我国管制制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-07 20:02

本文选题：管制 + 刑罚　；参考：《安徽财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在当今世界刑罚轻缓化的大背景下,许多国家都在积极探索限制自由刑的理论研究和司法制度创新并在实践中广泛运用。管制作为具有中国特色的限制自由刑,产生于解放战争时期,并伴随着我国国情在不断发展变化,先后经历了异化时期和高速发展时期,同时管制作为我国唯一的限制自由刑以其自身独有的特点,在发展的各个阶段均与世界刑罚轻缓化的特点相契合,但理论界对管制的研究却一直处于缺乏的状态,虽然有些文献关注管制,但系统的著作少之又少。随着经济、社会、文化政治的发展,管制在司法实践中存在较多的问题,学界对管制的存废存在较大争议,持废止论观点的学者认为管制创制和发展时期赖以生存的历史条件已不复存在、管制的存在损害刑罚体系的科学性,管制在实践操作中难以达到惩罚和改造犯罪的目的,因此应当予以废除。持存留论观点的学者认为理应予以保留。同时学界的主流观点也是倾向予以保留,并在原有的基础上对管制加以修正。国家通过一系列的立法活动也表明对管制存废的态度与学界是一致的,1979年刑法、1997年刑法、2011年《刑法修正案八》与2015年《刑法修正案九》均在立法上对管制的内容做了修改和完善。可以看出,管制作为限制自由刑是无法从刑罚体系中剥离的,在纠结于管制的存废之争已无必要。但同时要认识到修正后管制在司法实践中依然存在惩罚力度弱、适用范围和对象狭窄、执行主体力度不足和执行主体权责失衡等缺陷,影响着管制在司法实践中效果的发挥,对于这些不足,有针对性的提出合理建议予以完善,增设强制劳动制度和引入易科制度增强管制的惩罚力度,扩大管制的适用范围和对象增强其在司法实践中的适用范围,充实执行机构的人力资源和扩宽公众参与渠道以增强执行机构的主体力量,赋予执行机关充分的调查权、强制权和追捕的权利来改善执行机构权责失衡的局面。
[Abstract]:Under the background of the mitigation of punishment in the world today, many countries are actively exploring the theoretical research and judicial system innovation of the restriction of free punishment, which are widely used in practice. As a restricted punishment with Chinese characteristics, regulation came into being during the War of Liberation. With the continuous development and change of our country's national conditions, it has experienced the period of alienation and the period of rapid development. At the same time, as the only restricted free punishment in our country, with its own unique characteristics, in each stage of the development of the world penalty is consistent with the characteristics of mitigation, but the theory of regulation has been in a state of lack. Although some literature focuses on regulation, there are very few systematic works. With the development of economy, society, culture and politics, there are many problems in the judicial practice of regulation. The scholars who hold the view of abrogation hold that the historical conditions on which control was created and developed to survive no longer exist, the existence of control damages the scientific nature of the penalty system, and it is difficult to achieve the purpose of punishing and reforming crimes in practice. Therefore, it should be abolished. The scholars who hold the existential view think that it should be preserved. At the same time, the mainstream point of view of the academic community is also tend to retain, and on the basis of the original regulation to be revised. Through a series of legislative activities, the state also shows that the attitude towards the control and abolition is consistent with the academic circle. The contents of the legislation on the control of the criminal law are: 1979 Criminal Law, 1997 Criminal Law, 2011 Criminal Law Amendment VIII and 2015 Criminal Law Amendment IX. It has been revised and improved. It can be seen that control as a restriction of free punishment can not be separated from the penalty system, and it is unnecessary to struggle for the existence or abolition of control. But at the same time, we should realize that there are still some defects in the judicial practice, such as weak punishment, narrow scope of application and object, insufficient force of executive subject and imbalance of power and responsibility of subject, which affect the effect of regulation in judicial practice. For these shortcomings, we should put forward some reasonable suggestions to perfect them, add the compulsory labor system and introduce the system of changing branches to strengthen the punishment of the control, expand the scope of application and the object of the control, and strengthen the scope of application in the judicial practice. Strengthen the human resources of the executive organization and widen the channels of public participation in order to strengthen the main force of the executive organization, and endow the executive organ with the full investigation power, the compulsory right and the right of pursuit to improve the situation of the imbalance of the executive agency's power and responsibility.
【学位授予单位】：安徽财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】