教育科学研究院;
【分类号】：G647
【正文快照】： 日前,教育部透露出设立技能型与学术型两种模式高考,对现有高校进行大调整的消息,引发了教育界人士尤其是高校工作者的诸多议论。最有争议的意见,则集中在今后大学发展中,政府该扮演什么角色,行政权力该如何妥善且合理地运行。对于一所学校而言,正常情况下各个学科发展是参差

【相似文献】